Evolution of collective commitment during reconfiguration

In this paper we aim to describe dynamic aspects of social and collective attitudes in teams of agents involved in Cooperative Problem Solving (CPS). Particular attention is given to the strongest motivational attitude, collective commitment, and its evolution during team action. First, building on our previous work, a logical framework is sketched in which all relevant social and collective attitudes are formalized. Two de nitions of collective commitments are given, both based on social plans, but appropriate in di erent contexts, obeying particular properties with respect to the team's organization. Moreover, a dynamic logic component is added to this framework in order to capture the e ects of the complex actions that are involved in the consecutive stages of CPS, namely potential recognition, team formation, plan formation and team action. During team action, the collective commitment leads to the execution of agent-speci c actions. A dynamic and unpredictable environment may, however, cause the failure of some of these actions, or present the agents with new opportunities. The abstract recon guration algorithm, presented in a previous paper, is designed to handle the replanning needed in such situations in an eÆcient way. In this paper, we use the dynamic logic component of the logical framework to describe intended dynamic properties of the team's collective commitment during recon guration.

[1]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities , 2000, CIA.

[2]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Collective Intentions , 2002, Fundam. Informaticae.

[3]  Gil Tidhar,et al.  Social and Individual Commitment , 1996, PRICAI Workshop on Intelligent Agent Systems.

[4]  Diego Gambetta Can We Trust Trust , 2000 .

[5]  Natalie S. Glance,et al.  Knowledge Pump: Supporting the Flow and Use of Knowledge , 1998 .

[6]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  The role of dialogue in collective problem solving , 2000 .

[7]  S. Griffis EDITOR , 1997, Journal of Navigation.

[8]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Reasoning about knowledge , 1995 .

[9]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Principles of trust for MAS: cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[10]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  A reconfiguration algorithm for distributed problem solving , 2001 .

[11]  Rineke,et al.  Collective Commitments , 2001 .

[12]  C. Sierra,et al.  REGRET: A reputation model for gregarious societies , 2001 .

[13]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  Commitments: From Individual Intentions to Groups and Organizations , 1995, ICMAS.

[14]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Cooperative Problem solving , 1992, Computation: The Micro and the Macro View.

[15]  Catholijn M. Jonker,et al.  Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust Based on Experiences , 1999, MAAMAW.

[16]  Josep Lluís de la Rosa i Esteva,et al.  Opinion-Based Filtering through Trust , 2002, CIA.

[17]  Luc Steels,et al.  Grounding adaptive language games in robotic agents , 1997 .

[18]  Barbara Dunin-Keplicz,et al.  Collective Motivational Attitudes in Cooperative Problem Solving , 1999, CEEMAS.