On the Computer-Assisted Reasoning about Rough Sets

The paper presents some of the issues concerning a formal description of rough sets. We require the indiscernibility relation to be a tolerance of the carrier, not an equivalence relation, as in the Pawlak’s classical approach. As a tool for formalization we use the Mizar system, which is equipped with the largest formalized library of mathematical facts. This uniform and computer-checked for correctness framework seems to present a satisfactory level of generality and may be used by other systems as well as it is easily readable for humans.

[1]  Anna Gomolinska,et al.  A Comparative Study of Some Generalized Rough Approximations , 2002, Fundam. Informaticae.

[2]  Edward Bryniarski Formal Conception of Rough Sets , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.

[3]  Jerzy W. Grzymala-Busse,et al.  Rough Sets , 1995, Commun. ACM.

[4]  Adam Grabowski,et al.  Robbins Algebras vs. Boolean Algebras1 , 2004 .

[5]  Jouni Järvinen Approximations and Rough Sets Based on Tolerances , 2000, Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing.

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[7]  Andrzej Skowron,et al.  Tolerance Approximation Spaces , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.

[8]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence , 1994 .

[9]  Wojciech Ziarko,et al.  Variable Precision Rough Set Model , 1993, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[10]  Z. Pawlak,et al.  Rough membership functions , 1994 .

[11]  Volker Sorge,et al.  Agent based mathematical reasoning , 1999, Calculemus.

[12]  Robert E. Kent,et al.  Rough Concept Analysis: A Synthesis of Rough Sets and Formal Concept Analysis , 1996, Fundam. Informaticae.