Designers Discussing Design: An Investigation into the Design of an Innovative Science Textbook Designed to Take Advantage of Multi-Touch Tablet Technology and the Cloud

This study utilizes a modified Delphi design to assess instructional and curricular designers’ perceptions of E. O. Wilson’s high school biology textbook available for the iPad or other multi-touch tablets (MTT) and iBooks authoring potential. The first; and perhaps most lasting, impression of the group was this is a visually stunning, scientifically relevant textbook that should be a game changer in how the next generation of science textbooks are developed and the textbook that was measured in pounds and cubic inches of space in your child’s backpack is dead! Also the text has reasonable accommodations and some pedagogical tools. Concerns center on the struggling readers ability to process such a visually distracting presentation and typical concerns with integrating new technologies in any learning environment. What is the future of the traditional textbook? The states of California and Texas along with others (Hill, 2010) and the countries such as Turkey (Haber7, 2011; FATIH, nd) have recently launched initiatives to implement digital textbooks as primary or supplemental source material for K-12 instruction. Advances in publishing (Stern, Aprea, & Ebner, 2003; Trumbo, 1999), have resulted in textbooks that look more like the Internet (Leu, 2000), software (Anderson & Slough, 20112), or applications for smart phones and/or other hand-help digital devices such as multitouch tablets (MTT). As textbooks are transitioning to include more graphical information, MTT, and cloud computing open a new development window for the development of textbooks that champion the inclusion of more interactive graphical elements (e.g., hyperlinks, 3-D models, image maps, animations, videos, etc.) to fundamentally change the text accessibility (McTigue & Slough, 2010) for all science learners (Rupley & Slough, 2010). MTT are of particular interest because they have been reported to provide enriched interactions; new instructional approaches and models; interactive assessment and feedback (Roschell et al., 2007); increased engagement and improved classroom management through the maintenance of eye contact during instruction; recording of voice and video; easy sharing of data; use of multiple applications (Mock, 2004); cost savings verses traditional textbooks; ease of sharing/implementing supplemental material (Hulls, 2005); 3-D application for improved spatial learning; dynamic content; and speech to text and text to speech features for students with hearing impairments (Mitchell, 2007). In short, MTTs provide most of the advantages of a traditional computer with less of the limitations. One evolving innovative science textbook that takes advantage of the MTT and cloud computing is E. O. Wilson’s Life on Earth: An Introduction (2012). An introduction to the resource and the first several chapters are available for downloading on an iPad with iBooks and on a traditional computer with iTunes (this paper uses a version downloaded on March 2, 2012). The book is a product of the E. O Wilson Biodiversity Foundation and is being developed over the next two years to take advantage of the purported advantages of the MTT, cloud computing, digital publishing in general and the iBooks author tool being offered for free by Apple. This paper investigates the individual and collective perceptions of a group of instructional and curricular designers that have individual interests and expertise related to the design of science curriculum, interactive graphical elements, scaffolding, and reading strategies with struggling readers and includes discussion of the text itself and to a lesser extent iBook author and MTTs in general.

[1]  Scott Slough,et al.  Introduction to the Integration of Verbal and Visual Information in Science Texts , 2010 .

[2]  Scott Slough,et al.  Converging lens simulation design and image predictions , 2009 .

[3]  Scott Slough,et al.  Mathematics Classrooms: Is the Implementation Process the Same for Both Disciplines? , 2002 .

[4]  D. Leu,et al.  Literacy and Technology: Deictic Consequences for Literacy Education in an Information Age , 2000 .

[5]  R. Mitchell PC-TABLETS : The Next Dimension , 2007, First International Workshop on Pen-Based Learning Technologies (PLT 2007).

[6]  Scott Slough,et al.  Implementing Technology in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms: A Perspective on Change , 2000 .

[7]  J. Bruner The act of discovery. , 1961 .

[8]  Scott Slough,et al.  Descriptive Analysis of a Sixth-Grade Turkish Science Text With Recommendations for Development of Future E-Resources for Multi-Touch Tablets , 2012 .

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[10]  Scott Slough,et al.  Technology as an Innovation in Science and Mathematics Teaching , 2007 .

[11]  Maria Lúcia Castanheira,et al.  Talked Images: Examining the Contextualised Nature of Image Use , 2007 .

[12]  Hermann G. Ebner,et al.  Improving cross-content transfer in text processing by means of active graphical representation , 2003 .

[13]  S. Slough,et al.  Building Prior Knowledge and Vocabulary in Science in the Intermediate Grades: Creating Hooks for Learning , 2010 .

[14]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[15]  Scott Slough,et al.  Using the Concerns-Based Adoption Model to Assess Changes in Technology Implementation , 2004 .

[16]  J. Crisp,et al.  The Delphi method? , 1997, Nursing research.

[17]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[18]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Ink, Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement: Learning with Tablets , 2007, Computer.

[19]  Scott Slough,et al.  Digital Delight or Digital Doldrum: A Study of Graphical Representation in Digital Science Textbooks , 2012 .

[20]  Erin M. McTigue,et al.  Science Textbooks' Use of Graphical Representation: A Descriptive Analysis of Four Sixth Grade Science Texts , 2010 .

[21]  Scott Slough Some Concerns About the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) and Technology , 1999 .

[22]  Jean Trumbo,et al.  Visual Literacy and Science Communication , 1999 .

[23]  A. Paivio Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. , 1991 .

[24]  Rebecca Hill Turning the Page: Forget about Those Bulky Backbreakers, Digital Textbooks Are the Future. , 2010 .

[25]  Scott Slough,et al.  Re‐creating a Recipe for Science Instructional Programs: Adding Learning Progressions, Scaffolding, and a Dash of Reading Variety , 2010 .

[26]  Kenrick Mock Teaching with Tablet PC's , 2004 .

[27]  Scott Slough,et al.  Student-Accessible Science Texts: Elements of Design , 2010 .

[28]  Michael L. Connell,et al.  Defining Technogogy and its Natural Corollary, Technogogical Content Knowledge (TCK) , 2006 .

[29]  RoschelleJeremy,et al.  Ink, Improvisation, and Interactive Engagement , 2007 .

[30]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[31]  Robert M. Capraro,et al.  STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach , 2013 .