Analysis of Critical Infrastructure Network Failure in the European Union: A Combined Systems Engineering and Economic Model

Over the past few years, the European Commission has placed Critical Infrastructure Protection under the spotlight. Therefore, the Joint Research Centre is developing a tool to estimate the economic impact of Critical Infrastructure (CI) network failure, resulting from a hazard, on the regional or national level. This tool, which is presented in this study, is a combined Systems Engineering and Dynamic Inoperability Input–output model (SE-DIIM). The resilience of infrastructures and economic sectors, in terms of their ability to withstand and recover from disruptions, is included in the model. We discuss the model by analyzing the economic losses incurred in the 2003 Italian electricity network outage. The losses are estimated at both national and regional levels i.e. northern, central and southern parts of Italy and Sicily with a focus on 9 CI’s. We estimate that the economic loss for the case study under consideration is between €46 million and €173 million. We conclude that the combination of the SE and the DIIM components provides a complete framework for assessing the economic impact of critical infrastructure network failure on the national or regional level taking account of resilience.

[1]  Tim Chapman,et al.  A structured approach , 2003, Nature.

[2]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Resilience: An Evolutionary Approach to Spatial Economic Systems , 2001 .

[3]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Strategic Network Restoration , 2010 .

[4]  Geert Deconinck,et al.  A survey on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructures , 2006 .

[5]  J. Ali,et al.  Framework for evaluating economic impact of IT based disasters on the interdependent sectors of the US economy , 2012, 2012 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[6]  Stefano Panzieri,et al.  Fuzzy dynamic input-output inoperability model , 2011, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[7]  W. Leontief,et al.  The Structure of American Economy, 1919-1939. , 1954 .

[8]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[9]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  A Risk-based Input–Output Methodology for Measuring the Effects of the August 2003 Northeast Blackout , 2007 .

[10]  Adam Rose,et al.  Business interruption losses from natural hazards: conceptual and methodological issues in the case of the Northridge earthquake , 2002 .

[11]  David Ward,et al.  Assessing supply chain dependency on critical infrastructures using fuzzy cognitive maps , 2011 .

[12]  Jan Abrell,et al.  Combining Energy Networks , 2010 .

[13]  Vittorio Rosato,et al.  Topological properties of high-voltage electrical transmission networks , 2007 .

[14]  Karen Lowrie,et al.  Ten Most Important Accomplishments in Risk Analysis, 1980–2010 , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  Adam Rose,et al.  Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management A Framework for Analyzing the Total Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks and Natural Disasters , 2011 .

[16]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. II: Case Studies , 2005 .

[17]  A. Berizzi,et al.  The Italian 2003 blackout , 2004, IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting, 2004..

[18]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  System simulation for availability of weapon systems under various missions , 2005 .

[19]  J. P. Nordvik,et al.  A structured approach to identifying European critical infrastructures , 2010, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[20]  Andrés Silva,et al.  A modeling framework for the resilience analysis of networked systems-of-systems based on functional dependencies , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Peter D. Blair,et al.  Input-Output Analysis , 2021 .

[22]  James A. Constantine,et al.  SysML modeling of off-the-shelf-option acquisition for risk mitigation in military programs , 2010 .

[23]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures * , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  H. Stanley,et al.  Networks formed from interdependent networks , 2011, Nature Physics.

[25]  M. D. Nooij,et al.  The value of supply security The cost of power interruptions: Economic input for damage reduction and investment in networks , 2007 .

[26]  Wassily Leontief.  Input-Output Economics , 1966 .

[27]  L. Issacharoff,et al.  Influence of the topology on the power flux of the Italian high-voltage electrical network , 2009, 0909.1664.

[28]  Bart Los,et al.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT , 2013 .

[29]  M. Delfanti,et al.  Overview of the events and causes of the 2003 Italian blackout , 2006, 2006 IEEE PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[30]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input–output model , 2006 .

[31]  Kash Barker,et al.  Measuring the efficacy of inventory with a dynamic input-output model , 2010 .

[32]  J Ramirez-Marquez,et al.  Some metrics for assessing the vulnerability of complex networks: An application to an electric power system , 2011 .

[33]  Matthew Warren,et al.  Visualisation of critical infrastructure failure , 2008 .

[34]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology , 2005 .

[35]  A. Rose.  Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions , 2007 .

[36]  Lili Du,et al.  A Stochastic Optimization Model to Reduce Expected Post-Disaster Response Time Through Pre-Disaster Investment Decisions , 2014 .