Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains?

A frequently made claim in the innovation literature is that important inventions involve the transfer of new knowledge from one technological domain to another. This study uses U.S. patents granted from 1976 to 2006 to identify the role of knowledge acquired from outside each patent's technological domain. Our results do not seem to support the claim above. Increasing citations to external prior art is a significantly less important predictor of forward citation frequency than citing prior art that is technologically closer. This result is robust across several model specifications and ways of defining whether each flow of knowledge is external. The result is even stronger in the most highly cited technology categories. We discuss possible explanations for this apparently negative impact of external knowledge—including both measurement issues and challenges associated with assimilating disparate knowledge.

[1]  Fernando Jiménez-Sáez,et al.  Mapping the importance of the real world: The validity of connectivity analysis of patent citations networks , 2011 .

[2]  G. Nemet.  Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change , 2009 .

[3]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor versus examiner citations in European patents , 2005 .

[4]  Chihiro Watanabe,et al.  Patent statistics: deciphering a ‘real’ versus a ‘pseudo’ proxy of innovation , 2001 .

[5]  Kristina Dahlin,et al.  When is an Invention Really Radical? Defining and Measuring Technological Radicalness , 2005 .

[6]  Araújo,et al.  An Evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[7]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity , 1986 .

[8]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[9]  Chung-Jen Chen,et al.  Predicting citations to biotechnology patents based on the information from the patent documents , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[10]  Nicolas van Zeebroeck,et al.  The puzzle of patent value indicators , 2011 .

[11]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[12]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[13]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Valuable Patents , 2003 .

[14]  Myriam Mariani,et al.  What determines technological hits? Geography vs. firm competencies , 2004 .

[15]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Mapping evolutionary trajectories: Applications to the growth and transformation of medical knowledge , 2007 .

[16]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The structure of invention , 2007 .

[17]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  M. Trajtenberg.  A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[19]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Interindustry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth: A Reexamination , 1984 .

[20]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Some critical episodes in the progress of medical innovation: An Anglo-American perspective , 2009 .

[23]  G. Duysters,et al.  The technological origins of radical inventions , 2010 .

[24]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Technological forecasting and social change , 2011 .

[25]  David Popp,et al.  Lessons from Patents: Using Patents to Measure Technological Change in Environmental Models , 2003 .

[26]  Partha Dasgupta,et al.  Economic policy and technological performance , 1987 .

[27]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[28]  F. Kodama,et al.  Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms , 2004 .

[29]  James Bessen.  The Value of U.S. Patents by Owner and Patent Characteristics , 2006 .

[30]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[31]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[32]  R. Nelson.  On the Uneven Evolution of Human Know-How , 2003 .

[33]  S. Colum Gilfillan,et al.  The sociology of invention : an essay in the social causes of technic invention and some of its social results; especially as demonstrated in the history of the ship , 1935 .

[34]  V. Ruttan.  Technology, Growth, and Development: An Induced Innovation Perspective , 2000 .

[35]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis , 2002 .

[36]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[37]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth , 1982 .

[38]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[39]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th-Century America , 1998 .

[40]  K. Hussinger,et al.  Costs and Benefits of Inter-Departmental Innovation Collaboration , 2011 .

[41]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  Technological Accumulation, Diversification and Organisation in UK Companies, 1945-1983 , 1989 .

[42]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Close to You? Bias and Precision in Patent-Based Measures of Technological Proximity , 2007 .

[43]  María García‐Vega.  Does technological diversification promote innovation?: An empirical analysis for European firms , 2006 .

[44]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions , 1999, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[45]  James E. Bessen,et al.  Patents and the Diffusion of Technical Information , 2004 .

[46]  Wing Bun Lee,et al.  Innovation and new technology for the new millenium , 2003 .

[47]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[48]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Technology Spillovers between Sectors and over Time. , 1999 .

[49]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  THE NBER/SLOAN PROJECT ON INDUSTRIAL TECHAIOLOGY AND PRODUCTIVITY: INCORPORATING LEARNING FROM PLANT VISITS AND INTERVIEWS INTO ECONOMIC RESEARCHt Knowledge Spillovers and Patent Citations: Evidence from a Survey of Inventors , 2000 .

[50]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States : Research Policy , 1987 .

[51]  Liisa-Maija Sainio,et al.  Appropriability Regime for Radical and Incremental Innovations , 2008 .

[52]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History , 1994 .

[53]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[54]  Mark Fichman,et al.  Today's Edisons or Weekend Hobbyists: Technical Merit and Success of Inventions by Independent Inventors , 2004 .

[55]  Mark A. Schankerman,et al.  Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators , 2004 .

[56]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[57]  David Popp,et al.  THEY DON'T INVENT THEM LIKE THEY USED TO: AN EXAMINATION OF ENERGY PATENT CITATIONS OVER TIME , 2005 .

[58]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[59]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Technology policy for a world of skew-distributed outcomes , 2000 .

[60]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[61]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density , 2006 .

[62]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[63]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Citations, Family Size, Opposition and the Value of Patent Rights Have Profited from Comments and Suggestions , 2002 .

[64]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[65]  R. Nelson,et al.  Factors behind cross-industry differences in technical progress , 1997 .

[66]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[67]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  Have university knowledge flows narrowed?: Evidence from patent data , 2009 .