The influence of temporal factors on automatic priming and conscious expectancy in a simple reaction time task.

In a previous study, we reported a dissociation between subjective expectancy and motor behaviour in a simple associative learning task (Perruchet, Cleeremans, & Destrebecqz, 2006). According to previous conditioning studies (Clark, Manns, & Squire, 2001), this dissociation is observed when the to-be-associated events coterminate and thus overlap in time (a training regimen called delay conditioning), but not when they are separated by a temporal delay (trace conditioning). In this latter situation indeed, there tends to be a direct relationship between subjective expectancy and behaviour. In this study, we further investigated this issue in a series of experiments where conscious and unconscious components of performance were pitted against each other. In Experiments 1–3, participants performed a simple reaction time task in which a preparatory signal (a tone) either overlapped with or terminated earlier than the imperative stimulus (a visual target presented in 50% of the trials). After each response, participants also had to state how much they expected the imperative stimulus to be displayed on the next trial. Results indicate that reaction times tend to decrease when the tone is consistently followed by the visual target across successive trials, whereas conscious expectancy for the target decreases at the same time. Importantly, we systematically found that the temporal relationship between the tone and the target failed to influence performance. In a fourth experiment, we examined whether these results extend to a two-choice reaction time task. To our surprise, we observed a direct relationship between subjective expectancies and reaction time in that situation. We nevertheless observed that the introduction of a delay between the tone and the target had, once again, no effect on performance.

[1]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  H. T. Nguyen,et al.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  The neural correlates of implicit and explicit sequence learning: Interacting networks revealed by the process dissociation procedure. , 2005, Learning & memory.

[4]  Bruce D Burns,et al.  Randomness and inductions from streaks: “Gambler’s fallacy” versus ”hot hand“ , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[5]  Fred J Helmstetter,et al.  Neural Substrates Mediating Human Delay and Trace Fear Conditioning , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  What Can we Infer from Double Dissociations? , 2003, Cortex.

[7]  H. T. Nguyen,et al.  Expression of conditional fear with and without awareness , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Christof Koch,et al.  Trace but not delay fear conditioning requires attention and the anterior cingulate cortex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Medial Temporal Lobe Relates to Learning and Awareness , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  C. Koch,et al.  Working memory and fear conditioning , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Appetitive and Aversive Olfactory Learning in Humans Studied Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  H. Critchley,et al.  Fear Conditioning in Humans The Influence of Awareness and Autonomic Arousal on Functional Neuroanatomy , 2002, Neuron.

[14]  Joseph E LeDoux,et al.  Parallels between cerebellum- and amygdala-dependent conditioning , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Joseph R. Manns,et al.  Trace and Delay Eyeblink Conditioning: Contrasting Phenomena of Declarative and Nondeclarative Memory , 2001, Psychological science.

[16]  D. Willingham,et al.  The Relation Between Implicit and Explicit Learning: Evidence for Parallel Development , 1999 .

[17]  Z. Dienes,et al.  A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  M. N. Rajah,et al.  Interactions of prefrontal cortex in relation to awareness in sensory learning. , 1999, Science.

[19]  R. Clark,et al.  Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. , 1998, Science.

[20]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Cognition Unawares. (Book Reviews: Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious.) , 1996 .

[21]  David R. Shanks,et al.  The Psychology of Associative Learning , 1995 .

[22]  L. Squire,et al.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[23]  G. Keren,et al.  The Two Fallacies of Gamblers: Type I and Type II , 1994 .

[24]  D. Shanks,et al.  Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  P. Perruchet A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning , 1985, The Pavlovian journal of biological science.

[26]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[27]  R. Bolles Reinforcement, expectancy, and learning. , 1972 .

[28]  R. Rescorla Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. , 1968, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[29]  Brown Wl,et al.  Recency, frequency, and probability in response prediction. , 1957 .

[30]  P. Lovibond,et al.  Is Perruchet's dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems? , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[31]  D. Shanks,et al.  The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: empirical evidence and theoretical implications. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[32]  David R. Shanks,et al.  A critical examination of the evidence for unconscious (implicit) learning , 1994 .

[33]  K. Kirsner,et al.  Discovering functionally independent mental processes: the principle of reversed association. , 1988, Psychological review.

[34]  S. Tipper,et al.  Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology , 1948, Nature.