Systematic review of chewing simulators: Reality and reproducibility of in vitro studies

Background The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the types of human chewing simulator described in scientific literature. Material and Methods An electronic search was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase and Scopus. The search strategy included 10 search terms: “in vitro”; “dental materials”; “shear strength”; “fatigue fracture”; “bite force”; “prosthetic materials”; “chewing simulator”; “chewing machine”; “simulated mastication”; and “dental wear simulator.” Two researchers worked independently to assess the titles and abstracts of the articles. The quality of the in vitro trials selected was evaluated by means of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials scale. Results The electronic search identified 80 articles related to the topic of interest. After reading the full texts, ten works were selected. The articles focused mainly on the design of chewing simulators. Most of them were considered of moderate quality. Regarding the characteristics that an ideal chewing simulator should encompass, the devices described in articles varied greatly in terms of movement, periodontal ligament simulation, force sensors, and the materials tested. Conclusions No chewing simulator offers all the characteristics necessary to reproduce human masticatory movements and forces under the humidity and pH conditions of the oral cavity. A simulator that encompasses all these characteristics would make it possible to standardize trials involving simulated mastication. Key words:In vitro, dental materials, dental wear simulator.

[1]  K. Alemzadeh,et al.  Prototyping Artificial Jaws for the Bristol Dento-Munch Robo-Simulator; `A parallel robot to test dental components and materials' , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  G. Ravera,et al.  The use of a masticatory robot to analyze the shock absorption capacity of different restorative materials for prosthetic implants: a preliminary report. , 2009, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[3]  A Harrison,et al.  Improved single- and multi-contact life-time testing of dental restorative materials using key characteristics of the human masticatory system and a force/position-controlled robotic dental wear simulator. , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[4]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[5]  S. Rues,et al.  Effect of impact velocity and specimen stiffness on contact forces in a weight-controlled chewing simulator. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  Christophe Jeannin,et al.  Development of a Chewing Simulator for Testing Dental Materials: A Pilot Study , 2015 .

[7]  P. Singhatanadgid,et al.  Effect of bidirectional loading on contact and force characteristics under a newly developed masticatory simulator with a dual-direction loading system. , 2016, Dental materials journal.

[8]  M. Özcan,et al.  Effect of Cyclic Fatigue Tests on Aging and Their Translational Implications for Survival of All‐Ceramic Tooth‐Borne Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses , 2018, Journal of Prosthodontics.

[9]  H. Hirayama,et al.  Fracture resistance of metal ceramic restorations with two different margin designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  D. Deniz-Sungur,et al.  Vertical root fracture resistance of simulated immature permanent teeth filled with MTA using different vehicles , 2017, Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry.

[11]  M. Huysmans,et al.  A multifunctional device to simulate oral ageing: the "Rub&Roll". , 2014, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[12]  C. Faggion Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. , 2012, The journal of evidence-based dental practice.

[13]  F. Pera,et al.  Robotic chewing simulator for dental materials testing on a sensor-equipped implant setup. , 2008, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[14]  M. Kern,et al.  Inlay-retained cantilever fixed dental prostheses to substitute a single premolar: impact of zirconia framework design after dynamic loading. , 2014, European journal of oral sciences.

[15]  R. DeLong,et al.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  S. Krifka,et al.  Influence of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth- or implant-supported crowns on wear of antagonistic and adjacent teeth , 2020, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[17]  P. Abbott,et al.  Experimental model: dye penetration of extensive interim restorations used during endodontic treatment while under load in a multiple axis chewing simulator. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  M. Steiner,et al.  A new method to test the fracture probability of all-ceramic crowns with a dual-axis chewing simulator. , 2011, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.