Parameter identifiability of power-law biochemical system models.

Mathematical modeling has become an integral component in biotechnology, in which these models are frequently used to design and optimize bioprocesses. Canonical models, like power-laws within the Biochemical Systems Theory, offer numerous mathematical and numerical advantages, including built-in flexibility to simulate general nonlinear behavior. The construction of such models relies on the estimation of unknown case-specific model parameters by way of experimental data fitting, also known as inverse modeling. Despite the large number of publications on this topic, this task remains the bottleneck in canonical modeling of biochemical systems. The focus of this paper concerns with the question of identifiability of power-law models from dynamic data, that is, whether the parameter values can be uniquely and accurately identified from time-series data. Existing and newly developed parameter identifiability methods were applied to two power-law models of biochemical systems, and the results pointed to the lack of parametric identifiability as the root cause of the difficulty faced in the inverse modeling. Despite the focus on power-law models, the analyses and conclusions are extendable to other canonical models, and the issue of parameter identifiability is expected to be a common problem in biochemical system modeling.

[1]  James V. Beck,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science , 1977 .

[2]  Keith R. Godfrey The identifiability of parameters of models used in biomedicine , 1986 .

[3]  A Sorribas,et al.  Structure identifiability in metabolic pathways: parameter estimation in models based on the power-law formalism. , 1994, The Biochemical journal.

[4]  I. E. Nikerel,et al.  Model reduction and a priori kinetic parameter identifiability analysis using metabolome time series for metabolic reaction networks with linlog kinetics. , 2009, Metabolic engineering.

[5]  F. Doyle,et al.  Importance of input perturbations and stochastic gene expression in the reverse engineering of genetic regulatory networks: insights from an identifiability analysis of an in silico network. , 2003, Genome research.

[6]  Jonas S. Almeida,et al.  Decoupling dynamical systems for pathway identification from metabolic profiles , 2004, Bioinform..

[7]  Ewart R. Carson,et al.  The mathematical modeling of metabolic and endocrine systems : model formulation, identification, and validation , 1983 .

[8]  Vipul Periwal,et al.  Methods to Identify Cellular Architecture and Dynamics from Experimental Data , 2006 .

[9]  Jens Timmer,et al.  Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models , 2007, Bioinform..

[10]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  Parameter estimation and optimal experimental design. , 2008, Essays in biochemistry.

[11]  H. Kitano Computational systems biology , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Hua Wu,et al.  Parametric sensitivity in chemical systems , 1999 .

[13]  Jonas S. Almeida,et al.  Identification of neutral biochemical network models from time series data , 2009, BMC Syst. Biol..

[14]  Feng-Sheng Wang,et al.  S-system approach to modeling recombinant Escherichia coli growth by hybrid differential evolution with data collocation , 2006 .

[15]  J E Bailey,et al.  MCA has more to say. , 1996, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  N. V. van Riel Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments. , 2006, Briefings in bioinformatics.

[17]  A. Emery,et al.  Optimal experiment design , 1998 .

[18]  V. Fairén,et al.  Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. , 1997, Mathematical biosciences.

[19]  S. Kimura,et al.  Inference of S-system Models of Genetic Networks from Noisy Time-series Data , 2004 .

[20]  Ursula Klingmüller,et al.  Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood , 2009, Bioinform..

[21]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  Power-law models of signal transduction pathways. , 2007, Cellular signalling.

[22]  Juergen Hahn,et al.  Parameter Set Selection via Clustering of Parameters into Pairwise Indistinguishable Groups of Parameters , 2009 .

[23]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Experimental Design in Systems Biology, Based on Parameter Sensitivity Analysis Using a Monte Carlo Method: A Case Study for the TNFα-Mediated NF-κ B Signal Transduction Pathway , 2003, Simul..

[24]  Brian Ingalls,et al.  Sensitivity analysis: from model parameters to system behaviour. , 2008, Essays in biochemistry.

[25]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  An Automated Procedure for the Extraction of Metabolic Network Information from Time Series Data , 2006, J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol..

[26]  I. Chou,et al.  Recent developments in parameter estimation and structure identification of biochemical and genomic systems. , 2009, Mathematical biosciences.

[27]  W. S. Hlavacek,et al.  Rules for coupled expression of regulator and effector genes in inducible circuits. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  A. Sorribas,et al.  Cooperativity and saturation in biochemical networks: A saturable formalism using Taylor series approximations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[29]  T. Turányi Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications , 1990 .

[30]  David W. Bacon,et al.  Modeling Ethylene/Butene Copolymerization with Multi‐site Catalysts: Parameter Estimability and Experimental Design , 2003 .

[31]  Natal A. W. van Riel,et al.  Dynamic modelling and analysis of biochemical networks: mechanism-based models and model-based experiments , 2006, Briefings Bioinform..

[32]  Jorge E Jiménez-Hornero,et al.  Structural identifiability of a model for the acetic acid fermentation process. , 2008, Mathematical biosciences.

[33]  J. Banga,et al.  Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[34]  Eberhard O. Voit,et al.  Computational Analysis of Biochemical Systems: A Practical Guide for Biochemists and Molecular Biologists , 2000 .

[35]  J J DiStefano,et al.  Multiexponential, multicompartmental, and noncompartmental modeling. II. Data analysis and statistical considerations. , 1984, The American journal of physiology.

[36]  A Sorribas,et al.  Strategies for representing metabolic pathways within biochemical systems theory: reversible pathways. , 1989, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Iterative approach to model identification of biological networks , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[38]  Rudiyanto Gunawan,et al.  Methods to Identify Cellular Architecture and Dynamics from Experimental Data , 2006 .

[39]  E. Voit,et al.  Regulation of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis: an unfinished systems biological case study. , 2006, Systems biology.

[40]  E. Voit,et al.  Challenges in lin-log modelling of glycolysis in Lactococcus lactis. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[41]  H. Kitano Systems Biology: A Brief Overview , 2002, Science.