Capacity Analysis for Flat and Clustered Wireless Sensor Networks

Wireless sensor networks are often divided into clusters to gain high-performance and prolong network lifetime. In this paper we analyze the network capacity of two different architectures, named flat sensor network and clustered sensor network. For each network, we first define the network model and then analyze the network capacity and the factors that affect the capacity. Numerical results suggest that clustering can significantly improve the network capacity. We also found that the capacity of a clustered network is saturated after the number of clusters is above a certain value. For clustered network architecture, we further study the capacity difference with or without the distributed coordination function. It is found that there is a critical value of the number of cluster heads beyond which the network capacity of two clustered models approaches the same. Results from this research will provide guidance in deploying high-performance wireless sensor networks.

[1]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  On the capacity of wireless networks: the relay case , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[2]  Murata Masayuki,et al.  Large-scale wireless sensor network architecture with multi cluster configuration , 2006 .

[3]  Damla Turgut,et al.  A Cluster-Based Energy Balancing Scheme in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks , 2005, ICN.

[4]  Atsuyuki Okabe,et al.  Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Applications of Voronoi Diagrams , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics.

[5]  Mingyan Liu,et al.  Data-gathering wireless sensor networks: organization and capacity , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[7]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[8]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[9]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Homogeneous vs heterogeneous clustered sensor networks: a comparative study , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[10]  Ian Oppermann,et al.  Low complexity UWB circuit transceiver architecture for low cost sensor tag systems , 2004, 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754).