Sociocultural context of individual creativity: a transhistorical time-series analysis.

Hypotheses were stated which specify individual creativity as a function of developmental and productive period variables. It was then argued that these hypotheses could be better tested by examining generational fluctuations in creativity. Information from cultural and political archival sources was thus aggregated to form time series spanning 127 generations of European history. Data quality checks, control variables, data transformations, time-lagged comparisons, and trend analyses were used to improve the validity of the causal inferences. While the results varied according to the type of creativity (discursive or presentational) and the degree of achieved eminence, creative development was found to be affected by the following: (a) role model availability, (b) political fragmentation, (c) imperial instability, and (d) political instability.

[1]  F A Haddon,et al.  Teaching approach and the development of divergent thinking abilities in primary schools. , 1968, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  W. Dennis,et al.  Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. , 1966, Journal of gerontology.

[3]  K. Gergen.  Social Psychology as History , 1973 .

[4]  T. Shibutani,et al.  Reference Groups as Perspectives , 1955, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  D. W. Mackinnon,et al.  The nature and nurture of creative talent. , 1962 .

[6]  H. G. Barnett,et al.  Innovation: The Basis of Cultural Change , 1963 .

[7]  L. Kohlberg.  Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization , 1969 .

[8]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Causal Inferences, Closed Populations, and Measures of Association , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[9]  G. L. Freeman.  The relationship between performance level and bodily activity level. , 1940 .

[10]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[11]  F. Bartlett.  Thinking: An Experimental and Social Study , 1958 .

[12]  Bernard Norling,et al.  Timeless problems in history , 1970 .

[13]  H. Barnes.  An intellectual and cultural history of the Western world , 1938 .

[14]  F. Barron,et al.  The disposition toward originality. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[15]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Causal Models in the Social Sciences. , 1972 .

[16]  F. M. Andrews,et al.  Detecting Causal Priorities in Panel Study Data , 1964 .

[17]  Douglas A. Hibbs,et al.  Problems of Statistical Estimation and Causal Inference in Time-Series Regression Models , 1973 .

[18]  B. Collins,et al.  Four components of the Rotter Internal-External scale: belief in a difficult world, a just world, a pedictable world, and a politically responsive world. , 1974, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[20]  Catharine Morris Cox,et al.  The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses , 1926 .

[21]  J. W. Getzels,et al.  Creativity and Intelligence , 1962 .

[22]  Pitirim A. Sorokin,et al.  Social and Cultural Dynamics , 1958 .

[23]  Robert C. Davis,et al.  The Achieving Society , 1962 .

[24]  D. Campbell,et al.  More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique. , 1969 .

[25]  H. Lehman,et al.  Age and Achievement , 1953 .

[26]  D. Simonton.  Age and Literary Creativity , 1975 .

[27]  Jan Kmenta,et al.  Elements of econometrics , 1988 .

[28]  D. Simonton.  Interdisciplinary creativity over historical time: a correlational analysis of generational fluctuations , 1975 .

[29]  J. Johnston,et al.  Econometric Methods, 2nd Ed. , 1976 .

[30]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[31]  Calvin W. Taylor,et al.  Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. , 1963 .

[32]  M. Wallach,et al.  A new look at the creativity-intelligence distinction. , 1965, Journal of personality.

[33]  David G. Winter,et al.  Measuring the motives of public officials at a distance: An exploratory study of american presidents , 1970 .

[34]  W. Mcguire.  The Yin and Yang of Progress in Social Psychology: Seven Koan. , 1973 .

[35]  Raoul Naroll,et al.  Creativity: A Cross-Historical Pilot Survey , 1971 .

[36]  DeWitt H. Parker,et al.  Philosophy in a New Key , 1941 .

[37]  B. R. Schlenker.  Social psychology and science. , 1974 .

[38]  S. Mednick.  The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[39]  Goslin,et al.  Handbook of socialization theory and research , 1969 .

[40]  C. E. Gray.  An Analysis of Graeco‐Roman Development , 1958 .

[41]  J. Gasset.,et al.  Man and Crisis , 1959 .

[42]  Charles Edward Gray,et al.  A Measurement of Creativity in Western Civilization , 1966 .

[43]  Herbert L. Costner,et al.  Sociological methodology, 1973-1974 , 1974 .

[44]  A. Anastasi,et al.  A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent bys. , 1968, The Journal of applied psychology.

[45]  R. Decharms,et al.  Values expressed in American children's readers: 1800-1950. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[46]  H. Simon,et al.  Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation* , 1954 .

[47]  Pitirim A. Sorokin,et al.  Social and Cultural Dynamics , 1938 .

[48]  A. Koestler.  The Act of Creation , 1964 .

[49]  H. Blalock.  Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research , 1966 .

[50]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  Guiding creative talent , 1962 .

[51]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[52]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[53]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .