Learning to Be Edison: Inventors, Organizations, and Breakthrough Inventions

This study examines whether inventors’ past stock of inventions affects the rate at which they produce technological breakthroughs, as well as the role of organizational contingencies in moderating this effect. The breakthrough rate depends on the rate at which an inventor generates inventions and the probability that each of these inventions is a breakthrough. We argue that inventors with larger patent records generate a higher rate of inventions, but the single inventions that they generate each have a lower probability of being a breakthrough. Longitudinal data of 5,144 European inventors and fixed-effects estimation confirm these predictions and reveal that the net effect of the inventors’ stock of past inventions on the breakthrough rate is positive—that is, more established inventors display a higher rate of breakthroughs than brand-new inventors. We also confirm the role of organizational contexts in shaping inventors’ productivity. In particular, firms’ control over research and development targets lessens the advantage of established inventors with regard to the rate of breakthrough generation.

[1]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[2]  Myriam Mariani,et al.  “Stacking” and “picking” inventions: The patenting behavior of European inventors , 2007 .

[3]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[5]  Pierre Azoulay,et al.  Incentives and Creativity: Evidence from the Academic Life Sciences , 2009 .

[6]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[7]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Academic Freedom, Private-Sector Focus, and the Process of Innovation , 2005 .

[9]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Bias in Fixed-Effects Cox Regression with Dummy Variables , 2002 .

[10]  Linda Argote,et al.  First, get your feet wet: The effects of learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity , 2010 .

[11]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Lone Inventors as Source of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Laura B. Cardinal Technological Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry: The Use of Organizational Control in Managing Research and Development , 2001 .

[13]  Linda Argote,et al.  Organizational Learning: From Experience to Knowledge , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[14]  D. Harhoff,et al.  The Value of European Patents , 2008 .

[15]  P. D. Stokes Learned variability levels: Implications for creativity. , 1999 .

[16]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Fixed-Effects Partial Likelihood for Repeated Events , 1996 .

[17]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. , 1981 .

[18]  Karin Hoisl,et al.  Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey , 2007 .

[19]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[20]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[21]  E. Cowen Stress reduction and problem-solving rigidity. , 1952, Journal of consulting psychology.

[22]  Gustavo Manso Motivating Innovation , 2010 .

[23]  R. Veliyath Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[24]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Thinking inside the Box: Why Consumers Enjoy Constrained Creative Experiences , 2007 .

[25]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Vivek Tandon,et al.  1 Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation , 2008 .

[27]  Mooweon Rhee,et al.  THE LIABILITY OF GOOD REPUTATION: A STUDY OF PRODUCT RECALLS IN THE U.S. AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY. , 2003 .

[28]  Luís M. B. Cabral Introduction to industrial organization , 2000 .

[29]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. , 1997 .

[30]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[31]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Perception in Chess1 , 1973 .

[32]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[33]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[35]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Managing the new product development process: Strategic imperatives , 1998 .

[36]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[37]  G. King,et al.  Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference , 1989 .

[38]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[39]  Brian D. M. Tom Techniques of Event History Modeling: New Approaches to Causal Analysis , 2003 .

[40]  C. Panico Employment relationships in knowledge-based firms: Who should have power? , 2009 .

[41]  D. Simonton Creativity as Blind Variation and Selective Retention : Is the Creative Process Darwinian ? , 2022 .

[42]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[43]  R. Nelson Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Efforts , 1961 .

[44]  L. Fleming Breakthroughs and the ¿Long Tail¿ of Innovation , 2007 .

[45]  W. Dennis,et al.  Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. , 1966, Journal of gerontology.

[46]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[47]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  DO FIRMS CHANGE CAPABILITIES BY HIRING NEW PEOPLE? A STUDY OF THE ADOPTION OF SCIENCE-BASED DRUG DISCOVERY , 2004 .

[48]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Innovation , 1997 .

[49]  R. Oaxaca,et al.  Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model , 2006 .