Effects of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program with and without telecoaching on health-related outcomes in COVID-19 survivors: a randomized controlled clinical study

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effects of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) program with and without telecoaching on health-related outcomes in COVID-19 survivors. Methods: A total of 42 COVID-19 patients who completed medical treatment were randomly divided into two groups: the study (telecoaching) group (n = 21) and the control (no telecoaching) group (n = 21). Both groups participated in an 8-week home-based PR program including education, breathing exercises, strength training, and regular walking. The study group received phone calls from a physiotherapist once a week. Both groups of patients were assessed before and after the program by means of the following: pulmonary function tests; the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale; the six-minute walk test; extremity muscle strength measurement; the Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (to assess disease-related quality of life); the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36, to assess overall quality of life); and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: In both groups, there were significant improvements in the following: FVC; the six-minute walk distance; right and left deltoid muscle strength; Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire activity domain, impact domain, and total scores; and SF-36 social functioning, role-physical, role-emotional, and bodily pain domain scores (p < 0.05). Decreases in daily-life dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and exertional fatigue were significant in the study group (p < 0.05), and the improvement in SF-36 social functioning domain scores was greater in the study group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A home-based PR program with telecoaching increases social functioning and decreases daily-life dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and exertional fatigue in COVID-19 survivors in comparison with a home-based PR program without telecoaching.

[1]  M. Charlson,et al.  Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties , 2022, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

[2]  D. Kairy,et al.  Telerehabilitation for Post-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Proof-of-Concept Study During a Pandemic , 2021, International journal of telerehabilitation.

[3]  S. Scalvini,et al.  Feasibility of tele-rehabilitation in survivors of COVID-19 pneumonia , 2021, Pulmonology.

[4]  S. Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program for COVID-19 survivors (TERECO) on exercise capacity, pulmonary function, lower limb muscle strength, and quality of life: a randomised controlled trial , 2021, medRxiv.

[5]  A. Weil,et al.  Integrative medicine considerations for convalescence from mild-to-moderate COVID-19 disease , 2020, EXPLORE.

[6]  L. Sagarra-Romero,et al.  COVID-19: Short and Long-Term Effects of Hospitalization on Muscular Weakness in the Elderly , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  M. Qorbani,et al.  Prevalence and severity of depression, anxiety, stress and perceived stress in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders.

[8]  M. Spruit,et al.  Persistent symptoms 3 months after a SARS-CoV-2 infection: the post-COVID-19 syndrome? , 2020, ERJ Open Research.

[9]  M. Vitacca.  Will the COVID tsunami be able to impose tele-rehabilitation as a system opportunity? , 2020, Pulmonology.

[10]  V. Cavalheri,et al.  Recovery after COVID-19: The potential role of pulmonary rehabilitation , 2020, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy.

[11]  Angelo Carfì,et al.  Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Acute COVID-19. , 2020, JAMA.

[12]  M. Sivan,et al.  A Proposal for Multidisciplinary Tele-Rehabilitation in the Assessment and Rehabilitation of COVID-19 Survivors , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  B. Chau,et al.  Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Pulmonary Rehabilitation for COVID-19 , 2020, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation.

[14]  A. Bennett,et al.  The Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation , 2020, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[15]  S. Powers,et al.  The COVID-19 pandemic and physical activity , 2020, Sports Medicine and Health Science.

[16]  Ting Yang,et al.  Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) , 2020, Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine.

[17]  Chen Wang,et al.  Recommendations for respiratory rehabilitation in adults with coronavirus disease 2019 , 2020, Chinese medical journal.

[18]  Kai Liu,et al.  Respiratory rehabilitation in elderly patients with COVID-19: A randomized controlled study , 2020, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice.

[19]  J. Alison,et al.  Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease , 2018, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

[20]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[21]  S. Cuthbert,et al.  On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review , 2007, Chiropractic & osteopathy.

[22]  J. Garrett,et al.  Long-term oxygen therapy improves health-related quality of life. , 2004, Respiratory medicine.

[23]  ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. , 2002, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[24]  M. Saul,et al.  A simple comorbidity scale predicts clinical outcomes and costs in dialysis patients. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[25]  C. Zwillich,et al.  Dyspnea in the patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Etiology and management. , 1990, Clinics in chest medicine.

[26]  G. Borg.  Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.