Resource portfolio design considerations for materially-efficient planning of 100% renewable electricity systems

Different configurations of a 100% renewable electricity system are possible, but not all are equally desirable in terms of the scale of material resources required to sustain them. This study compares different approaches for developing a 100% renewable electricity system on the basis of the material mass investment required to sustain their physical components. Electric grid modeling accounting for operational constraints is used to determine the scale of energy technology capacities required to achieve a 100% renewable electricity system using California as a representative example and translating those requirements to material mass requirements. Using a wind/solar/storage approach requires exponentially growing capacities of energy storage to meet operational needs and requires significant material mass investments. Material resource efficiency of the system is shown to be improved by maximizing the use of regional non-variable renewables to the extent possible within local capacity constraints. Alternatively, overbuilding the wind and solar capacity in excess of that needed to meet annual demand is also shown to improve material resource efficiency of the system. Overall, different approaches for meeting a 100% renewable electricity penetration are not equally desirable when material resource usage is considered. This should be taken into account in future energy system planning studies.

[1]  Paul Denholm,et al.  How low can you go? The importance of quantifying minimum generation levels for renewable integration , 2018 .

[2]  Colin F. Williams,et al.  Assessment of Moderate- and High-Temperature Geothermal Resources of the United States , 2008 .

[3]  Scott Samuelsen,et al.  The importance of grid integration for achievable greenhouse gas emissions reductions from alternative vehicle technologies , 2015 .

[4]  Li Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of charging infrastructure requirements and operating costs for plug-in electric vehicles , 2013 .

[5]  Scott Samuelsen,et al.  Evaluating options for balancing the water-electricity nexus in California: Part 2--greenhouse gas and renewable energy utilization impacts. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Nadia Maïzi,et al.  Feasible path toward 40–100% renewable energy shares for power supply in France by 2050: A prospective analysis , 2016 .

[7]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Smart Energy Europe: The technical and economic impact of one potential 100% renewable energy scenario for the European Union , 2016 .

[8]  S. Pacca,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from building and operating electric power plants in the Upper Colorado River Basin. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[9]  Gm. Shafiullah,et al.  Mitigation strategies to minimize potential technical challenges of renewable energy integration , 2018 .

[10]  Joana Portugal-Pereira,et al.  Post-disaster resilience of a 100% renewable energy system in Japan , 2014 .

[11]  Bin Lu,et al.  100% renewable electricity in Australia , 2017 .

[12]  G. Papaefthymiou,et al.  Towards 100% renewable energy systems: Uncapping power system flexibility , 2016 .

[13]  Robert Wetherill Bialobrzeski,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF A SEGS SOLAR FIELD FOR COST EFFECTIVE POWER OUTPUT , 2007 .

[14]  C. Bradshaw,et al.  Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems , 2017 .

[15]  Jeongwoo Han,et al.  Life-cycle analysis results of geothermal systems in comparison to other power systems. , 2010 .

[16]  Li Zhang,et al.  Charging a renewable future: The impact of electric vehicle charging intelligence on energy storage requirements to meet renewable portfolio standards , 2016 .

[17]  Fabian Mueller,et al.  Exploration of the integration of renewable resources into California's electric system using the Holistic Grid Resource Integration and Deployment (HiGRID) tool , 2013 .

[18]  Li Zhang,et al.  Assessing the stationary energy storage equivalency of vehicle-to-grid charging battery electric vehicles , 2016 .

[19]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Smart Energy Systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions , 2015 .

[20]  Scott Samuelsen,et al.  Quantifying climate change impacts on hydropower generation and implications on electric grid greenhouse gas emissions and operation , 2016 .

[21]  M. A. Cameron,et al.  Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Jacob DeAngelo,et al.  Mapping Geothermal Potential in the Western United states , 2008 .

[23]  Amory B. Lovins,et al.  Reliably integrating variable renewables: Moving grid flexibility resources from models to results , 2017 .

[24]  Joshua David Eichman.  Energy Management Challenges and Opportunities with Increased Intermittent Renewable Generation on the California Electrical Grid , 2013 .

[25]  Li Zhang,et al.  Fuel reduction and electricity consumption impact of different charging scenarios for plug-in hybrid , 2011 .

[26]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors , 2013 .

[27]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Cost-minimized combinations of wind power, solar power and electrochemical storage, powering the grid up to 99.9% of the time , 2013 .

[28]  Marshall J. Reed,et al.  Quantifying the Undiscovered Geothermal Resources of the United States , 2009 .

[29]  Christian Breyer,et al.  The Role of Energy Storage Solutions in a 100% Renewable Finnish Energy System , 2016 .

[30]  Samiha Tahseen,et al.  Deploying storage assets to facilitate variable renewable energy integration: The impacts of grid flexibility, renewable penetration, and market structure , 2018 .

[31]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Features of a fully renewable US electricity system: Optimized mixes of wind and solar PV and transmission grid extensions , 2014, 1402.2833.