Global warming impact assessment of a crop residue gasification project—A dynamic LCA perspective

Bioenergy from crop residues is one of the prevailing sustainable energy sources owing to the abundant reserves worldwide. Amongst a wide variety of energy conversion technologies, crop residue gasification has been regarded as promising owing to its higher energy efficiency than that of direct combustion. However, prior to large-scale application of crop residue gasification, the lifetime environmental performance should be investigated to shed light on sustainable strategies. As traditional static life cycle assessment (LCA) does not include temporal information for dynamic processes, we proposed a dynamic life cycle assessment approach, which improves the static LCA approach by considering time-varying factors, e.g., greenhouse gas characterization factors and energy intensity. As the gasification project can reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) discharge compared with traditional direct fuel combustion, trade-offs between the benefits of global warming mitigation and the impact on global warming of crop residue gasification should be considered. Therefore, indicators of net global warming mitigation benefit and global warming impact mitigation period are put forward to justify the feasibility of the crop residue gasification project. The proposed dynamic LCA and indicators were then applied to estimate the life cycle global warming impact of a crop residue gasification system in China. Results show that the crop residue gasification project has high net global warming mitigation benefit and a short global warming impact mitigation period, indicating its prominent potential in alleviating global warming impact. During the lifetime of the project, the largest emitters of the crop residue gasification project are the operation and construction stages, attributed mainly to the consumption of crop residue, electricity and steel. In addition, the comparison of the results obtained with both traditional and dynamic LCA approaches indicates that there is an exaggeration of the global warming impact reduction potential of crop residue gasification projects. This dynamic LCA can also make the decision maker acknowledge the real-time GHG performance during the lifetime of a production process, and thus make timely decisions to minimize the lifetime GHG emissions.

[1]  Marco Frey,et al.  Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy , 2011 .

[2]  John Barrett,et al.  Identification of 'carbon hot-spots' and quantification of GHG intensities in the biodiesel supply chain using hybrid LCA and structural path analysis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Ge Chen,et al.  Embodied carbon dioxide emission at supra-national scale: A coalition analysis for G7, BRIC, and the rest of the world , 2011 .

[4]  Lidia Lombardi,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and exergetic life cycle assessment (ELCA) of the production of biodiesel from used cooking oil (UCO) , 2010 .

[5]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[6]  Alberto Coronas,et al.  Modeling of trigeneration configurations based on biomass gasification and comparison of performance. , 2014 .

[7]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels’ greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum , 2009 .

[8]  Sven Bernesson,et al.  A limited LCA comparing large- and small-scale production of ethanol for heavy engines under Swedish conditions , 2006 .

[9]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Environmental assessment of post-consumer wood and forest residues gasification: The case study of Barcelona metropolitan area , 2010 .

[10]  Donatella Zona,et al.  Energy and climate benefits of bioelectricity from low-input short rotation woody crops on agricultural land over a two-year rotation , 2013 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[12]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Jerald L Schnoor Cellulosic biofuels disappoint. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  J. Munksgaard,et al.  Energy and CO2 life-cycle analyses of wind turbines—review and applications , 2002 .

[15]  G. Q. Chen,et al.  Energy cost of rapeseed-based biodiesel as alternative energy in China , 2011 .

[16]  Ling Shao,et al.  Low-carbon assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland in Beijing , 2011 .

[17]  Benoit Gabrielle,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of straw use in bio-ethanol production: a case study based on biophysical modelling. , 2008 .

[18]  Alberto Traverso,et al.  Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas H. Bradley,et al.  Net energy and greenhouse gas emission evaluation of biodiesel derived from microalgae. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  Pomthong Malakul,et al.  Life-cycle energy and environmental analysis of bioethanol production from cassava in Thailand. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[21]  T. Richard Challenges in Scaling Up Biofuels Infrastructure , 2010, Science.

[22]  Qing Yang,et al.  Nonrenewable energy cost of corn-ethanol in China. , 2012 .

[23]  Janet Ann ranganathan,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Protocol , 2004 .

[24]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[25]  Kiyoshi Dowaki,et al.  A Life Cycle Analysis on a Bio-DME production system considering the species of biomass feedstock in Japan and Papua New Guinea , 2010 .

[26]  Thapat Silalertruksa,et al.  A comparative LCA of rice straw utilization for fuels and fertilizer in Thailand. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[27]  M. J. Huang,et al.  Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings , 2013 .

[28]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Biogenic Carbon and Temporary Storage Addressed with Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[29]  Toolseeram Ramjeawon,et al.  Life cycle assessment of electricity generation from bagasse in Mauritius , 2008 .

[30]  Qing Yang,et al.  Nonrenewable Energy Cost and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of a “Pig-Biogas-Fish” System in China , 2012, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[31]  Jens Buchgeister,et al.  A LCA (life cycle assessment) of the methanol production from sugarcane bagasse , 2011 .

[32]  Davide Tonini,et al.  LCA of biomass-based energy systems: A case study for Denmark , 2012 .

[33]  M. Margni,et al.  Considering time in LCA: dynamic LCA and its application to global warming impact assessments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  G. Q. Chen,et al.  Renewability of wind power in China: A case study of nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emission by a plant in Guangxi , 2011 .

[35]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life cycle assessment of two alternative bioenergy systems involving Salix spp. biomass: Bioethanol production and power generation , 2012 .

[36]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[37]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Embodied impacts of traditional clay versus modern concrete houses in a tropical regime , 2012 .

[38]  Chao Fu,et al.  Energy–environment–economy assessment of waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: Model development and case study , 2014 .

[39]  Stefan Muench,et al.  A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments , 2013 .

[40]  Tommy Dalgaard,et al.  Looking at Biofuels and Bioenergy , 2006, Science.

[41]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of CCS chains – Lessons learned and limitations from LCA literature , 2013 .

[42]  Jan S Fuglestvedt,et al.  Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[43]  Liu Fei Carbon footprint on steel manufacturing process—A case study of Nanjing Iron & Steel Union Company Limited , 2013 .

[44]  Yongchun Zhao,et al.  Nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emissions of a 1.5 MW solar power tower plant in China , 2011 .

[45]  Xi Ji,et al.  Exergetic evaluation of corn-ethanol production in China , 2009 .

[46]  John E. Hermansen,et al.  Environmental assessment of gasification technology for biomass conversion to energy in comparison with other alternatives: the case of wheat straw , 2013 .

[47]  D. Lashof,et al.  Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming , 1990, Nature.

[48]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study , 2010 .

[49]  Bin Chen,et al.  Life-cycle energy production and emissions mitigation by comprehensive biogas-digestate utilization. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[50]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Emission Scenarios , 2001 .

[51]  D. Zhuang,et al.  Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: Availability and distribution , 2012 .

[52]  Qing Yang,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions of corn–ethanol production in China , 2013 .

[53]  Ling Shao,et al.  Embodied energy assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland , 2013 .

[54]  Shuying Yang,et al.  A Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Nonrenewable Energy and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions of a Village-Level Biomass Gasification Project in China , 2012 .

[55]  T Rehl,et al.  CO2 abatement costs of greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation by different biogas conversion pathways. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[56]  J. Melillo,et al.  Indirect Emissions from Biofuels: How Important? , 2009, Science.

[57]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[58]  Wei Lu,et al.  Life-cycle implications of using crop residues for various energy demands in China. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[59]  M. Koper,et al.  The role of bioenergy in a fully sustainable global energy system. , 2012 .

[60]  L. Lardon,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[61]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[62]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[63]  J. Dutoit The Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , 2007 .