Model-based iterative reconstruction for detection of subtle hypoattenuation in early cerebral infarction: a phantom study

AbstractPurposeModel-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) was recently shown to enable dose reduction in computed tomography (CT). The detectability of low-contrast lesions was assessed on CT images reconstructed with MBIR compared with the conventional filtered back-projection (FBP) method.Materials and methodsA phantom simulating brain gray matter containing small lesions mimicking early cerebral infarctions was scanned at tube currents of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mA. Images were reconstructed by use of both methods. Round regions were cropped from the reconstructed images, half with a lesion, the other half without. Eight radiologists reviewed the images and scored the certainty of lesion detection on a 5-point scale. Overall performance was analyzed by use of a receiver operating characteristic curve.ResultsFor the tube currents investigated, the analysis showed that the mean areas under the curves for the reviewers were 0.65, 0.70, 0.82, and 0.83 for FBP and 0.70, 0.76, 0.78, and 0.90 for MBIR. For each current, there was no significant difference between the areas under the curves for the different reconstruction methods (p = 0.32, 0.24, 0.49, and 0.17).ConclusionFor the small, low-contrast lesions in the phantom model used in this study, no significant difference between detectability was observed for MBIR and FBP.

[1]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for reduction of radiation dose in abdominopelvic CT: comparison to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction , 2013, SpringerPlus.

[2]  M. Körner,et al.  Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. , 2013, Radiology.

[3]  Arnold M. R. Schilham,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles , 2013, European Radiology.

[4]  Zhou Yu,et al.  Fast Model-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction Using Spatially Nonhomogeneous ICD Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Nancy A Obuchowski,et al.  Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Giger,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener spectrum. , 1984, Medical physics.

[7]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[8]  E. Ueno,et al.  Vascular diameter measurement in CT angiography: comparison of model-based iterative reconstruction and standard filtered back projection algorithms in vitro. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  David H. Kim,et al.  Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  E. Ueno,et al.  Improved Delineation of Arteries in the Posterior Fossa of the Brain by Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction in Volume-Rendered 3D CT Angiography , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique , 2012, European Radiology.

[13]  R Kötter,et al.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[14]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[15]  G A Vorona,et al.  The Use of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Head CT: A Feasibility Study , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[16]  L. Tanoue Computed Tomography — An Increasing Source of Radiation Exposure , 2009 .

[17]  Wan-Yuo Guo,et al.  How far can the radiation dose be lowered in head CT with iterative reconstruction? Analysis of imaging quality and diagnostic accuracy , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  Varut Vardhanabhuti,et al.  Image quality assessment of standard- and low-dose chest CT using filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and novel model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  K Doi,et al.  A comparison of physical image quality indices and observer performance in the radiographic detection of nylon beads. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Harrison H. Barrett,et al.  Foundations of Image Science , 2003, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  H. Sakuma,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction for multi-detector row CT assessment of the Adamkiewicz artery. , 2013, Radiology.

[22]  D. Sahani,et al.  Cranial CT with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction: Improved Image Quality with Concomitant Radiation Dose Reduction , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[23]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? , 2013, Radiology.

[24]  M. Vannier,et al.  Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? , 2009, Inverse problems.

[25]  James H Thrall,et al.  Comparison of image quality between conventional and low-dose nonenhanced head CT. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[26]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[27]  Yanqing Hua,et al.  Comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in brain CT. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[28]  K. Hanson,et al.  Detectability in computed tomographic images. , 1979, Medical physics.

[29]  K Doi,et al.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. I. Modulation transfer function. , 1984, Medical physics.

[30]  E. Ueno,et al.  Improved delineation of the anterior spinal artery with model-based iterative reconstruction in CT angiography: a clinical pilot study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Arnold M. R. Schilham,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality , 2013, European Radiology.

[32]  M. Goodsitt,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT. , 2013, Radiology.

[33]  D. Volders,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. , 2013, Radiology.

[34]  C D Claussen,et al.  Iterative Reconstruction in Head CT: Image Quality of Routine and Low-Dose Protocols in Comparison with Standard Filtered Back-Projection , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[35]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[36]  G. Erbaş,et al.  Lowering the Dose in Head CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction , 2011, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[37]  E. Shimosegawa,et al.  Effect of CT acquisition parameters in the detection of subtle hypoattenuation in acute cerebral infarction: a phantom study. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[38]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction versus adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection in liver 64-MDCT: focal lesion detection, lesion conspicuity, and image noise. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.