Influence of Multi-microphone Signal Enhancement Algorithms on the Acoustics and Detectability of Angular and Radial Source Movements

Hearing-impaired listeners are known to have difficulties not only with understanding speech in noise but also with judging source distance and movement, and these deficits are related to perceived handicap. It is possible that the perception of spatially dynamic sounds can be improved with hearing aids (HAs), but so far this has not been investigated. In a previous study, older hearing-impaired listeners showed poorer detectability for virtual left-right (angular) and near-far (radial) source movements due to lateral interfering sounds and reverberation, respectively. In the current study, potential ways of improving these deficits with HAs were explored. Using stimuli very similar to before, detailed acoustic analyses were carried out to examine the influence of different HA algorithms for suppressing noise and reverberation on the acoustic cues previously shown to be associated with source movement detectability. For an algorithm that combined unilateral directional microphones with binaural coherence-based noise reduction and for a bilateral beamformer with binaural cue preservation, movement-induced changes in spectral coloration, signal-to-noise ratio, and direct-to-reverberant energy ratio were greater compared with no HA processing. To evaluate these two algorithms perceptually, aided measurements of angular and radial source movement detectability were performed with 20 older hearing-impaired listeners. The analyses showed that, in the presence of concurrent interfering sounds and reverberation, the bilateral beamformer could restore source movement detectability in both spatial dimensions, whereas the other algorithm only improved detectability in the near-far dimension. Together, these results provide a basis for improving the detectability of spatially dynamic sounds with HAs.

[1]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The effect of frequency-dependent microphone directionality on horizontal localization performance in hearing-aid users , 2009, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Jerome Daniel,et al.  Further Investigations of High-Order Ambisonics and Wavefield Synthesis for Holophonic Sound Imaging , 2003 .

[3]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Increase and Subjective Evaluation of Feedback Stability in Hearing Aids by a Binaural Coherence-Based Noise Reduction Scheme , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[4]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Horizontal localization with bilateral hearing aids: without is better than with. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  T. Herzke,et al.  Toolbox for acoustic scene creation and rendering (TASCAR): Render methods and research applications , 2015 .

[6]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Robustness Analysis of Binaural Hearing Aid Beamformer Algorithms by Means of Objective Perceptual Quality Measures , 2007, 2007 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics.

[7]  D W Grantham,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Michael A Akeroyd,et al.  Spatial hearing and hearing aids. , 2016, ENT & audiology news.

[9]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Design of broadband beamformers robust against gain and phase errors in the microphone array characteristics , 2003, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Development and Validation of a Method for Predicting the Perceived Naturalness of Sounds Subjected to Spectral Distortion , 2004 .

[12]  Giso Grimm,et al.  The master hearing Aid : A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation , 2006 .

[13]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Sensitivity to Angular and Radial Source Movements as a Function of Acoustic Complexity in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 2017, Trends in hearing.

[14]  Thomas Rohdenburg,et al.  Development and objective perceptual quality assessment of monaural and binaural noise reduction schemes for hearing aids , 2008 .

[15]  Simon Carlile,et al.  The Perception of Auditory Motion , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[16]  D D Dirks,et al.  A procedure for quantifying the effects of noise on speech recognition. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[17]  Michael A Akeroyd,et al.  The detection of differences in the cues to distance by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  W. Noble,et al.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Tobias Neher,et al.  Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario , 2017, Hearing Research.

[20]  Chandler Dw,et al.  Minimum audible movement angle in the horizontal plane as a function of stimulus frequency and bandwidth, source azimuth, and velocity. , 1992 .

[21]  W. Owen Brimijoin,et al.  The moving minimum audible angle is smaller during self motion than during source motion , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[22]  Virginia Best,et al.  An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[23]  Peter Vary,et al.  Dual-Channel Speech Enhancement by Superdirective Beamforming , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[24]  Klaus Uwe Simmer,et al.  Superdirective Microphone Arrays , 2001, Microphone Arrays.

[25]  Volker Hohmann,et al.  Auditory model based direction estimation of concurrent speakers from binaural signals , 2011, Speech Commun..

[26]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fitting on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ) , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[27]  Vesa Välimäki,et al.  Fifty Years of Artificial Reverberation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[28]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Evaluation of spatial audio reproduction schemes for application in hearing aid research , 2015, ArXiv.

[30]  R. Plomp A signal-to-noise ratio model for the speech-reception threshold of the hearing impaired. , 1986, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[31]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Spatial Acoustic Scenarios in Multichannel Loudspeaker Systems for Hearing Aid Evaluation. , 2016, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[32]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[33]  W. O. Brimijoin,et al.  The role of head movements and signal spectrum in an auditory front/back illusion , 2012, i-Perception.

[34]  R. S. Peters The Role of the Head , 2015 .

[35]  Tammo Houtgast,et al.  Auditory distance perception in rooms , 1999, Nature.

[36]  Erin M Picou,et al.  Potential Benefits and Limitations of Three Types of Directional Processing in Hearing Aids , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Virginia Best,et al.  Measuring auditory spatial perception in realistic environments , 2017 .

[38]  C Kaernbach,et al.  A single-interval adjustment-matrix (SIAM) procedure for unbiased adaptive testing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.