Revealing dynamics and consequences of fit and misfit between formal and informal networks in multi-institutional product development collaborations

The study presents a longitudinal examination about dynamics and consequences of fit and misfit between formally ascribed design interfaces and informal communication networks in two large multi-institutional product development collaborations in space industry. Findings: (1) formally ascribed design interfaces and informal communication networks correlate only marginally. The main reason is that informal communication is much more dense than ascribed; (2) although the formally ascribed design interfaces change, the structure of informal communication remains largely stable throughout time; (3) the most intriguing finding is that this communicational misfit is associated with higher effectiveness, but, it negatively impacts the institutional unit's efficiency.

[1]  R. F. Lovelace,et al.  Stimulating creativity through managerial intervention , 1986 .

[2]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  The social structure of leadership and creativity in engineering design teams: An empirical analysis , 2008 .

[3]  Gabriel Szulanski Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[4]  E. Durkheim,et al.  De la Division du Travail Social. , 1894 .

[5]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[6]  R. Nelson THE STRENGTH OF STRONG TIES: SOCIAL NETWORKS AND INTERGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS , 1989 .

[7]  T. M. Amabile The social psychology of creativity , 1984 .

[8]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Stage-gate systems: A new tool for managing new products , 1990 .

[9]  Harry Nyström,et al.  Creativity and Innovation , 1979 .

[10]  J. Dawson,et al.  It's what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes , 2001 .

[11]  Michael S. Dahl,et al.  Knowledge flows through informal contacts in industrial clusters: myth or reality? , 2004 .

[12]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[13]  L. Festinger Social pressures in informal groups : a study of human factors in housing / by Leon Festinger, Stanley Schachter and Kurt Back , 1950 .

[14]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[15]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[16]  H. Wögerbauer Die Technik des Konstruierens , 1943 .

[17]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[18]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[19]  Steven Casper,et al.  How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the San Diego biotechnology cluster , 2007 .

[20]  T. Clark,et al.  Within and Beyond Communities of Practice: Making Sense of Learning Through Participation, Identity and Practice , 2006 .

[21]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[22]  J. Pinto,et al.  Variations in Critical Success Factors Over the Stages in the Project Life Cycle , 1988 .

[23]  H. G. Heneman,et al.  Comparisons of self- and superior ratings of managerial performance. , 1974 .

[24]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[25]  Karin Garrety,et al.  Integrating communities of practice in technology development projects , 2004 .

[26]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[27]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[28]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams , 2004 .

[29]  Wenpin Tsai Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2001 .

[30]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Information Leaders in Product Development Organizational Networks: Social Network Analysis of the Design Structure Matrix , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[31]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other? , 2007 .

[32]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Homogeneity in confiding relations , 1988 .

[33]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  An empirically derived new product project selection model , 1981 .

[34]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[35]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Positions in Networks , 1976 .

[36]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[38]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[39]  A. Flache The rational weakness of strong ties: Failure of group solidarity in a highly cohesive group of rational agents , 2002 .

[40]  B. Cohen,et al.  Status processes in enduring work groups. , 1991 .

[41]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[42]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies , 2006 .

[43]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Christina E. Shalley,et al.  Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity , 1995 .

[45]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[46]  B. Dousset Innovation and network structural dynamics: Study of the alliance network of a major sector of the biotechnology industry , 2005 .

[47]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[48]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Determinants of Goal Commitment , 1988 .

[49]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[50]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[51]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Team Polarity and Creative Performance in Innovation Teams , 2006 .

[52]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations , 1994 .

[53]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects , 2001 .

[54]  Ali A. Yassine,et al.  Engineering design management: An information structure approach , 1999 .

[55]  S. Borgatti,et al.  Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration , 2002 .

[56]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: a social network perspective , 2003 .

[57]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[58]  Oskar Grün Taming giant projects , 2004 .

[59]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[60]  Jay R. Galbraith Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[61]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[62]  Nadine Roijakkers,et al.  Inter-firm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks , 2006 .

[63]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[64]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[65]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[66]  Scott L. Feld,et al.  Structural embeddedness and stability of interpersonal relations , 1997 .

[67]  J. Coleman Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[68]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[69]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. , 1997 .

[70]  S. Feld Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .