Numerical investigation of the active role of the actin cytoskeleton in the compression resistance of cells.

Numerous in-vitro studies have established that cells react to their physical environment and to applied mechanical loading. However, the mechanisms underlying such phenomena are poorly understood. Previous modelling of cell compression considered the cell as a passive homogenous material, requiring an artificial increase in the stiffness of spread cells to replicate experimentally measured forces. In this study, we implement a fully 3D active constitutive formulation that predicts the distribution, remodelling, and contractile behaviour of the cytoskeleton. Simulations reveal that polarised and axisymmetric spread cells contain stress fibres which form dominant bundles that are stretched during compression. These dominant fibres exert tension; causing an increase in computed compression forces compared to round cells. In contrast, fewer stress fibres are computed for round cells and a lower resistance to compression is predicted. The effect of different levels of cellular contractility associated with different cell phenotypes is also investigated. Highly contractile cells form more dominant circumferential stress fibres and hence provide greater resistance to compression. Computed predictions correlate strongly with published experimentally observed trends of compression resistance as a function of cellular contractility and offer an insight into the link between cell geometry, stress fibre distribution and contractility, and cell deformability. Importantly, it is possible to capture the behaviour of both round and spread cells using a given, unchanged set of material parameters for each cell type. Finally, it is demonstrated that stress distributions in the cell cytoplasm and nucleus computed using the active formulation differ significantly from those computed using passive material models.

[1]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Cees W J Oomens,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of single attached cells under compression. , 2005, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  S. Jarvis,et al.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Role of Stress Fiber Contractility in the Resistance of Osteoblasts to Compression , 2013, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[4]  Dennis E Discher,et al.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells ‘feel’ outside and in? , 2010, Journal of Cell Science.

[5]  R. Franke,et al.  Induction of human vascular endothelial stress fibres by fluid shear stress , 1984, Nature.

[6]  J. P. McGarry,et al.  Characterization of Cell Mechanical Properties by Computational Modeling of Parallel Plate Compression , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  K. Trybus,et al.  Smooth muscle myosin cross-bridge interactions modulate actin filament sliding velocity in vitro , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  Jianping Fu,et al.  Cell shape and substrate rigidity both regulate cell stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[9]  F. Vernerey,et al.  A constrained mixture approach to mechano-sensing and force generation in contractile cells. , 2011, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[10]  Zhibing Zhang,et al.  Biomechanical properties of single chondrocytes and chondrons determined by micromanipulation and finite-element modelling , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  Biomechanics of single chondrocytes under direct shear , 2010, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[12]  A. Rowat,et al.  Characterization of the elastic properties of the nuclear envelope , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[13]  P. Butler,et al.  Finite-Element Stress Analysis of a Multicomponent Model of Sheared and Focally-Adhered Endothelial Cells , 2007 .

[14]  Dennis E. Discher,et al.  Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Knight,et al.  Mechanical compression influences intracellular Ca2+ signaling in chondrocytes seeded in agarose constructs. , 2001, Journal of applied physiology.

[16]  D. Potter,et al.  Calpain Regulates Actin Remodeling during Cell Spreading , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  H. Pasolli,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase modulates tension signaling to control actin and focal adhesion dynamics , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  N. Caille,et al.  Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Kyriacos A Athanasiou,et al.  In situ mechanical properties of the chondrocyte cytoplasm and nucleus. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Amit Pathak,et al.  The simulation of stress fibre and focal adhesion development in cells on patterned substrates , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[21]  W. R. Jones,et al.  Alterations in the Young's modulus and volumetric properties of chondrocytes isolated from normal and osteoarthritic human cartilage. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  A. Evans,et al.  A model for the contractility of the cytoskeleton including the effects of stress-fibre formation and dissociation , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[23]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[24]  O. Thoumine,et al.  Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. , 1997, Journal of cell science.

[25]  Dan L. Bader,et al.  Anisotropic, Three-Dimensional Deformation of Single Attached Cells Under Compression , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Katsuya Sato,et al.  Local Disassembly of Actin Stress Fibers Induced by Selected Release of Intracellular Tension in Osteoblastic Cell , 2006 .

[27]  Gang-Yu Liu,et al.  Cell mechanics using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell compression. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  F. Byfield,et al.  Endothelial actin and cell stiffness is modulated by substrate stiffness in 2D and 3D. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  P. McHugh,et al.  Modelling of in vitro chondrocyte detachment , 2008 .

[30]  Vikram Deshpande,et al.  A bio-mechanical model for coupling cell contractility with focal adhesion formation , 2008 .

[31]  T. Laursen,et al.  Determination of the Poisson's ratio of the cell: recovery properties of chondrocytes after release from complete micropipette aspiration. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  T. Andriacchi,et al.  Chondrocyte cells respond mechanically to compressive loads , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  K. Athanasiou,et al.  Strain-dependent Recovery Behavior of Single Chondrocytes , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[34]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Focal adhesion size controls tension-dependent recruitment of α-smooth muscle actin to stress fibers , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[36]  P. Lappalainen,et al.  Mechanisms of actin stress fibre assembly , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[37]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[38]  C. Oomens,et al.  Decreased mechanical stiffness in LMNA-/- cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: implications for the development of laminopathies. , 2004, Human molecular genetics.

[39]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  An axisymmetric boundary integral model for assessing elastic cell properties in the micropipette aspiration contact problem. , 2002, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[40]  Pekka Lappalainen,et al.  Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells , 2006, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  A theoretical description of elastic pillar substrates in biophysical experiments. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[42]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[43]  A. Gefen,et al.  Confocal-based cell-specific finite element modeling extended to study variable cell shapes and intracellular structures: the example of the adipocyte. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[45]  J. Kolega,et al.  Effects of mechanical tension on protrusive activity and microfilament and intermediate filament organization in an epidermal epithelium moving in culture , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[46]  J. Broers,et al.  Role of nuclear lamina-cytoskeleton interactions in the maintenance of cellular strength. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[47]  Margaret L. Gardel,et al.  Tension is required but not sufficient for focal adhesion maturation without a stress fiber template , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  Roland Kaunas,et al.  A kinematic model of stretch-induced stress fiber turnover and reorientation. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.