Possibilities and limitations of the time-correlated single photon counting technique: a comparative study of correction methods for the wavelength dependence of the instrument response function

Abstract One of the principal reasons for poor fits in time-correlated single photon counting fluorescence decay measurements is the wavelength dependence of the instrument response function. Over the years several correction methods have been developed to account for or correct for this effect. The most recent and widely used procedures are critically compared in this paper. A comparison of the channel shift technique, the pseudoscatterer technique, the excitation pulse-shape mimic technique and the delta function convolution method demonstrates that the latter method is the superior one. This method requires the measurement of the fluorescence decay of a reference compound with single exponential decay kinetics under identical conditions as used for the sample. A modified functional form is used to describe the sample decay law. Since no experimental data are altered in any way, a correct residual analysis is possible. Simulations show that fluorescence lifetimes can be recovered accurately, as long as the reference decay time is sufficiently different from that of the sample. Biexponential decays can be resolved successfully when the two decay times are well separated and different from that of the reference. The difference between the standard normal variates of chi-square for single and double exponential fits can be used to distinguish between mono- and bi-exponential decays. The usefulness of the delta function convolution method is demonstrated by fluorescence decay measurements of a series of different samples with very short decay times. Fluorescence lifetimes as short as 10 ps could be resolved accurately and reliably.

[1]  A. McKinnon,et al.  Correction of instrumental time response variation with wavelength in fluorescence lifetime determinations in the ultraviolet region , 1977 .

[2]  Michael Zuker,et al.  Delta function convolution method (DFCM) for fluorescence decay experiments , 1985 .

[3]  D. Lenoir,et al.  Sterisch gehinderte Olefine, VIII. Reaktion von 1-Indanonen mit niedrigwertigen Titanverbindungen. Sterischer Einfluß von Methylsubstituenten bei 1-(1-Indanyliden)indan und 9-(9-Fluorenyliden)fluoren , 1980 .

[4]  M. Tachiya Application of a generating function to reaction kinetics in micelles. Kinetics of quenching of luminescent probes in micelles , 1975 .

[5]  Colin Lewis,et al.  The Measurement of Short‐Lived Fluorescence Decay Using the Single Photon Counting Method , 1973 .

[6]  J. Beechem,et al.  Global resolution of heterogeneous decay by phase/modulation fluorometry: mixtures and proteins , 1983 .

[7]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[8]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Picosecond study of an intermediate in the trans to cis isomerization pathway of stiff stilbene , 1984 .

[9]  L. Brand,et al.  Analysis of fluorescence decay curves by means of the Laplace transformation. , 1975, Biophysical journal.

[10]  S. Provencher,et al.  Double beam fluorescence lifetime spectrometer with subnanosecond resolution: Application to aqueous tryptophan , 1982 .

[11]  G. Fleming,et al.  On the origin of nonexponential fluorescence decay in tryptophan and its derivatives , 1983 .

[12]  R. Dowben,et al.  Subnanosecond single photon counting fluorescence spectroscopy using synchronously pumped tunable dye laser excitation. , 1978, The Review of scientific instruments.

[13]  A. Blumen,et al.  On the concentration and time dependence of the energy transfer to randomly distributed acceptors , 1979 .

[14]  A. McKinnon,et al.  Confidence in fluorescence lifetime determinations: a ratio correction for the photomultiplier time response with wavelength , 1976 .

[15]  L. Hoffland,et al.  Subnanosecond time-correlated photon counting with tunable lasers. , 1978, The Review of scientific instruments.

[16]  N. Boens,et al.  Fluorescence decay of α-chymotrypsin studied by the picosecond-resolved single photon-counting technique , 1985 .

[17]  H. Masuhara,et al.  Configurational and conformational aspects in the excimer formation of bis(carbazoles) , 1985 .

[18]  W. Ware,et al.  Kinetics of Diffusion-Controlled Reactions. An Experimental Test of the Theory as Applied to Fluorescence Quenching , 1966 .

[19]  M. Ameloot,et al.  Criteria for model evaluation in the case of deconvolution calculations , 1982 .

[20]  C. Eisenhart,et al.  Tables for Testing Randomness of Grouping in a Sequence of Alternatives , 1943 .

[21]  A. G. Szabo,et al.  The deconvolution of photoluminescence data , 1977 .

[22]  William R. Ware,et al.  Performance characteristics of a small side‐window photomultiplier in laser single‐photon fluorescence decay measurements , 1983 .

[23]  Norman R. Draper,et al.  Applied regression analysis (2. ed.) , 1981, Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics.

[24]  Jay R. Knutson,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of multiple fluorescence decay curves: A global approach , 1983 .

[25]  A Grinvald,et al.  On the analysis of fluorescence decay kinetics by the method of least-squares. , 1974, Analytical biochemistry.

[26]  N. Boens,et al.  Picosecond lifetime determination of the second excited singlet state of xanthione in solution , 1984 .

[27]  T. I. Quickenden,et al.  Criterion of goodness of fit for deconvolution calculations , 1981 .

[28]  R. Verrall,et al.  Excitation pulse-shape mimic technique for improving picosecond-laser-excited time-correlated single-photon counting deconvolutions , 1983 .