Technological innovation systems in contexts: conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics

This paper addresses interactions between technological innovation systems (TIS) and wider "context structures". While TIS studies have always considered various kinds of contextual influences, we suggest that the TIS framework can be further strengthened by a more elaborated conceptualization of TIS context structures and TIS-context interactions. For that purpose, we identify and discuss four especially important types of context structures: technological, sectorial, geographical and political. For each of these, we provide examples of different ways in which context structures can interact with a focal TIS and how our understanding of TIS dynamics is enhanced by considering them explicitly. Lessons for analysts are given and a research agenda is outlined.

[1]  N. Bento,et al.  Spatial diffusion and the formation of a technological innovation system in the receiving country: The case of wind energy in Portugal , 2015 .

[2]  Naubahar Sharif,et al.  Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept , 2006 .

[3]  Stefan Kuhlmann,et al.  Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change , 2007 .

[4]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Innovation systems: analytical and methodological issues , 2002 .

[5]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Democratizing innovation: The evolving phenomenon of user innovation , 2005 .

[6]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Creating and shaping innovation systems: Formal networks in the innovation system for stationary fuel cells in Germany , 2011 .

[7]  Jacco Farla,et al.  Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[8]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[9]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: The case of biofuels in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[10]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  ‘Legitimation’ and ‘development of positive externalities’: two key processes in the formation phase of technological innovation systems , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[11]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework , 2008 .

[12]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .

[13]  Teknologiska innovationssystem inom energiområdet : En praktisk vägledning till identifiering av systemsvagheter som motiverar särskilda politiska åtaganden , 2014 .

[14]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the failure of the Dutch innovation system for biomass digestion : A functional analysis , 2007 .

[15]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building , 2012 .

[16]  M. Fromhold-Eisebith,et al.  Trajectories of sustainability transitions in scale-transcending innovation systems: The case of photovoltaics , 2015 .

[17]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Innovation Studies Utrecht ( ISU ) Working Paper Series Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems : a framework for policy makers and innovation scholars , 2011 .

[18]  A. Hoffman,et al.  Organizational Fields Past, Present and Future , 2016 .

[19]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? , 2011 .

[20]  Brendan Haley Low-carbon innovation from a hydroelectric base: The case of electric vehicles in Québec , 2015 .

[21]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[22]  B. Truffer,et al.  Market Formation in Technological Innovation Systems—Diffusion of Photovoltaic Applications in Germany , 2011 .

[23]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  A Framework for Guiding Policy-makers Intervening in Emerging Innovation Systems in ‘Catching-Up’ Countries , 2006 .

[24]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  Explaining regime destabilisation in the pulp and paper industry , 2012 .

[25]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[26]  R. Boschma Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment , 2005 .

[27]  Ingrid Mignon,et al.  Who invests in renewable electricity production? Empirical evidence and suggestions for further research , 2013 .

[28]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[29]  Yonglong Lu,et al.  Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: The case of onsite wastewater treatment in China , 2012 .

[30]  W. Brian Arthur,et al.  The Nature of Technology: What it Is and How it Evolves , 2009 .

[31]  V. Lauber,et al.  Three Decades of Renewable Electricity Policies in Germany , 2004 .

[32]  Anna Bergek,et al.  Self-reinforcing Mechanisms in a Multi-technology Industry: Understanding Sustained Technological Variety in a Context of Path Dependency , 2015 .

[33]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic policy: the diffusion of factory automation in Sweden , 1994 .

[34]  F. Geels Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[35]  Linda M. Kamp,et al.  A comparative analysis of Photovoltaic Technological Innovation Systems including international dimensions: the cases of Japan and The Netherlands , 2013 .

[36]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[37]  H. Rohracher,et al.  Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change , 2012 .

[38]  D. Sperling,et al.  Car manufacturers’ changing political strategies on the ZEV mandate , 2014 .

[39]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[40]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[41]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[42]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[43]  Björn Andersson,et al.  Monitoring and assessing technology choice: the case of solar cells , 2000 .

[44]  Lars Coenen,et al.  The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech , 2015 .

[45]  B. Asheim,et al.  Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge , 2002 .

[46]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies , 2012 .

[47]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Conceptual confusion – an analysis of the meaning of concepts in technological innovation systems and sociological functionalism , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[48]  J. Meadowcroft Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[49]  D. Hess Sustainability transitions: A political coalition perspective , 2014 .

[50]  K. Ingold,et al.  Socio-Technical Transitions and Policy Change - Advocacy Coalitions in Swiss Energy Policy , 2016 .

[51]  F. Rothaermel Complementary Assets, Strategic Alliances, and the Incumbent's Advantage: An Empirical Study of Industry and Firm Effects in the Biopharmaceutical Industry , 2001 .

[52]  Kornelia Konrad,et al.  Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment , 2012 .

[53]  Gregory C. Unruh Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[54]  Kersti Karltorp,et al.  Mechanisms blocking the dynamics of the European offshore wind energy innovation system - Challenges for policy intervention , 2013 .

[55]  Kersti Karltorp,et al.  Formation of competences to realize the potential of offshore wind power in the European Union , 2012 .

[56]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[57]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[58]  Nile W. Hatch,et al.  As Time Goes By: From the Industrial Revolutions to the Information Revolution , 2002 .

[59]  Ruud Smits,et al.  A System-Evolutionary Approach for Innovation Policy , 2010 .

[60]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[61]  T. Schmidt,et al.  Explaining the diffusion of biogas in India: a new functional approach considering national borders and technology transfer , 2014 .

[62]  Herbert Kitschelt,et al.  Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies , 1986, British Journal of Political Science.

[63]  P. Hall,et al.  Varieties of Capitalism , 2001 .

[64]  Raimo Lovio,et al.  Comparing Alternative Path Creation Frameworks in the Context of Emerging Biofuel Fields in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland , 2012 .

[65]  Paul Ekins,et al.  The development of wind power in China, Europe and the USA: how have policies and innovation system activities co-evolved? , 2013, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[66]  Tobias S. Schmidt,et al.  An analysis of remote electric mini-grids in Laos using the Technological Innovation Systems approach , 2015 .

[67]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[68]  Ksenia Onufrey Technology Dynamics in Multi-Technology Industries : Selection and Variety Creation through the Lens of Path Dependency and Path Generation , 2014 .

[69]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[70]  Anders Malmberg,et al.  Building global knowledge pipelines: The role of temporary clusters , 2006 .

[71]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[72]  Arend Lijphart Patterns of democracy : government forms and performance in thirty-six countries , 2000 .

[73]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The structuration of socio-technical regimes—Conceptual foundations from institutional theory , 2014 .

[74]  F. Geels From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory , 2004 .

[75]  Geert Verbong,et al.  Exploring policy protection in biofuel niche development : a policy and strategic niche management analysis of Dutch and Swedish biofuel development, 1970-2010 , 2003 .

[76]  T. Bunnell,et al.  Spaces and scales of innovation , 2001 .

[77]  F. Berkhout,et al.  The diffusion of a renewable energy technology and innovation system functioning: Comparing bio-digestion in Kenya and Rwanda , 2015 .

[78]  Ken Green,et al.  Technology and the Market: Demand, Users and Innovation , 2001 .

[79]  P. Oinas,et al.  The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems , 2002 .

[80]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[81]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Competition between first and second generation technologies: Lessons from the formation of a biofuels innovation system in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[82]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Why space matters in technological innovation systems – the global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology , 2014 .

[83]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Cumulative causation in biofuels development: a critical comparison of the Netherlands and Sweden , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[84]  B. Truffer,et al.  The impact of privatization on sustainability transitions: A comparative analysis of dynamic capabilities in three water utilities , 2015 .

[85]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Inducement and blocking mechanisms in the development of a new industry: the case of renewable energy technology in Sweden , 2001 .

[86]  Björn A. Sandén,et al.  A framework for analysis of multi-mode interaction among technologies with examples from the history of alternative transport fuels in Sweden , 2011 .

[87]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[88]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Functions in innovation systems: A framework for analysing energy system dynamics and identifying goals for system-building activities by entrepreneurs and policy makers , 2008 .

[89]  B. Carlsson Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature ☆ , 2006 .

[90]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism , 2017 .

[91]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Policy Mixes, Policy Interplay and Low Carbon Transitions: The Case of Passenger Transport in Finland , 2014 .

[92]  R. Quitzow Dynamics of a policy-driven market: The co-evolution of technological innovation systems for solar photovoltaics in China and Germany , 2015 .

[93]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .

[94]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology , 2013 .

[95]  Yuan-Chieh Chang,et al.  Comparing approaches to systems of innovation: The knowledge perspective , 2004 .

[96]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[97]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The Local Sources of Market Formation: Explaining Regional Growth Differentials in German Photovoltaic Markets , 2012 .

[98]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Context matters: How existing sectors and competing technologies affect the prospects of the Swiss Bio-SNG innovation system , 2011 .