Sparse encoding of automatic visual association in hippocampal networks

Intelligent action entails exploiting predictions about associations between elements of ones environment. The hippocampus and mediotemporal cortex are endowed with the network topology, physiology, and neurochemistry to automatically and sparsely code sensori-cognitive associations that can be reconstructed from single or partial inputs. Whilst acquiring fMRI data and performing an attentional task, participants were incidentally presented with a sequence of cartoon images. By assigning subjects a post-scan free-association task on the same images we assayed the density of associations triggered by these stimuli. Using multivariate Bayesian decoding, we show that human hippocampal and temporal neocortical structures host sparse associative representations that are automatically triggered by visual input. Furthermore, as predicted theoretically, there was a significant increase in sparsity in the Cornu Ammonis subfields, relative to the entorhinal cortex. Remarkably, the sparsity of CA encoding correlated significantly with associative memory performance over subjects; elsewhere within the temporal lobe, entorhinal, parahippocampal, perirhinal and fusiform cortices showed the highest model evidence for the sparse encoding of associative density. In the absence of reportability or attentional confounds, this charts a distribution of visual associative representations within hippocampal populations and their temporal lobe afferent fields, and demonstrates the viability of retrospective associative sampling techniques for assessing the form of reflexive associative encoding.

[1]  E T Rolls,et al.  Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network , 1992, Hippocampus.

[2]  Jiali Yu,et al.  Synaptic conditions for auto-associative memory storage and pattern completion in Jensen et al.’s model of hippocampal area CA3 , 2012, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  K. Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[4]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  W. Kirchner Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  T. Bliss,et al.  Synaptic plasticity, memory and the hippocampus: a neural network approach to causality , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Decoding episodic memory in ageing: A Bayesian analysis of activity patterns predicting memory , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The left medial temporal region and schizophrenia. A PET study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterizing Dynamic Brain Responses with fMRI: A Multivariate Approach , 1995, NeuroImage.

[10]  Masato Okada,et al.  Notions of Associative Memory and Sparse Coding , 1996, Neural Networks.

[11]  Mattias P. Karlsson,et al.  Network Dynamics Underlying the Formation of Sparse, Informative Representations in the Hippocampus , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Alison L. Barth,et al.  Experimental evidence for sparse firing in the neocortex , 2012, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Jan Voogd,et al.  The human central nervous system : a synopsis and atlas , 1978 .

[14]  Simon M Stringer,et al.  Entorhinal cortex grid cells can map to hippocampal place cells by competitive learning , 2006, Network.

[15]  R. Likert “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Classical and Bayesian Inference in Neuroimaging: Theory , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  Eleanor A Maguire,et al.  Representations of recent and remote autobiographical memories in hippocampal subfields , 2013, Hippocampus.

[18]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[19]  K. Henke A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  W. Schwerdtfeger Direct efferent and afferent connections of the hippocampus with the neocortex in the marmoset monkey. , 1979, The American journal of anatomy.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Entropy and cortical activity: information theory and PET findings. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian decoding of brain images , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[24]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Hippocampal Contributions to Control: The Third Way , 2007, NIPS.

[25]  E. Rolls,et al.  Neural networks and brain function , 1998 .

[26]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[27]  C. Price,et al.  Perirhinal Contributions to Human Visual Perception , 2007, Current Biology.

[28]  D L Rosene,et al.  Organization of direct hippocampal efferent projections to the cerebral cortex of the rhesus monkey: Projections from CA1, prosubiculum, and subiculum to the temporal lobe , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis in human hippocampal subfields , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..