Estimating local biodiversity change: a critique of papers claiming no net loss of local diversity.

Global species extinction rates are orders of magnitude above the background rate documented in the fossil record. However, recent data syntheses have found mixed evidence for patterns of net species loss at local spatial scales. For example, two recent data meta-analyses have found that species richness is decreasing in some locations and is increasing in others. When these trends are combined, these papers argued there has been no net change in species richness, and suggested this pattern is globally representative of biodiversity change at local scales. Here we reanalyze results of these data syntheses and outline why this conclusion is unfounded. First, we show the datasets collated for these syntheses are spatially biased and not representative of the spatial distribution of species richness or the distribution of many primary drivers of biodiversity change. This casts doubt that their results are representative of global patterns. Second, we argue that detecting the trend in local species richness is very difficult with short time series and can lead to biased estimates of change. Reanalyses of the data detected a signal of study duration on biodiversity change, indicating net biodiversity loss is most apparent in studies of longer duration. Third, estimates of species richness change can be biased if species gains during post-disturbance recovery are included without also including species losses that occurred during the disturbance. Net species gains or losses should be assessed with respect to common baselines or reference communities. Ultimately, we need a globally coordinated effort to monitor biodiversity so that we can estimate and attribute human impacts as causes of biodiversity change. A combination of technologies will be needed to produce regularly updated global datasets of local biodiversity change to guide future policy. At this time the conclusion that there is no net change in local species richness is not the consensus state of knowledge.

[1]  Jaime L Peters,et al.  Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs. , 2008, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[2]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[3]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Invasions and Extinctions Reshape Coastal Marine Food Webs , 2007, PloS one.

[4]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Forest biophysical and biochemical properties from hyperspectral and LiDAR remote sensing , 2015 .

[5]  H. Mooney,et al.  Toward a Global Biodiversity Observing System , 2008, Science.

[6]  Walter Jetz,et al.  Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa , 2010, Nature.

[7]  Amaury Lambert,et al.  Mass extinction in poorly known taxa , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  D. Richardson,et al.  Historical legacies accumulate to shape future biodiversity in an era of rapid global change , 2015 .

[9]  Ben Collen,et al.  Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Land Resources Monitoring, Modeling, and Mapping with Remote Sensing , 2015 .

[12]  S. Goldhor.  Ecology , 1964, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[13]  J. Bruno,et al.  Landscape-scale patterns of biological invasions in shoreline plant communities , 2004 .

[14]  M. J. Hensel,et al.  Recent Trends in Local-Scale Marine Biodiversity Reflect Community Structure and Human Impacts , 2015, Current Biology.

[15]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Rapid Recovery of Damaged Ecosystems , 2009, PloS one.

[16]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[17]  Kees Klein Goldewijk,et al.  The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human‐induced global land‐use change over the past 12,000 years , 2011 .

[18]  S. Polasky,et al.  The biodiversity-dependent ecosystem service debt. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[19]  Lander Baeten,et al.  Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Meta-analyses and mega-mistakes: calling time on meta-analysis of the species richness-productivity relationship. , 2010, Ecology.

[21]  Ingolf Kühn,et al.  Europe’s other debt crisis caused by the long legacy of future extinctions , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  A. Underwood.  On Beyond Baci: Sampling Designs That Might Reliably Detect Environmental Disturbances , 1994 .

[23]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[24]  D. Wardle,et al.  Terrestrial Ecosystem Responses to Species Gains and Losses , 2011, Science.

[25]  B. Gilbert,et al.  Plant invasions and extinction debts , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  James R. Bence,et al.  Analysis of Short Time Series: Correcting for Autocorrelation , 1995 .

[27]  W. Silver,et al.  Effects of Global Changes on Above- and Belowground Biodiversity in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Implications for Ecosystem Functioning , 2000 .

[28]  T. Romanuk,et al.  A meta-analysis of declines in local species richness from human disturbances , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[29]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts , 2014, Ecology and Evolution.

[30]  C. Mora,et al.  How Many Species Are There on Earth and in the Ocean? , 2011, PLoS biology.

[31]  D. Richardson,et al.  Delayed biodiversity change: no time to waste. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[33]  James H Brown,et al.  Species Invasions Exceed Extinctions on Islands Worldwide: A Comparative Study of Plants and Birds , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[34]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  GLOBE: Analytics for Assessing Global Representativeness , 2014, 2014 Fifth International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research and Application.

[35]  R. Julliard,et al.  Predictive ecology in a changing world , 2015 .

[36]  A. Magurran,et al.  Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  William J. Sydeman,et al.  Geographical limits to species-range shifts are suggested by climate velocity , 2014, Nature.

[38]  M. McKinney,et al.  Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals , 2008, Urban Ecosystems.

[39]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[40]  V. Devictor,et al.  Measuring community responses to large‐scale disturbance in conservation biogeography , 2009 .

[41]  J. Magnuson.  Long-Term Ecological Research and the Invisible Present , 1990 .

[42]  C. Thomas.  The Anthropocene could raise biological diversity , 2013, Nature.

[43]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss , 2018 .

[44]  Carrie V. Kappel,et al.  A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[45]  M. Pautasso,et al.  Scale dependence of the correlation between human population presence and vertebrate and plant species richness. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[46]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Statistical Models for the Meta-analysis of Nonindependent Data , 2013 .

[47]  Elise S Gornish,et al.  Climate-driven diversity loss in a grassland community , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  Accelerated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction , 2015, Science Advances.

[49]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  All Is Not Loss: Plant Biodiversity in the Anthropocene , 2012, PloS one.

[50]  W. Jetz,et al.  Global patterns and determinants of vascular plant diversity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Gregory R. Goldsmith,et al.  The field guide, rebooted , 2015, Science.

[52]  Ellen I. Damschen,et al.  Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems , 2015, Science Advances.

[53]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Towards a unified descriptive theory for spatial ecology: predicting biodiversity patterns across spatial scales , 2015 .

[54]  Thomas J. Stohlgren,et al.  EXOTIC PLANT SPECIES INVADE HOT SPOTS OF NATIVE PLANT DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[55]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[56]  R. Kays,et al.  Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[57]  A. Newton,et al.  Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis , 2009, Science.

[58]  R. Julliard,et al.  REVIEW: Predictive ecology in a changing world , 2015 .

[59]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world , 2008 .

[60]  Joel Rybicki,et al.  Species–fragmented area relationship , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[61]  A. Dobson,et al.  Projected Impacts of Climate and Land-Use Change on the Global Diversity of Birds , 2007, PLoS biology.