Please Scroll down for Article Visual Cognition the Role of Temporal Synchrony in Perceptual Object Formation and Updating

The appearance and disappearance of an object in the visual field is accompanied by changes to multiple visual features at the object's location. When features at a location change asynchronously, the cue of common onset and offset becomes unreliable, with observers tending to report the most recent pairing of features. Here, we use these last feature reports to study the conditions that lead to a new object representation rather than an update to an existing representation. Experiments 1 and 2 establish that last feature reports predominate in asynchronous displays when feature durations are brief. Experiments 3 and 4 demonstrate that these reports also are critically influenced by whether features can be grouped using nontemporal cues such as common shape or location. The results are interpreted within the object-updating framework (Enns, Lleras, & Moore, 2010), which proposes that human vision is biased to represent a rapid image sequence as one or more objects changing over time.

[1]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  M. Chun,et al.  The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  D. Raab,et al.  Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  B. Bridgeman.  Temporal response characteristics of cells in monkey striate cortex measured with metacontrast masking and brightness discrimination , 1980, Brain Research.

[5]  J. Enns,et al.  Space and Time in Perception and Action: Object updating: a force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision , 2010 .

[6]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  Extrapolation or attention shift? , 1995, Nature.

[8]  G. DeAngelis,et al.  Does Neuronal Synchrony Underlie Visual Feature Grouping? , 2005, Neuron.

[9]  J. Enns.  Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  C Koch,et al.  Seeing properties of an invisible object: Feature inheritance and shine-through , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  On the role of object representations in substitution masking. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  C. Moore,et al.  When the target becomes the mask: using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  L. Robertson.  Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[15]  J T Enns,et al.  The duration of a brief event in the mind's eye. , 1999, The Journal of general psychology.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Predictability and the Dynamics of Position Processing in the Flash-Lag Effect , 2005, Perception.

[18]  A. Treisman.  The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Saumil S. Patel,et al.  Color and motion: which is the tortoise and which is the hare? , 2003, Vision Research.

[20]  Andreas K. Engel,et al.  Temporal Binding, Binocular Rivalry, and Consciousness , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[21]  K. Moutoussis,et al.  Functional segregation and temporal hierarchy of the visual perceptive systems , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  A. Leventhal,et al.  Signal timing across the macaque visual system. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  S. Nishida,et al.  Marker Correspondence, Not Processing Latency, Determines Temporal Binding of Visual Attributes , 2002, Current Biology.

[24]  Mark A. Elliott,et al.  A Moment to Reflect upon Perceptual Synchrony , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Objects, Attributes, and Visual Attention: Which, What, and Where , 1992 .

[26]  G. Sperling,et al.  Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. , 1987, Science.

[27]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  A negative compatibility effect in priming of emotional faces , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[29]  M. Chappell,et al.  Dividing attention in the flash-lag illusion , 2007, Vision Research.

[30]  J. Enns.  Visual binding in the standing wave illusion , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  G. Davis,et al.  Can Attention Select Only a Fixed Number of Objects at a Time? , 2001, Perception.

[32]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[33]  Talis Bachmann,et al.  Temporal limitations in the effective binding of attended target attributes in the mutual masking of visual objects. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  Marcus Vinícius C Baldo,et al.  The Modulation of the Flash-Lag Effect by Voluntary Attention , 2004, Perception.

[35]  A. Holcombe.  A Purely Temporal Transparency Mechanism in the Visual System , 2001, Perception.

[36]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  J. Enns,et al.  Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  James T. Enns,et al.  The path of least persistence: Object status mediates visual updating , 2007, Vision Research.

[39]  S. Klein,et al.  Evidence for an Attentional Component of the Perceptual Misalignment between Moving and Flashing Stimuli , 2002, Perception.

[40]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[41]  P. Bennett,et al.  Generalized Common Fate: Grouping by Common Luminance Changes , 2001, Psychological science.

[42]  Greg Davis,et al.  Reversal of object-based benefits in visual attention , 2005 .

[43]  James T. Enns,et al.  Visual masking plays two roles in the attentional blink , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[44]  Jane E Raymond,et al.  New Objects, Not New Features, Trigger the Attentional Blink , 2003, Psychological science.

[45]  W Singer,et al.  Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Asynchronous processing in vision Color leads motion , 2001, Current Biology.

[48]  P. Mamassian,et al.  The effects of task and saliency on latencies for colour and motion processing , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  J. Duncan.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  A. Wilson,et al.  Transposition in backward masking the case of the travelling gap , 1985, Vision Research.

[51]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[52]  Marius Usher,et al.  Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception , 1998, Nature.

[53]  S. Zeki,et al.  A direct demonstration of perceptual asynchrony in vision , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  Perceptual pairing of colour and motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[55]  John R. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and visual attention , 1985 .

[56]  Alexander B. Bilsky,et al.  Parallel processing of park-whole information in visual search tasks , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  Trevor J. Hine,et al.  Attention ‘capture’ by the flash-lag flash , 2006, Vision Research.

[58]  C. Spence,et al.  CHAPTER 15 – Prior Entry , 2005 .

[59]  R Blake,et al.  Visual form created solely from temporal structure. , 1999, Science.

[60]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent, synchronous access to color and motion features , 2008, Cognition.

[61]  Derek H. Arnold,et al.  A paradox of temporal perception revealed by a stimulus oscillating in colour and orientation , 2003, Vision Research.

[62]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[63]  V. Lamme.  Towards a true neural stance on consciousness , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.