A major focus of the psychology of instruction is understanding and facilitating the changes in cognition and performance that occur as an individual moves from low to higher competence in a domain of knowledge and skill. A new program of research which examines the initial state of the learner as a component of this transition in competence is described in this 8-part document. Part 1 introduces two previous attempts to relate aptitude to instruction: differential aptitude tests and aptitude treatment interaction. Part 2 provides an overview of the two general research approaches to aptitude analysis, the cognitive correlates approach and the cognitive components approach. The approach taken in the present research effortis described as a task analytic approach that considers basic processes, executive strategies, and content knowledge in aptitude test performances of skilled and less skilled individuals. Part 3 considers the relationship between inductive reasoning and general ability. Common generic properties of inductive tasks are discussed as are different types of inductive items on aptitude tests. Part 4 outlines earlier theories on analogical reasoning performance. Problem features, processing models, item processing data and theory, item errors, and performance are analyzed for figural, numerical, and verbal analogy solutions in parts 5 through 7. A final part discusses results_ of research, concluding that a number of interrelated factorS differentiate high and low skill individuals. These factors include management of memory load, organization of an appropriate knowledge base, and procedural knowledge of task constraints. (LP) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** 0 ANALYZING APTITUDES FOR LEARNING: INDUCTIVE REASONING
[1]
W. K. Estes,et al.
Learning Theory and Intelligence.
,
1974
.
[2]
E. Hunt,et al.
Individual Differences in Cognition: A New Approach to Intelligence
,
1973
.
[3]
R Wood,et al.
Aptitude and achievement
,
1982
.
[4]
Allen Newell,et al.
Human Problem Solving.
,
1973
.
[5]
Susan E. Whitely,et al.
Solving verbal analogies: Some cognitive components of intelligence test items.
,
1976
.
[6]
Herbert A. Simon,et al.
Process models and stochastic theories of simple concept formation
,
1967
.
[7]
E. Hunt.
Mechanics of Verbal Ability.
,
1978
.
[8]
David E. Rumelhart,et al.
Introduction to human information processing
,
1977
.
[9]
Paul I. Jacobs,et al.
Evaluating the Teaching of Intelligence1
,
1972
.
[10]
James W. Pellegrino,et al.
The components of a componential analysis
,
1979
.
[11]
R. Glaser,et al.
Components of geometric analogy solution
,
1980,
Cognitive Psychology.
[12]
R. Glaser,et al.
Process training derived from a computer simulation theory
,
1976,
Memory & cognition.