Toward an Integrated Theory of Probation

Efforts to strengthen probation programs are often hampered by the lack of a normative theory for probation practice. This study sought to generate a theory of probation practice from the perspective of officers who currently supervise delinquent juveniles on probation. A grounded theory approach was employed with 31 officers who participated in semistructured interviews about their probation practices. Results of the study were synthesized into a comprehensive framework for probation called the participation process model of probation. The participation process model describes change mechanisms that are hypothesized by officers to link their use of specific tactics and strategies with two long-term objectives: risk/need reduction and accountability. Key change mechanisms include youth participation/cooperation, relationship strength, parental support, and motivational processes. The participation process model provides a framework to guide future research and program development.

[1]  Deterrence: Testing the Effects of Perceived Sanction Certainty on Probation Violations , 2000 .

[2]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Social Networks and Social Control of Probationers with Co-Occurring Mental and Substance Abuse Problems , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[3]  Tracey A. Vieira,et al.  Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs , 2009 .

[4]  D. A. Andrews,et al.  Classification for Effective Rehabilitation , 1990 .

[5]  H. Snyder,et al.  Juvenile Offenders and Victims: 1999 National Report. , 2006 .

[6]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  An Intensive Supervision Program That Worked: Service Delivery, Professional Orientation, and Organizational Supportiveness , 2005 .

[7]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of Systematic Reviews , 2007 .

[8]  James Bonta,et al.  Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. , 2010 .

[9]  K. Dodge,et al.  On the relation between social information processing and socially competent behavior in early school-aged children. , 1994, Child development.

[10]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[11]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses , 2007 .

[12]  James Bonta,et al.  Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision , 2008 .

[13]  J. Howell Preventing and Reducing Juvenile Delinquency: A Comprehensive Framework , 2003 .

[14]  D. Ward,et al.  Rational Choice, Deterrence, and Theoretical Integration , 2006 .

[15]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[16]  Greg Pogarsky Deterrence and Individual Differences Among Convicted Offenders , 2007 .

[17]  D. Polcin,et al.  Factors Associated with Probation Officers' Use of Criminal Justice Coercion to Mandate Alcohol Treatment , 2003, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[18]  D. Mackenzie,et al.  The Impact of Probation on the Criminal Activities of Offenders , 1999 .

[19]  M. Sandelowski Sample size in qualitative research. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[20]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[21]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Back to the Future: from Klockars' Model of Effective Supervision to Evidence-based Practice in Probation , 2022 .

[22]  Joan Petersilia,et al.  Intensive Probation and Parole , 1993, Crime and Justice.

[23]  James Bonta,et al.  Risk-needs assessment and treatment. , 1996 .

[24]  D. Mackenzie,et al.  The Impact of Formal and Informal Social Controls on the Criminal Activities of Probationers , 2002 .

[25]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[26]  Mahesh K. Nalla,et al.  Explaining juveniles' attitudes toward the police , 1998 .

[27]  G. Bazemore,et al.  Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice : building theory and policy from practice , 2011 .

[28]  T. Tyler Restorative Justice and Procedural Justice: Dealing with Rule Breaking , 2006 .

[29]  Mark H. Bergstrom,et al.  Economic Sanctions in Criminal Justice , 2006 .

[30]  D. Herrmann Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. , 1997 .

[31]  S. Walters,et al.  Motivational Interviewing as a Supervision Strategy in Probation: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial , 2010 .

[32]  William Wells,et al.  Type of contact and evaluations of police officers: The effects of procedural justice across three types of police-citizen contacts , 2007 .

[33]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: blending care with control. , 2007, Psychological assessment.

[34]  EVIDENCE-BASED ADULT CORRECTIONS PROGRAMS : WHAT WORKS AND WHAT DOES NOT , 2022 .

[35]  W. Bradshaw,et al.  An Empirical Review of Family Group Conferencing in Juvenile Offenses , 2005 .

[36]  F. P. Williams,et al.  Juvenile offenders and victims , 2007 .

[37]  S. Ghetti,et al.  Reactions to youth crime: perceptions of accountability and competency. , 2001, Behavioral sciences & the law.

[38]  M. L. Griffin,et al.  The Effect of Social Bonds on Successful Adjustment to Probation: An Event History Analysis , 2004 .

[39]  Tina Maschi,et al.  Investigating Probation Strategies with Juvenile Offenders: The Influence of Officers’ Attitudes and Youth Characteristics , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[40]  Jennifer L. Ferguson,et al.  Putting the “What Works” Research into Practice , 2002 .

[41]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[42]  Dennis A. Romig,et al.  The Balanced Approach to Juvenile Probation , 1988 .

[43]  Paul Gendreau,et al.  Effective correctional treatment , 1980 .

[44]  Margaret Russell,et al.  Examining the predictors of juvenile probation officers' rehabilitation orientation , 2008 .

[45]  Carl B. Klockars A theory of probation supervision. , 1972 .

[46]  Stuart S. Yeh Cost-benefit analysis of reducing crime through electronic monitoring of parolees and probationers , 2010 .

[47]  K. Mack,et al.  The effects of occupation and education on punitive orientations among juvenile justice personnel , 2002 .

[48]  Tina Maschi,et al.  Confronting Delinquency: Probations Officers’ Use of Coercion and Client-Centered Tactics to Foster Youth Compliance , 2011 .

[49]  Mario A. Paparozzi,et al.  Probation and Parole: Overworked, Misunderstood, and Under-Appreciated: But Why? , 2008 .

[50]  Deborah K. Padgett,et al.  Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research , 2008 .

[51]  Alan T. Harland Choosing correctional options that work. Defining the demand and evaluation the supply. (Weber) , 1999 .

[52]  Stacy C. Moak,et al.  Attitudes of Louisiana practitioners toward rehabilitation of juvenile offenders , 2000 .

[53]  Amber Sehgal,et al.  Implementing “Corrections of Place” Ideas , 2007 .

[54]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  The positive effects of cognitive–behavioral programs for offenders: A meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment , 2005 .

[55]  S. Thompson Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[56]  Travis C. Pratt,et al.  The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[57]  Tracy L. Spinrad,et al.  Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment. , 2010, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[58]  Megan C. Kurlychek,et al.  Focus on Accountability: Best Practices for Juvenile Court and Probation , 1999 .

[59]  Bryan Hartzler,et al.  Moving Criminal Justice Organizations Toward Adoption of Evidence-Based Practice via Advanced Workshop Training in Motivational Interviewing: A Research Note , 2011 .

[60]  Alan Shiell,et al.  Theorising Interventions as Events in Systems , 2009, American journal of community psychology.

[61]  R. Martinson,et al.  What works ?-- questions and answers about prison reform , 2006 .