A new method to measure electron density and effective atomic number using dual-energy CT images

The purpose of this work is to present a new method to extract the electron density ([Formula: see text]) and the effective atomic number (Z eff) from dual-energy CT images, based on a Karhunen-Loeve expansion (KLE) of the atomic cross section per electron. This method was used to calibrate a Siemens Definition CT using the CIRS phantom. The predicted electron density and effective atomic number using 80 kVp and 140 kVp were compared with a calibration phantom and an independent set of samples. The mean absolute deviations between the theoretical and calculated values for all the samples were 1.7 %  ±  0.1 % for [Formula: see text] and 4.1 %  ±  0.3 % for Z eff. Finally, these results were compared with other stoichiometric method. The application of the KLE to represent the atomic cross section per electron is a promising method for calculating [Formula: see text] and Z eff using dual-energy CT images.

[1]  M. Saito.  Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  C. McCollough,et al.  Improved dual-energy material discrimination for dual-source CT by means of additional spectral filtration. , 2009, Medical physics.

[4]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  X-ray attenuation coefficients of elements and mixtures , 1981 .

[5]  U. Schneider,et al.  Evaluation des Elektronendichte-Phantoms CIRS Model 62 , 2001 .

[6]  J. Seco,et al.  Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Guowei Zhang,et al.  A practical reconstruction method for dual energy computed tomography , 2008 .

[8]  M. Saito,et al.  Technical Note: exploring the limit for the conversion of energy-subtracted CT number to electron density for high-atomic-number materials. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  S. Midgley.  A parameterization scheme for the x-ray linear attenuation coefficient and energy absorption coefficient. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo treatment planning: a simulation study using dual-energy CT images. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Yoshiyuki Noto,et al.  Initial implementation of the conversion from the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density in tissue inhomogeneity corrections: an anthropomorphic phantom study of radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2015, Medical physics.

[13]  C. McCollough,et al.  Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: three-material decomposition. , 2009, Medical physics.

[14]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Review of photon interaction cross section data in the medical and biological context. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  M. Saito,et al.  Conversion of the energy-subtracted CT number to electron density based on a single linear relationship: an experimental verification using a clinical dual-source CT scanner , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Robert de Levie,et al.  Advanced Excel for Scientific Data Analysis , 2001 .

[17]  Hans Bornefalk.  XCOM intrinsic dimensionality for low-Z elements at diagnostic energies. , 2012, Medical physics.

[18]  Frank Verhaegen,et al.  Simulation study on potential accuracy gains from dual energy CT tissue segmentation for low-energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  E. Pedroni,et al.  The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Alexandra E Bourque,et al.  A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Extracting atomic numbers and electron densities from a dual source dual energy CT scanner: experiments and a simulation model. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  W. Kalender,et al.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions , 2000 .

[23]  P M Evans,et al.  Assessing the effect of electron density in photon dose calculations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[24]  Technical Note: Relation between dual-energy subtraction of CT images for electron density calibration and virtual monochromatic imaging. , 2015, Medical physics.

[25]  B. Whiting,et al.  On two-parameter models of photon cross sections: application to dual-energy CT imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[26]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  Density and atomic number measurements with spectral x-ray attenuation method , 2003 .

[27]  M. Saito.  Optimized low-kV spectrum of dual-energy CT equipped with high-kV tin filtration for electron density measurements. , 2011, Medical physics.

[28]  L. Gerward,et al.  WinXCom – a program for calculating x-ray attenuation coefficients , 2004 .

[29]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Optimal Spectral Filtration for Dual-Energy and Dual-Source CT , 2009 .

[30]  T. Coplen.  Atomic Weights of the Elements , 2003 .

[31]  Vladimir Buljak.  Inverse Analyses with Model Reduction: Proper Orthogonal Decomposition in Structural Mechanics , 2011 .