Competition effects in an afrotemperate forest

BackgroundInformation about competition responses is mainly available for monospecific stands or mixed stands with a small number of species. Studies on complex multi-species and highly structured forest ecosystems are scarce. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to quantify competition effects and analyse competition responses in a species-diverse afrotemperate forest in South Africa, based on an observational study with mapped tree positions and long-term diameter increment records.MethodsThe sensitivity to competition was analysed for individual species and involved the calculation of the slope of the linear relation between the value of a competition index (CI) and diameter growth as a measure of sensitivity. In a next step different competition indices were combined and tree diameters were grouped in three classes as surrogates for canopy status and ontogenetic stage.ResultsFive competition indices were found to be effective in showing sensitivity to competition for a number of canopy and sub-canopy species. Significant linear regressions were fitted for 18 of a total of 25 species. Species reactions varied significantly in their sensitivity to the different CIs. The indices were classified as belonging to two groups, those that responded more to local crowding and those that are more sensitive to overtopping, which revealed species-specific sensitivities to both factors. The analysis based on diameter classes revealed that species clearly changed their sensitivity to crowding or overtopping depending on diameter. Canopy and sub-canopy species showed distinct differences in their reactions.ConclusionsThe application of multiple CIs brought novel insights relating to the dynamics of afrotemperate forests. The response patterns to different competition indices that focus on crowding and overtopping are varied and tree diameter dependent, indicating that oversimplified assumptions are not warranted in the interpretation of CI- growth relations.

[1]  Zhili Feng,et al.  Evaluation of competition and light estimation indices for predicting diameter growth in mature boreal mixed forests , 2007, Annals of Forest Science.

[2]  J. Cahill.  Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species , 2002 .

[3]  T. Curt,et al.  Root biomass and rooting profile of naturally regenerated beech in mid-elevation Scots pine woodlands , 2003, Plant Ecology.

[4]  S. Boyden,et al.  COMPETITION AND FACILITATION BETWEEN EUCALYPTUS AND NITROGEN-FIXING FALCATARIA IN RELATION TO SOIL FERTILITY , 2005 .

[5]  J. V. Daalen.  The Value of Crown Position and Form as Growth Indicators in Mixed Evergreen Forest , 1993 .

[6]  Robin Sibson,et al.  Computing Dirichlet Tessellations in the Plane , 1978, Comput. J..

[7]  J. Vanclay,et al.  The balance between facilitation and competition in mixtures of Eucalyptus and Acacia changes as stands develop , 2011, Oecologia.

[8]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Forest growth modelling and prediction , 1988 .

[9]  C. Canham,et al.  Measurement and modeling of spatially explicit variation in light transmission through interior cedar-hemlock forests of British Columbia , 1999 .

[10]  D. Burslem,et al.  Release from root competition promotes tree seedling survival and growth following transplantation into human-induced grasslands in Sri Lanka , 2011 .

[11]  G. Kraft.  Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben , 1884 .

[12]  J. Bauhus,et al.  Aboveground and belowground interactions in mixed plantations of Eucalyptus globulus and Acacia mearnsii , 2000 .

[13]  Philip E. Hulme,et al.  HERBIVORY, PLANT REGENERATION, AND SPECIES COEXISTENCE , 1996 .

[14]  D. T. Lee,et al.  Two-Dimensional Voronoi Diagrams in the Lp-Metric , 1980, J. ACM.

[15]  A. Bolte,et al.  Relationships between tree dimension and coarse root biomass in mixed stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies[L.] Karst.) , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[16]  Forest structure in selected South African forests: edaphoclimatic environment, phase and disturbance , 2012, European Journal of Forest Research.

[17]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Effects of Stress and Defence Allocation on Tree Growth: Simulation Results at the Individual and Stand Level , 2012 .

[18]  J. Jarvis,et al.  A Preliminary Study to Assess Competition in a White Spruce - Trembling Aspen Stand , 1963 .

[19]  K. Gadow,et al.  DBH growth model for Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis mixed forests in central Korea , 2004 .

[20]  T. Seifert.  Integration von Holzqualität und Holzsortierung in behandlungssensitive Waldwachstumsmodelle , 2003 .

[21]  Ü. Niinemets,et al.  Shade Tolerance, a Key Plant Feature of Complex Nature and Consequences , 2008 .

[22]  J. Louw,et al.  Spatiotemporally interactive growth dynamics in selected South African forests: Edaphoclimatic environment, crowding and climate effects , 2011 .

[23]  T. Seifert,et al.  Resin pocket occurrence in Norway spruce depending on tree and climate variables , 2010 .

[24]  J. Krajícek,et al.  Crown competition-a measure of density. , 1961 .

[25]  L MartinG,et al.  レジノーザマツ(Pinus resinosa)人工林の直径及び樹高生長予測のための競争の測定及び生長モデルの比較 , 1984 .

[26]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  PLANT COMPETITION UNDERGROUND , 1997 .

[27]  Ben Bond-Lamberty,et al.  Aboveground and belowground biomass and sapwood area allometric equations for six boreal tree species of northern Manitoba , 2002 .

[28]  T. Seifert,et al.  Analysis of long-term dynamics of crowns of sessile oaks at the stand level by means of spatial statistics , 2008 .

[29]  B. Courbaud.  Modélisation de la croissance en forêt irrégulière. Perspectives pour les pessières irrégulières de montagne , 1995 .

[30]  Paul A. Ferry,et al.  Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land , 2010, Biology Letters.

[31]  Nick M. Haddad,et al.  CORRIDOR USE BY DIVERSE TAXA , 2003 .

[32]  Lianhai Wu,et al.  Biomass structure and allometry of Abies nephrolepis (Maxim) in Northeast China , 2011 .

[33]  D. Pothier,et al.  Predicting basal area increment in a spatially explicit, individual tree model: a test of competition measures with black spruce , 2003 .

[34]  A. R. Ek,et al.  A Comparison of Competition Measures and Growth Models for Predicting Plantation Red Pine Diameter and Height Growth , 1984 .

[35]  Simone Campanoni.  Competition , 1866, Nature.

[36]  T. Pukkala.  Prediction of tree diameter and height in a Scots pine stand as a function of the spatial pattern of trees. , 1989 .

[37]  H. Ouyang,et al.  Seasonal patterns of root and shoot interactions in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau , 2012 .

[38]  J. Cahill.  Fertilization effects on interactions between above-and belowground competition in an old field , 1999 .

[39]  M. Begon,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities , 1986 .

[40]  F. Houllier,et al.  Ecological meaning and predictive ability of social status, vigour and competition indices in a tropical rain forest (India) , 1999 .

[41]  A. Menzel,et al.  Solar Radiation as a Driver for Growth and Competition in Forest Stands , 2012 .

[42]  F. White.  The Afromontane Region , 1978 .

[43]  L. Aarssen.  Competitive ability and species coexistence: a 'plant's-eye' view , 1989 .

[44]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model , 2009 .

[45]  J. Bauhus,et al.  The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[46]  Rainer Matyseek.  Growth and defence in plants : resource allocation at multiple scales , 2012 .

[47]  Climate effects on productivity and resource-use efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in stands with different spatial mixing patterns , 2012, Trees.

[48]  E. Nikinmaa,et al.  Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth, biomass allocation, and crown morphology of understory sugar maple, yellow birch, and beech , 2000 .

[49]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure , 2006 .

[50]  H. Pretzsch.  Forest Dynamics, Growth, and Yield , 2010 .

[51]  Laura A. Hyatt,et al.  Above-ground competition does not alter biomass allocated to roots in Abutilon theophrasti. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[52]  T. Seifert,et al.  Effects of irregular stand structure on tree growth, crown extension and branchiness of plantation-grown Pinus patula , 2013 .

[53]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  User's guide to the stand prognosis model / , 1982 .

[54]  D. Binkley,et al.  Nutritional interactions in mixed species forests: a synthesis , 2001 .

[55]  D. Forrester.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests: From pattern to process , 2014 .

[56]  Craig G. Lorimer,et al.  Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands , 1983 .

[57]  Aged Forests.  PERFECTING A STAND-DENSITY INDEX FOR EVEN- , 2010 .

[58]  L. Aarssen.  Ecological Combining Ability and Competitive Combining Ability in Plants: Toward a General Evolutionary Theory of Coexistence in Systems of Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[59]  K. Gadow,et al.  Iterative bestimmung der konkurrenzbäume in Pinus densiflora beständen , 1997 .

[60]  C. Canham,et al.  Effects of suppression and release on sapling growth for 11 tree species of northern, interior British Columbia , 2000 .

[61]  T. Seifert,et al.  Towards an individual tree forest growth model for natural forests in South Africa: Testing competition indices to model individual tree diameter growth in Afro-temperate forests , 2011 .

[62]  G. Gauze.  The struggle for existence, by G. F. Gause. , 1934 .

[63]  L. Mucina,et al.  Afrotemperate, Subtropical and Azonal Forests , 2006 .

[64]  M. Begon,et al.  Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities , 1986 .

[65]  Yu Dai,et al.  [Effects and influence factors of dicyandiamide (DCD) application in agricultural ecosystem]. , 1988, Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology.

[66]  D. Coomes,et al.  Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth , 2007 .

[67]  E. Assmann.  Waldertragskunde : organische Produktion, Struktur, Zuwachs und Ertrag von Waldbeständen , 1961 .

[68]  C. Canham,et al.  Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species , 2009 .

[69]  M. C. Rutherford,et al.  The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. , 2006 .

[70]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[71]  Matthias Dobbertin,et al.  A Comparison of Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Height and Basal Area Growth of Individual Conifer Trees , 1992, Forest Science.

[72]  Klaus Von Gadow,et al.  Modelling Forest Development , 1998, Forestry Sciences.

[73]  H. L. Allen,et al.  Leaf Area, Stemwood Growth, and Nutrition Relationships in Loblolly Pine , 1988, Forest Science.

[74]  K. Gadow.  Modelling growth in managed forests — realism and limits of lumping , 1996 .

[75]  G. F. Gause,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF VITO VOLTERRA'S MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE. , 1934, Science.