Proposal of a green index for small and medium-sized enterprises: A multiple criteria group decision-making approach

Abstract The impact of small and medium-sized enterprises' (SMEs) activities on the environment has proved to be negative in certain contexts, since these companies have not, for the most part, included environmentally sustainable practices in their processes, strategies, or long-term vision. Therefore, SMEs need to start adopting more environmentally-friendly behaviors to ensure a better future for coming generations. SMEs have failed to do this until now – despite making a significant effort – in part because dealing with this issue is a quite subjective process and a variety of aspects need to be considered. The current study sought to address this problem through the integrated application of cognitive mapping and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Based on a constructivist approach, group sessions involving a panel of entrepreneurs and environmental experts created, tested, and validated a green index for SMEs that addresses two of the major limitations of current evaluation approaches. The first limitation is the manner in which evaluation criteria have been defined within the scope of SME environmental conduct assessments, while the second is the method with which these same criteria's weights – or trade-offs – are calculated. The proposed index produced promising results when used to identify the most environmentally-friendly SMEs in a sample of firms. These results can be used as benchmark data for environmental improvement initiatives, and the findings confirm that the methodologies underlying the proposed model-building process facilitate a clearer understanding of how to evaluate SMEs' pro-environmental behaviors. The advantages and limitations of the proposed index are also discussed.

[1]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  A Participatory Approach to Ecosystem Conservation: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Stakeholder Group Analysis in Uluabat Lake, Turkey , 2003, Environmental management.

[2]  Devika Kannan,et al.  Role of multiple stakeholders and the critical success factor theory for the sustainable supplier selection process , 2018 .

[3]  Patrick de Beer,et al.  Environmental accounting: A management tool for enhancing corporate environmental and economic performance , 2006 .

[4]  S. N. Musa,et al.  Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework , 2018, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  João J. M. Ferreira,et al.  Integrating Metacognitive and Psychometric Decision-Making Approaches for Bank Customer Loyalty Measurement , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[7]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  A General Measure of Ecological Behavior1 , 1998 .

[8]  Andrea Trianni,et al.  Barriers to energy efficiency measures and the role of industrial sustainability , 2016 .

[9]  Devika Kannan,et al.  Analyzing sustainable manufacturing practices – A case study in Indian context , 2017 .

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty What is the analytic hierarchy process , 1988 .

[11]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  Understanding the dynamics behind bank branch service quality in Portugal: pursuing a holistic view using fuzzy cognitive mapping , 2016 .

[12]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Evaluating the drivers of corporate social responsibility in the mining industry with multi-criteria approach: A multi-stakeholder perspective , 2014 .

[13]  Philip James,et al.  Fuzzy cognitive mapping to appraise complex situations , 2007 .

[14]  Rosaria de F. S. M. Russo,et al.  Criteria in AHP: A Systematic Review of Literature , 2015, ITQM.

[15]  Beatriz Junquera,et al.  A review of the literature on environmental innovation management in SMEs: implications for public policies , 2003 .

[16]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  Logic and rationality in OR interventions: an examination in the light of the ‘critical rationalist’ approach , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  An investigation on lean-green implementation practices in Indian SMEs using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) approach , 2016 .

[18]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Application of AHP technique , 2009 .

[19]  Biljana Vučićević,et al.  A comparison of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analysis and Synthesis of Parameters under Information Deficiency method for assessing the sustainability of waste management scenarios , 2016 .

[20]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  For sale… but for how long? a methodological proposal for estimating time-on-the-market , 2015 .

[21]  Patrik Thollander,et al.  Industrial energy management decision making for improved energy efficiency-strategic system perspectives and situated action in combination , 2015 .

[22]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Prioritising indicators in improving supply chain performance using fuzzy AHP: insights from the case example of four Indian manufacturing companies , 2017 .

[23]  Andrea Trianni,et al.  Broadening to sustainability the perspective of industrial decision-makers on the energy efficiency measures adoption: some empirical evidence , 2018 .

[24]  F. Testa,et al.  Is an Environmental Management System able to influence environmental and competitive performance? The case of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS) in the European Union , 2009 .

[25]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  Christin-Melanie Vauclair,et al.  Raising awareness of climate change causes? Cross-national evidence for the normalization of societal risk perception of climate change , 2018 .

[27]  Berit Balfors,et al.  Identification of environmental aspects in an EMS context: a methodological framework for the Swedish National Rail Administration , 2007 .

[28]  Karen L. McLeod,et al.  The many faces of ecosystem-based management: Making the process work today in real places , 2010 .

[29]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[30]  Marjan S. Jalali,et al.  Experience-focused thinking and cognitive mapping in ethical banking practices: From practical intuition to theory , 2016 .

[31]  R. Burritt,et al.  Sustainability accounting for companies: Catchphrase or decision support for business leaders? , 2010 .

[32]  Giovanni Longo,et al.  Multi-criteria Analysis to Support Mobility Management at a University Campus☆ , 2015 .

[33]  M. P. Maloney,et al.  Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. , 1973 .

[34]  Manuel Larrán Jorge,et al.  Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: is there a direct link? , 2015 .

[35]  K. Chan,et al.  Structuring decision-making for ecosystem-based management , 2011 .

[36]  T. Saaty An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[37]  Colin Eden,et al.  SODA - journey making and mapping in practice , 2001 .

[38]  Luis G. Vargas An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications , 1990 .

[39]  Noor Hazlina Ahmad,et al.  "DOING WELL BY DOING GOOD" - A STUDY OF ETHICAL AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PRACTICES AMONG ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES IN AN EMERGING ECONOMY , 2009 .

[40]  Fred E. Fiedler,et al.  Engineer the job to fit the manager. , 1965 .

[41]  L. Ensslin,et al.  MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency , 2000 .

[42]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .

[43]  Giovanni Mastroleo,et al.  How can CSR identity be evaluated? A pilot study using a Fuzzy Expert System , 2017 .

[44]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Quantitative life cycle assessment of products 2. Classification, valuation and improvement analysis , 1993 .

[45]  D. Morrow,et al.  Adopting Corporate Environmental Management Systems:: Motivations and Results of ISO 14001 and EMAS Certification , 2002 .

[46]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[47]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool , 1995 .

[48]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Environmental Management System ISO 14001 factors for promoting the adoption of Cleaner Production practices , 2016 .

[49]  A. Calabrese,et al.  A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method to support materiality assessment in sustainability reporting , 2016 .

[50]  Yan Liu,et al.  Design of 'green grade' rating system for the environmental performance assessment of a firm , 2005 .

[51]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[52]  Taciano L. Milfont,et al.  The environmental attitudes inventory: A valid and reliable measure to assess the structure of environmental attitudes , 2010 .

[53]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[54]  P. C. Jha,et al.  Effect of product recovery and sustainability enhancing indicators on the location selection of manufacturing facility , 2016 .

[55]  Lawrence J. Axelrod,et al.  Responding to environmental concerns: What factors guide individual action? , 1993 .

[56]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods , 2014 .

[57]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  Assessing sustainable development in urban areas using cognitive mapping and MCDA , 2018 .

[58]  M. Brunelli Introduction to the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014 .

[59]  Solange Garcia,et al.  Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making , 2016 .

[60]  Andrea Trianni,et al.  Modelling barriers to the adoption of industrial sustainability measures , 2017 .

[61]  Han Shi,et al.  Barriers to the implementation of cleaner production in Chinese SMEs: government, industry and expert stakeholders' perspectives , 2008 .

[62]  Vinicius Picanco Rodrigues,et al.  Process-related key performance indicators for measuring sustainability performance of ecodesign implementation into product development , 2016 .

[63]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[64]  Marjan S. Jalali,et al.  A fuzzy knowledge-based framework for risk assessment of residential real estate investments , 2017 .

[65]  H. Bowen Social Responsibilities of the Businessman , 2013 .

[66]  Martin Weber,et al.  Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making , 1993 .

[67]  Grant Murray,et al.  Measuring what we value: The utility of mixed methods approaches for incorporating values into marine social-ecological system management , 2016 .

[68]  Simon Bell,et al.  Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[69]  Stefan Maas,et al.  Development of a CSR model for practice : connecting five inherent areas of sustainable business , 2014 .

[70]  Vera Ferrón Vílchez,et al.  The dark side of ISO 14001: The symbolic environmental behavior , 2017 .

[71]  C. Parker,et al.  A Review of Interventions to Encourage SMEs to Make Environmental Improvements , 2009 .

[72]  F. Ferreira Are you pleased with your neighborhood? A fuzzy cognitive mapping-based approach for measuring residential neighborhood satisfaction in urban communities , 2016 .

[73]  G. Noci,et al.  Managing "green" product innovation in small firms , 1999 .

[74]  Thomas Zobel,et al.  Characterisation of environmental policy implementation in an EMS context : a multiple-case study in Sweden , 2008 .

[75]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Psychological Restoration in Nature as a Positive Motivation for Ecological Behavior , 2001 .

[76]  Florian G. Kaiser,et al.  Assessing people's general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure , 2000 .