The semantic interference effect in the picture‐word paradigm: An event‐related fMRI study employing overt responses

We used event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate neural responses associated with the semantic interference (SI) effect in the picture‐word task. Independent stage models of word production assume that the locus of the SI effect is at the conceptual processing level (Levelt et al. [ 1999 ]: Behav Brain Sci 22:1–75), whereas interactive models postulate that it occurs at phonological retrieval (Starreveld and La Heij [ 1996 ]: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:896–918). In both types of model resolution of the SI effect occurs as a result of competitive, spreading activation without the involvement of inhibitory links. These assumptions were tested by randomly presenting participants with trials from semantically‐related and lexical control distractor conditions and acquiring image volumes coincident with the estimated peak hemodynamic response for each trial. Overt vocalization of picture names occurred in the absence of scanner noise, allowing reaction time (RT) data to be collected. Analysis of the RT data confirmed the SI effect. Regions showing differential hemodynamic responses during the SI effect included the left mid section of the middle temporal gyrus, left posterior superior temporal gyrus, left anterior cingulate cortex, and bilateral orbitomedial prefrontal cortex. Additional responses were observed in the frontal eye fields, left inferior parietal lobule, and right anterior temporal and occipital cortex. The results are interpreted as indirectly supporting interactive models that allow spreading activation between both conceptual processing and phonological retrieval levels of word production. In addition, the data confirm that selective attention/response suppression has a role in resolving the SI effect similar to the way in which Stroop interference is resolved. We conclude that neuroimaging studies can provide information about the neuroanatomical organization of the lexical system that may prove useful for constraining theoretical models of word production. Hum. Brain Mapping 14:218–227, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior Cingulate and the Monitoring of Response Conflict: Evidence from an fMRI Study of Overt Verb Generation , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  P. McGuire,et al.  Silent speechreading in the absence of scanner noise: an event‐related fMRI study , 2000, Neuroreport.

[3]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES CONFRONTING PET AND fMRI STUDIES OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  E Zarahn,et al.  Event-related functional MRI: implications for cognitive psychology. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  P A Starreveld,et al.  Word substitution errors in a speeded picture-word task. , 1999, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Interference and Facilitation Effects during Selective Attention: An H2 15O PET Study of Stroop Task Performance , 1995, NeuroImage.

[10]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  How does weaver pay attention? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  The neural correlates of language production , 2000 .

[12]  A. Anderson,et al.  An fMRI study of stroop word-color interference: evidence for cingulate subregions subserving multiple distributed attentional systems , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  C. Price,et al.  A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[15]  G. Dell,et al.  Models of Impaired Lexical Access in Speech Production , 2000 .

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[17]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Caramazza.  How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[19]  A. Roelofs,et al.  The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production , 1997, Cognition.

[20]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[21]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Cerebral regions associated with verbal response initiation, suppression and strategy use , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980 .

[23]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Robust automated brain extraction , 2000, NeuroImage.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  How Many Subjects Constitute a Study? , 1999, NeuroImage.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach , 1999, Psychological research.

[26]  S. Petersen,et al.  Comparison of Brain Activation during Word Retrieval Done Silently and Aloud Using fMRI , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[29]  R. Golinkoff,et al.  Automatic semantic processing in a picture-word interference task. , 1975 .

[30]  A Caramazza,et al.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  O Josephs,et al.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging: modelling, inference and optimization. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited—Again , 1995, NeuroImage.

[33]  R. Bowtell,et al.  The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[34]  Trevor A. Harley,et al.  Phonological activation of semantic competitors during lexical access in speech production , 1993 .

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Event‐related f MRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[36]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[38]  P. Starreveld,et al.  What about phonological facilitation, response-set membership, and phonological coactivation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[39]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  W. Glaser.  Picture naming , 1992, Cognition.

[41]  Kamil Ugurbil,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of the role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in speech production: implications for the explanation of conduction aphasia , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[42]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[43]  S. Lupker.  The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[44]  Linda Wheeldon.  Competitive processes during word-form encoding , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[45]  H. E. Brown,et al.  Utilizing hemodynamic delay and dispersion to detect fMRI signal change without auditory interference: The behavior interleaved gradients technique , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[46]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  An MRI-Based Probabilistic Atlas of Neuroanatomy , 1994 .

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[48]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The variability of human BOLD hemodynamic responses , 1998, NeuroImage.

[50]  W. Levelt.  Models of word production , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  L. Fasotti,et al.  Stroop interference and disorders of selective attention , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.