Altered Response Evaluation Monitoring of Late Responses After Administration of D-Amphetamine

Recently, D-amphetamine was shown to increase the error negativity, the so-called "response Ne/ERN," after incorrect choices of hand. We investigated whether this stimulation of action monitoring would also be present in the monitoring of late responses, reflected in the "late Ne/ERN." Twelve healthy volunteers performed a speeded choice-reaction task on two separate occasions on which either D-amphetamine or a placebo was administered. The results showed a clear late Ne/ERN following too late (TL) responses, but the amplitude of this late Ne/ERN was not affected by treatment condition. An error positivity (Pe) was present after the late Ne/ERN in the placebo condition, but not in the amphetamine condition. Also, P2a amplitudes following TL feedback were larger after administration of amphetamine compared to placebo. Questionnaires filled in by participants showed that they overrated their own speed and accuracy after administration of amphetamine. Overall, this suggests that the stimulating aspects of amphetamine lead to changes in affective and motivational evaluation of errors and performance in general. Therefore, along with the established cognitive contributions, the current results provide evidence for an important role of affective processes in action monitoring and the effects they have on accompanying ERP components.

[1]  D. Tucker,et al.  Medial Frontal Cortex in Action Monitoring , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[3]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of errors in reaction tasks. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[5]  Salil H. Patel,et al.  Impact of instructed relevance on the visual ERP. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[7]  W. Hulstijn,et al.  Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[8]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Why is there an ERN/Ne on correct trials? Response representations, stimulus-related components, and the theory of error-processing , 2001, Biological Psychology.

[9]  G. Karmos,et al.  Perspectives of Event-Related Potentials Research , 1995 .

[10]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[11]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[12]  Patricia E Pailing,et al.  Error negativity and response control. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[13]  K. Richard Ridderinkhof,et al.  Alcohol Consumption Impairs Detection of Performance Errors in Mediofrontal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[14]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  Rogier B. Mars,et al.  De Bruijn ERA, Mars RB, & Hulstijn W It wasn't me... or was it? How false feedback affects performance , 2004 .

[16]  G. Potts An ERP index of task relevance evaluation of visual stimuli , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[17]  D. Tucker,et al.  Electrophysiological Responses to Errors and Feedback in the Process of Action Regulation , 2003, Psychological science.

[18]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[20]  Antoine Bechara,et al.  Risky Business: Emotion, Decision-Making, and Addiction , 2004, Journal of Gambling Studies.