In Vivo Hemodynamic Evaluation of CH-VAD in a Bovine Model for 14 Days

The CH-VAD is a centrifugal-flow magnetically levitated (maglev) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) used to treat end-stage heart failure. It is implanted in the chest cavity; the inflow cannula is inserted into the apex of the left ventricle, and the outflow graft is anastomosed to the aorta. Among several key VAD system improvements, the CH-VAD has a smaller body size than other LVADs and its maglev system offers a large-gap design that makes it superior in terms of hemocompatibility. In this study, we implanted the CH-VAD in a calf and evaluated the hemodynamic and hemocompatibility characteristics over a 14-day period. The hemodynamic parameters, the pump data, and blood test results were recorded throughout the study. The results showed that the CH-VAD provided hemodynamic stability. Hemocompatibility testing indicated negligible hemolysis throughout the study, and no signs of infection were seen. On necropsy, the results showed only expected focal mild-to-moderate adhesions between the pericardial sac (along the pump) and the adjacent rib cage, and between the pericardial sac and the heart. Gross examination of internal organs was unremarkable. Examination of the CH-VAD after explantation revealed no evidence of thrombus formation internally or around the inflow or outflow cannulas.

[1]  Nader Moazami,et al.  An analysis of pump thrombus events in patients in the HeartWare ADVANCE bridge to transplant and continued access protocol trial. , 2014, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[2]  W S Pierce,et al.  Platelet and Fibrinogen Survival in Calves Implanted with Artificial Heart and Ventricular Assist Device -Correlation with Autopsy Findings , 1992, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[3]  Leen Vercaemst,et al.  Hemolysis in cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: a review in search of a treatment algorithm. , 2008, The journal of extra-corporeal technology.

[4]  Filip Rega,et al.  Clinical benefits of partial circulatory support in New York Heart Association Class IIIB and Early Class IV patients. , 2011, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[5]  William E Cohn,et al.  State of the art of mechanical circulatory support. , 2014, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[6]  J M Fuqua,et al.  In vivo evaluation of an intraventricular electric axial flow pump for left ventricular assistance. , 1994, ASAIO journal.

[7]  Daniel Timms,et al.  A review of clinical ventricular assist devices. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Rebecca Peterson,et al.  Antibiotic-Associated Eosinophilic and Occlusive Arteritis in Calves Complicating Preclinical Studies of Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2013, Toxicologic pathology.

[9]  M. Fornage,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2017, Circulation.