Benefits of Group Foraging Depend on Prey Type in a Small Marine Predator, the Little Penguin

Group foraging provides predators with advantages in over-powering prey larger than themselves or in aggregating small prey for efficient exploitation. For group-living predatory species, cooperative hunting strategies provide inclusive fitness benefits. However, for colonial-breeding predators, the benefit pay-offs of group foraging are less clear due to the potential for intra-specific competition. We used animal-borne cameras to determine the prey types, hunting strategies, and success of little penguins (Eudyptula minor), a small, colonial breeding air-breathing marine predator that has recently been shown to display extensive at-sea foraging associations with conspecifics. Regardless of prey type, little penguins had a higher probability of associating with conspecifics when hunting prey that were aggregated than when prey were solitary. In addition, success was greater when individuals hunted schooling rather than solitary prey. Surprisingly, however, success on schooling prey was similar or greater when individuals hunted on their own than when with conspecifics. These findings suggest individuals may be trading-off the energetic gains of solitary hunting for an increased probability of detecting prey within a spatially and temporally variable prey field by associating with conspecifics.

[1]  Aaron Christ,et al.  Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R , 2009 .

[2]  S. Dawson,et al.  Effects of attached data-logging devices on little penguins (Eudyptula minor) , 2013 .

[3]  A. Houston,et al.  General results concerning the trade-off between gaining energy and avoiding predation , 1993 .

[4]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[5]  P. Ponganis,et al.  Sub-ice foraging behavior of emperor penguins. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[6]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[7]  Foraging behaviour of little penguins Eudyptula minor in an artificially modified environment , 2008 .

[8]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  Comprar Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R | Zuur, Alain F. | 9780387874579 | Springer , 2009 .

[9]  Horst Bornemann,et al.  All at sea with animal tracks; methodological and analytical solutions for the resolution of movement , 2007 .

[10]  Akinori Takahashi,et al.  Krill-feeding behaviour of gentoo penguins as shown by animal-borne camera loggers , 2008, Polar Biology.

[11]  N. Harrison Predation on jellyfish and their associates by seabirds , 1984 .

[12]  J. Cullen,et al.  Food of Little Penguins Eudyptula minor in Victoria: Comparison of Three Localities Between 1985 and 1988 , 1991 .

[13]  Y. Tremblay,et al.  Local enhancement in a seabird: reaction distances and foraging consequence of predator aggregations , 2014 .

[14]  G. Hays,et al.  The energy density of jellyfish: Estimates from bomb-calorimetry and proximate-composition , 2007 .

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[16]  D. Bates,et al.  Linear Mixed-Effects Models using 'Eigen' and S4 , 2015 .

[17]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[18]  R. Phillips,et al.  Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review , 2009 .

[19]  A. Chiaradia,et al.  Synchronized group association in little penguins, Eudyptula minor , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  D. Costa,et al.  Foraging behaviour and habitat selection of the little penguin Eudyptula minor during early chick rearing in Bass Strait, Australia , 2008 .

[21]  J. Arnould,et al.  At-Sea Associations in Foraging Little Penguins , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  G. Belovsky,et al.  Foraging in complex environments: When prey availability varies over time and space , 1989 .

[23]  R. Kuiter,et al.  The fishes of Australia's south coast , 1994 .

[24]  C. Ware,et al.  Underwater components of humpback whale bubble-net feeding behaviour , 2011 .

[25]  David M. Scantlebury,et al.  Flexible energetics of cheetah hunting strategies provide resistance against kleptoparasitism , 2014, Science.

[26]  H. Pöysä Group foraging in patchy environments: the importance of coarse-level local enhancement , 1992 .

[27]  Ann L. Rypstra,et al.  Prey size, prey perishability and group foraging in a social spider , 1991, Oecologia.

[28]  J. Arnould,et al.  Determining the sex of Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) in northern Bass Strait using morphometric measurements , 2004 .

[29]  P. Fauchald Spatial interaction between seabirds and prey: review and synthesis , 2009 .

[30]  C. Packer,et al.  Why Lions Form Groups: Food is Not Enough , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[31]  N. Klomp,et al.  Patterns of Arrival and Departure by Breeding Little Penguins at Penguin Island, Western Australia , 1991 .

[32]  Dp O'Brien Surface schooling behaviour of the coastal krill Nyctiphanes australis (Crustacea: Euphausiacea) off Tasmania, Australia , 1988 .

[33]  Akinori Takahashi,et al.  Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  B. Green Water and Sodium Turnover and Estimated Food Consumption Rates in Free-Living Fairy Prions (Pachyptila turtur) and Common Diving Petrels (Pelecanoides urinatrix) , 1989, Physiological Zoology.

[35]  G. Beauchamp Social Predation: How Group Living Benefits Predators and Prey , 2013 .

[36]  A. Bunce Prey consumption of Australasian gannets (Morus serrator) breeding in Port Phillip Bay, southeast Australia, and potential overlap with commercial fisheries , 2001 .

[37]  J. Parrish,et al.  Trade-offs in prey quality and quantity revealed through the behavioral compensation of breeding seabirds , 2012 .