Physician Variation in Time to Antimicrobial Treatment for Septic Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Objectives: Delayed initiation of appropriate antimicrobials is linked to higher sepsis mortality. We investigated interphysician variation in septic patients’ door-to-antimicrobial time. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Emergency department of an academic medical center. Subjects: Adult patients treated with antimicrobials in the emergency department between 2009 and 2015 for fluid-refractory severe sepsis or septic shock. Patients who were transferred, received antimicrobials prior to emergency department arrival, or were treated by an attending physician who cared for less than five study patients were excluded. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We employed multivariable linear regression to evaluate the association between treating attending physician and door-to-antimicrobial time after adjustment for illness severity (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score), patient age, prehospital or arrival hypotension, admission from a long-term care facility, mode of arrival, weekend or nighttime admission, source of infection, and trainee involvement in care. Among 421 eligible patients, 74% received antimicrobials within 3 hours of emergency department arrival. After covariate adjustment, attending physicians’ (n = 40) median door-to-antimicrobial times varied significantly, ranging from 71 to 359 minutes (p = 0.002). The percentage of each physician’s patients whose antimicrobials began within 3 hours of emergency department arrival ranged from 0% to 100%. Overall, 12% of variability in antimicrobial timing was explained by the attending physician compared with 4% attributable to illness severity as measured by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (p < 0.001). Some but not all physicians started antimicrobials later for patients who were normotensive on presentation (p = 0.017) or who had a source of infection other than pneumonia (p = 0.006). The adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality increased by 20% for each 1 hour increase in door-to-antimicrobial time (p = 0.046). Conclusions: Among patients with severe sepsis or septic shock receiving antimicrobials in the emergency department, door-to-antimicrobial times varied five-fold among treating physicians. Given the association between antimicrobial delay and mortality, interventions to reduce physician variation in antimicrobial initiation are likely indicated.

[1]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[2]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[3]  J. L. Gall,et al.  APACHE II--a severity of disease classification system. , 1986, Critical care medicine.

[4]  D. Talan,et al.  Relationship of clinical presentation to time to antibiotics for the emergency department management of suspected bacterial meningitis. , 1993, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  J. Concato,et al.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[6]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[7]  George M. Furnival,et al.  Regressions by leaps and bounds , 2000 .

[8]  G. Clermont,et al.  Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[9]  S. Dzik.  Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock , 2002 .

[10]  H. Quan,et al.  Coding Algorithms for Defining Comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 Administrative Data , 2005, Medical care.

[11]  K. Wood,et al.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[12]  R. Wunderink,et al.  Delayed administration of antibiotics and atypical presentation in community-acquired pneumonia. , 2006, Chest.

[13]  D. Angus,et al.  Reducing the cost of critical care: new challenges, new solutions. , 2006, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[14]  J. Hollander,et al.  Systematic delays in antibiotic administration in the emergency department for adult patients admitted with pneumonia. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  D. Cook,et al.  A survey of Canadian intensivists' resuscitation practices in early septic shock , 2007, Critical care.

[16]  Peter Bacchetti,et al.  Effect of emergency department crowding on time to antibiotics in patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  G. Barlow,et al.  Identifying barriers to the rapid administration of appropriate antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia. , 2008, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[18]  M. Levy,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008 , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  David T. Huang,et al.  Variability in management of early severe sepsis , 2010, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[20]  M. Mathru.  Initiation of Inappropriate Antimicrobial Therapy Results in a Fivefold Reduction of Survival in Human Septic Shock , 2010 .

[21]  Munish Goyal,et al.  Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department* , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[22]  S. Bellamy,et al.  Factors associated with nonadherence to early goal-directed therapy in the ED. , 2010, Chest.

[23]  S. Djurkovic,et al.  A survey of clinicians addressing the approach to the management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the United States. , 2010, Journal of critical care.

[24]  J. Wennberg,et al.  Time to tackle unwarranted variations in practice , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Antimicrobial therapy for life-threatening infections: speed is life. , 2011, Critical care clinics.

[26]  Zachary F. Meisel,et al.  Arriving by emergency medical services improves time to treatment endpoints for patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. , 2011, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[27]  J. Kline,et al.  Association between timing of antibiotic administration and mortality from septic shock in patients treated with a quantitative resuscitation protocol* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[28]  Donald M Yealy,et al.  Severe sepsis in pre-hospital emergency care: analysis of incidence, care, and outcome. , 2012, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[29]  Samuel M. Brown,et al.  Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[30]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012 , 2013, Intensive Care Medicine.

[31]  Matthew Taecker.  Hospitalizations, Costs, and Outcomes of Severe Sepsis in the United States 2003 to 2007 , 2012 .

[32]  Pascale Carayon,et al.  Impact of electronic order management on the timeliness of antibiotic administration in critical care patients , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[33]  Alan E Jones,et al.  The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[34]  Pat Croskerry,et al.  From mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  A. Delaney,et al.  Timing of appropriate antibiotics in patients with septic shock: A retrospective cohort study , 2013, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[36]  B. Carr,et al.  Benchmarking the Incidence and Mortality of Severe Sepsis in the United States* , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[37]  Michael Bailey,et al.  Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  C. Camargo,et al.  Boarding is associated with higher rates of medication delays and adverse events but fewer laboratory-related delays. , 2014, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[39]  Tracy E. Madsen,et al.  The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock. , 2014, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[40]  M. Levy,et al.  Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Reduces Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock From the First Hour: Results From a Guideline-Based Performance Improvement Program* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[41]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. , 2014, JAMA.

[42]  Arthur R. H. van Zanten,et al.  The golden hour of antibiotic administration in severe sepsis: avoid a false start striving for gold*. , 2014 .

[43]  Amber E Barnato,et al.  A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Adil Rafiq Rather,et al.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) , 2015 .

[45]  S. Keenan,et al.  Patient and Organizational Factors Associated With Delays in Antimicrobial Therapy for Septic Shock* , 2016, Critical care medicine.