How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning.

The link between the built environment and human behavior has long been of interest to the field of urban planning, but direct assessments of the links between the built environment and physical activity as it influences personal health are still rare in the field. Yet the concepts, theories, and methods used by urban planners provide a foundation for an emerging body of research on the relationship between the built environment and physical activity. Recent research efforts in urban planning have focused on the idea that land use and design policies can be used to increase transit use as well as walking and bicycling. The development of appropriate measures for the built environment and for travel behavior is an essential element of this research. The link between the built environment and travel behavior is then made using theoretical frameworks borrowed from economics, and in particular, the concept of travel as a derived demand. The available evidence lends itself to the argument that a combination of urban design, land use patterns, and transportation systems that promotes walking and bicycling will help create active, healthier, and more livable communities. To provide more conclusive evidence, however, researchers must address the following issues: An alternative to the derived-demand framework must be developed for walking, measures of the built environment must be refined, and more-complete data on walking must be developed. In addition, detailed data on the built environment must be spatially matched to detailed data on travel behavior.

[1]  S. Handy Understanding the Link Between Urban Form and Nonwork Travel Behavior , 1995 .

[2]  L. Frank,et al.  Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, and Walking , 1994 .

[3]  Michael G. McNally,et al.  COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS FOR NEOTRADITIONAL DESIGNS , 1993 .

[4]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Land Use, Urban Design, and Nonwork Travel: Reproducing Other Urban Areas’ Empirical Test Results in Portland, Oregon , 2000 .

[5]  S. Glaister Urban travel demand : Thomas A. Domencich and Daniel McFadden, (North-Holland Amsterdam, 1975) pp. xvi + 216, $23.25. , 1977 .

[6]  Max Jacobson,et al.  A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction , 1981 .

[7]  R. Crane,et al.  DOES NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN INFLUENCE TRAVEL?: A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL DIARY AND GIS DATA , 1998 .

[8]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Assessment of Influence of Land Use–Transportation System on Travel Behavior , 1997 .

[9]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Built Environment as Determinant of Walking Behavior: Analyzing Nonwork Pedestrian Travel in Portland, Oregon , 2001 .

[10]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis , 2001 .

[11]  Deborah A Dagang TRANSPORTATION-RELATED LAND USE STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS: AN INDIRECT SOURCE RESEARCH STUDY: FINAL REPORT. , 1995 .

[12]  Mark D. Uncles,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1987 .

[13]  D. Kelbaugh The New Urbanism , 1997 .

[14]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Evaluating neighborhood accessibility: possibilities and practicalities , 2001 .

[15]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Regional Versus Local Accessibility: Implications for Nonwork Travel , 1993 .

[16]  A. Duany Towns and town-making principles , 1991 .

[17]  Kelly J. Clifton,et al.  Local shopping as a strategy for reducing automobile travel , 2001 .

[18]  Susan L Handy,et al.  METHODOLOGIES FOR EXPLORING THE LINK BETWEEN URBAN FORM AND TRAVEL BEHAVIOR , 1996 .

[19]  P. Katz The New Urbanism: Toward an Architecture of Community , 1993 .

[20]  R. Mitchell,et al.  URBAN TRAFFIC--A FUNCTION OF LAND USE , 1954 .

[21]  Orlando Strambi,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS , 1994 .

[22]  R. Cervero,et al.  COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS , 1995 .

[23]  Charles A. Johnson,et al.  NEO-TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOODS: A SOLUTION TO TRAFFIC CONGESTION?. , 1992 .

[24]  Steven R. Strom GREAT STREETS , 1997, Landscape Journal.

[25]  Patrlcla,et al.  How derived is the demand for travel ? Some conceptual and measurement considerations , 2004 .

[26]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  ACCESSIBILITY MEASURES FORMULATION CONSIDERATIONS AND CURRENT APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[27]  M. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete choice analysis , 1989 .

[28]  P. Calthorpe The Next American Metropolis: Ecology, Community, and the American Dream , 1993 .

[29]  K. Train Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics, and an Application to Automobile Demand , 1985 .

[30]  J. Jacobs The Death and Life of Great American Cities , 1962 .

[31]  J. M. Thomson,et al.  Great cities and their traffic , 1977 .

[32]  D. McFadden,et al.  URBAN TRAVEL DEMAND - A BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[33]  R. Cervero,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND AND THE 3DS: DENSITY, DIVERSITY, AND DESIGN , 1997 .

[34]  W. Whyte The social life of small urban spaces , 1980 .

[35]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[36]  M. Boarnet,et al.  Can Land Use Policy Really Affect Travel Behavior? A Study of the Link between Non-Work Travel and Land Use Characteristics , 1996 .

[37]  P. Hess Measures of Connectivity , 1997 .

[38]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Land Use, Urban Design, and Non-Work Travel: Reproducing for Portland, Oregon, Empirical Tests from other Urban Areas , 1999 .

[39]  R. Kitamura,et al.  A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area , 1997 .

[40]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  Travel by design : the influence of urban form on travel , 2001 .

[41]  K. Lynch Good city form , 1984 .

[42]  Marlon G. Boarnet Travel by design , 2001 .

[43]  Ronaldo Balassiano,et al.  The transit metropolis: a global inquiry , 2001 .

[44]  Murray Silverstein,et al.  A Pattern Language , 1977 .