Development and implementation of an anthropometric protocol to evaluate results of otoplasty

Introduction: Prominence is the most common deformity of the ear, affecting about 5% of the population. Most reports on otoplasty describe subjective evaluations, and do not provide accurate postoperative assessment or a comparison between techniques. We propose the development and implementation of a specific protocol to evaluate results. Method: A prospective evaluation for a period of one year in patients who underwent bilateral otoplasty was performed, using a technique based on modeling of the cartilage with sutures, and helix-to-mastoid distance measurements at standardized points. Results: A total of 23 patients with an average age of 17.8 years underwent surgery. Reoperation was performed in 21.7% of the patients or 10.7% of the ears. Nearly 45% of the correction obtained at the upper point and 35% at the middle and lower points were lost in patients who did not undergo reoperation. Conclusions: The protocol was easily used and allowed objective evaluation of the preoperative deformity and surgical results. This technique produced results considered adequate and comparable to the literature. ■ ABSTRACT

[1]  I. Pitanguy,et al.  Island technique for prominent ears: an update of the Ivo Pitanguy clinic experience. , 2011, Aesthetic surgery journal.

[2]  W. Müller,et al.  Otoplasty using a modified anterior scoring technique: standardized measurements of long-term results. , 2010, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[3]  W. Jaffe,et al.  The benefits of otoplasty for children: further evidence to satisfy the modern NHS. , 2009, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[4]  O. Friedman,et al.  Current trends in otoplasty , 2008, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[5]  R. da Silva Freitas,et al.  Comparing Cephaloauricular and Scaphaconchal Angles in Prominent Ear Patients and Control Subjects , 2008, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[6]  A. Bhatti,et al.  Sutureless otoplasty by scoring of the cartilage: a study in 34 patients. , 2007, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[7]  K. Stewart,et al.  Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty--A study of 203 cases. , 2006, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[8]  F. Missotten,et al.  Otoplasty for prominent ears: personal technique and review of 150 consecutive cases , 2005, European Journal of Plastic Surgery.

[9]  Rod J. Rohrich,et al.  Otoplasty , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[10]  A. Jebreel,et al.  Otoplasty: a review of the surgical techniques , 2005, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[11]  P. Panettiere,et al.  Otoplasty: A Comparison of Techniques for Antihelical Defects Treatment , 2003, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[12]  L. Hollier,et al.  Otoplasty: Evaluation, Technique, and Review , 2003, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[13]  J. Friedland,et al.  Otoplasty: the experience of 100 consecutive patients. , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[14]  H. Foda Otoplasty: A Graduated Approach , 1999, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[15]  D. Furnas Otoplasty: What I Do Now-A 30-Year Perspective , 1999 .

[16]  A. Messner,et al.  Otoplasty. Clinical protocol and long-term results. , 1996, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[17]  P. Adamson,et al.  Otoplasty: Critical review of clinical results , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[18]  K. H. Tan Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. , 1986, British journal of plastic surgery.

[19]  D. Furnas CORRECTION OF PROMINENT EARS BY CONCHA‐MASTOID SUTURES , 1968, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  A. McDowell GOALS IN OTOPLASTY FOR PROTRUDING EARS , 1968, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  C. Horton,et al.  The growth pattern of the external ear. , 1965, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  S. Stenstroem A “NATURAL” TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS , 1963, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  J. Mustardé The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. , 1963, British journal of plastic surgery.

[24]  D. Stott,et al.  A morphometric study of the human ear. , 2011, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[25]  Bo Wang,et al.  Computed tomography measurement of the auricle in Han population of north China. , 2011, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[26]  M. Kon,et al.  Complications of otoplasty: a literature review. , 2009, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[27]  D. Mahler The correction of the prominent ear , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[28]  I. Pitanguy,et al.  The treatment of prominent ears: A 25-year survey of the island technique , 2005, Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

[29]  B. O. Rogers The classic reprint. A New Operation for Prominent Ears Based on the Anatomy of the Deformity by William H. Luckett, M.D. (reprinted from Surg. Gynec. & Obst., 10: 635-7, 1910). , 1969, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[30]  V. Chongchet A METHOD OF ANTIHELIX RECONSTRUCTION. , 1963, British journal of plastic surgery.