Effects of CT section thickness and reconstruction kernel on emphysema quantification relationship to the magnitude of the CT emphysema index.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Computed tomography (CT) section thickness and reconstruction kernel each influence CT measurements of emphysema. This study was performed to assess whether their effects are related to the magnitude of the measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Low-radiation-dose multidetector CT was performed in 21 subjects representing a wide range of emphysema severity. Images were reconstructed using 20 different combinations of section thickness and reconstruction kernel. Emphysema index values were determined as the percentage of lung pixels having attenuation lower than multiple thresholds ranging from -960 HU to -890 HU. The index values obtained from the different thickness-kernel combinations were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots of mean versus difference in all subjects, and correlated with quantitative histology (mean linear intercept, Lm) in a subset of resected lung specimens. RESULTS The effects of section thickness and reconstruction kernel on the emphysema index were significant (P < .001) and diminished as the index attenuation threshold was raised. The changes in index values from changing the thickness-kernel combination were largest for subjects with intermediate index values (10%-30%), and became progressively smaller for those with lower and higher index values. This pattern was consistent regardless of the thickness-kernel combinations compared and the HU threshold used. Correlations between the emphysema index values obtained with each thickness-kernel combination and Lm ranged from r = 0.55-0.68 (P = .007-.03). CONCLUSION The effects of CT section thickness and kernel on emphysema index values varied systematically with the magnitude of the emphysema index. All reconstruction techniques provided significant correlations with quantitative histology.

[1]  Matthias Ochs,et al.  How much is there really? Why stereology is essential in lung morphometry. , 2007, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2007, Radiology.

[3]  H. Fehrenbach Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. What does Lm tell us about lung pathology? , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[4]  S Muro,et al.  Body mass index in male patients with COPD: correlation with low attenuation areas on CT , 2008, Thorax.

[5]  H. Rossiter,et al.  Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. Assessment of emphysema benefits from quantification of heterogeneity. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[6]  Jonathan G Goldin,et al.  Emphysema: effect of reconstruction algorithm on CT imaging measures. , 2004, Radiology.

[7]  H. Coxson,et al.  Quantitative Computed Tomography of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease1 , 2005 .

[8]  N. Müller,et al.  "Density mask". An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. , 1988, Chest.

[9]  B. Make,et al.  Genetic determinants of emphysema distribution in the national emphysema treatment trial. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[10]  E. Weibel,et al.  Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. To be or not to be-accurate. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  Susan Murray,et al.  Sex differences in severe pulmonary emphysema. , 2007, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  T. Louis,et al.  Feasibility of retinoids for the treatment of emphysema study. , 2006, Chest.

[13]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Integrated system for CT-based assessment of parenchymal lung disease , 2002, Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging.

[14]  Dmitriy A Yablonskiy,et al.  Hyperpolarized 3He diffusion MRI and histology in pulmonary emphysema , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  J. Reilly,et al.  Using computed tomographic scanning to advance understanding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2006, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[16]  Jin Hwan Kim,et al.  Comparison of standard- and low-radiation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Advanced emphysema in African-American and white patients: do differences exist? , 2006, Chest.

[18]  Stephen Lam,et al.  The effects of radiation dose and CT manufacturer on measurements of lung densitometry. , 2007, Chest.

[19]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[20]  Yasutaka Nakano,et al.  Airway wall thickening and emphysema show independent familial aggregation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2008, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  P De Vuyst,et al.  Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. , 1996, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[22]  W. Mitzner Use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[23]  G J Kemerink,et al.  CT lung densitometry: dependence of CT number histograms on sample volume and consequences for scan protocol comparability. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[24]  P. Friedman Imaging studies in emphysema. , 2008, Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society.

[25]  P. Gevenois,et al.  Pulmonary emphysema: objective quantification at multi-detector row CT--comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. , 2006, Radiology.

[26]  L. Fabbri,et al.  Association between markers of emphysema and more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , 2006, Thorax.

[27]  Raúl San José Estépar,et al.  Gender differences in the severity of CT emphysema in COPD. , 2007, Chest.

[28]  H. Coxson,et al.  Quantitative computed tomography of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[29]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. Pattern of parenchymal destruction determines lung function decline. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[30]  D. Altman,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading , 1995, The Lancet.

[31]  Jason H T Bates Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. Purists versus pragmatists. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[32]  J. Mata Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. Mean airspace chord length and hyperpolarized gas magnetic-resonance measurements. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[33]  I. Greaves Commentaries on viewpoint: use of mean airspace chord length to assess emphysema. Mean airspace chord length is useful in assessing emphysema. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[34]  Lene Theil Skovgaard,et al.  Progress of emphysema in severe α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency as Assessed by Annual CT , 1997 .

[35]  B. M. Wright,et al.  Postmortem inflation and fixation of human lungs , 1974, Thorax.

[36]  Talissa A Altes,et al.  Characterization of the relation between CT technical parameters and accuracy of quantification of lung attenuation on quantitative chest CT. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[38]  A. Dirksen,et al.  Progress of emphysema in severe alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency as assessed by annual CT. , 1997, Acta radiologica.

[39]  C. Mittermayer,et al.  Standardized fixation of human lung for radiology and morphometry; Description of a "two chamber"-system with formaldehyde vapor inflation. , 1978, Pathology, research and practice.