Effects of carbidopa premedication on 18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: a static, dynamic and radiomics analysis

Purpose This study aims to determine the impact of carbidopa premedication on static, dynamic and radiomics parameters of 18F-FDOPA PET imaging in brain tumors. Material and Methods The study included 54 patients that underwent 18F-FDOPA PET imaging for newly diagnosed gliomas. Among these, 18 patients received 100 mg of carbidopa. SUV parameters and 105 radiomics features were extracted from the static images. Dynamic data were available for 41 patients. Time to Peak (TTP) values were extracted from dynamic acquisitions. These parameters were obtained from volumes of interest in healthy brain as well as tumors. Simulation of the effects of carbidopa premedication on TTP values were also generated. Results All static and TTP dynamic parameters were significantly increased in healthy brain regions of premedicated patients (ΔSUVmean = + 53%, ΔTTP = + 48%, p < 0.001). Furthermore, carbidopa impacted 81% of radiomics features, of which 92% correlated with SUVmean (absolute correlation coefficient ≥ 0.4). In tumors, premedication with carbidopa was an independent predictor of SUVmean (ΔSUVmean = + 52%, p < 0.001) and TTP (ΔTTP = + 24%, p = 0.025). Interestingly, all parameters were no longer significantly modified by carbidopa premedication when using tumor-to-healthy-brain image and TAC ratios. Simulated data confirmed that carbidopa leads to an increase in tumor TTP values which is corrected by using these ratios. Conclusion In 18F-FDOPA PET brain imaging, carbidopa induces an increase of similar magnitude in SUV, SUV-dependent radiomics and TTP dynamic parameters in healthy brain and tumor regions which are compensated for after using the tumor-to-healthy-brain image and TAC ratios which is an important point for multicentric studies harmonization.

[1]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  18F-FDOPA PET for the Noninvasive Prediction of Glioma Molecular Parameters: A Radiomics Study , 2022, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  R. Boellaard,et al.  EANM practice guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for dopaminergic imaging in Parkinsonian syndromes 1.0 , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Luc Taillandier,et al.  Joint SFMN/ANOCEF focus on 18F-FDOPA PET imaging in glioma: Current applications and perspectives , 2020 .

[4]  Marie Blonski,et al.  Integration of dynamic parameters in the analysis of 18F-FDopa PET imaging improves the prediction of molecular features of gliomas , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  Jochen Herms,et al.  Non-invasive prediction of IDH-wildtype genotype in gliomas using dynamic 18F-FET PET , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[6]  G. Minniti,et al.  The mean striatal 18F-DOPA uptake is not a reliable cut-off threshold for biological tumour volume definition of glioma , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  Ian Law,et al.  Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0 , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Irène Buvat,et al.  LIFEx: A Freeware for Radiomic Feature Calculation in Multimodality Imaging to Accelerate Advances in the Characterization of Tumor Heterogeneity. , 2018, Cancer research.

[9]  Gereon R Fink,et al.  Static and dynamic 18F–FET PET for the characterization of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  N. Albert,et al.  Towards standardization of 18F-FET PET imaging: do we need a consistent method of background activity assessment? , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[11]  Ian Law,et al.  Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[12]  Jacques Darcourt,et al.  Study of LAT1 Expression in Brain Metastases: Towards a Better Understanding of the Results of Positron Emission Tomography Using Amino Acid Tracers , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[14]  [World Health Organization classification of tumours of the central nervous system: a summary]. , 2016, Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology.

[15]  Marie Blonski,et al.  Correlation of SUV-Derived Indices With Tumoral Aggressiveness of Gliomas in Static 18F-FDOPA PET: Use in Clinical Practice , 2015, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[16]  Lutz Tellmann,et al.  Dual-time-point O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for grading of cerebral gliomas , 2015, European Radiology.

[17]  Sung-Cheng Huang,et al.  Automated Movement Correction for Dynamic PET/CT Images: Evaluation with Phantom and Patient Data , 2014, PloS one.

[18]  M. Nagane,et al.  Enhanced tumor growth elicited by L-type amino acid transporter 1 in human malignant glioma cells. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[19]  Wei Chen,et al.  18F-FDOPA Kinetics in Brain Tumors , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Wei Chen,et al.  18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  K Wienhard,et al.  F-Dopa as an amino acid tracer to detect brain tumors. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Kinetics and Modeling of l-6-[18F]Fluoro-DOPA in Human Positron Emission Tomographic Studies , 1991, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.