Do Bitcoin Users Really Care About Anonymity? An Analysis of the Bitcoin Transaction Graph

The pseudonymous nature of Bitcoin has sparked the twin rivaling researches in Bitcoin community, that is, either protecting or attacking anonymity. In spite of this intense battle, the answer to a primary question is absent – Do Bitcoin users themselves care about anonymity? This paper demystifies this doubt via analyzing the Bitcoin transaction graphs with the following three contributions: 1). We outline three representative metrics that can signify whether users concern about anonymity. 2). We examine the collective trend of anonymity concerns from a macroscope. 3). We pay particular attention on critical addresses in a microscope to unveil their anonymity concerns.This paper arrives at both expected conclusions and unexpected surprises. In particular, the expected ones are: rich addresses concern more about anonymity than poor ones. Miner addresses start caring about anonymity when exchange rate soars. Stock addresses never hide their intent of jump-and-dump. The surprises are: the majority of the users show weak concerns on anonymity. One can easily find both hot and cold wallet addresses owned by big organizations.

[1]  Alex Biryukov,et al.  Deanonymisation of Clients in Bitcoin P2P Network , 2014, CCS.

[2]  Pedro Moreno-Sanchez,et al.  CoinShuffle: Practical Decentralized Coin Mixing for Bitcoin , 2014, ESORICS.

[3]  Danton Bryans,et al.  Bitcoin and Money Laundering: Mining for an Effective Solution , 2013 .

[4]  Fergal Reid,et al.  An Analysis of Anonymity in the Bitcoin System , 2011, PASSAT 2011.

[5]  Philip Koshy CoinSeer: A Telescope Into Bitcoin , 2013 .

[6]  Deepak Puthal,et al.  Everything You Wanted to Know About the Blockchain: Its Promise, Components, Processes, and Problems , 2018, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine.

[7]  Stefan Katzenbeisser,et al.  Structure and Anonymity of the Bitcoin Transaction Graph , 2013, Future Internet.

[8]  Adoption of Security and Privacy Measures in Bitcoin – Stated and Actual Behavior , 2018 .

[9]  H. Howie Huang,et al.  iBFS: Concurrent Breadth-First Search on GPUs , 2016, SIGMOD Conference.

[10]  Malte Möser,et al.  An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem , 2013, 2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit.

[11]  Jeremy Clark,et al.  Mixcoin: Anonymity for Bitcoin with Accountable Mixes , 2014, Financial Cryptography.

[12]  Patrick D. McDaniel,et al.  An Analysis of Anonymity in Bitcoin Using P2P Network Traffic , 2014, Financial Cryptography.

[13]  Sadia Afroz,et al.  Backpage and Bitcoin: Uncovering Human Traffickers , 2017, KDD.

[14]  Ravikiran Vatrapu,et al.  Breaking Bad: De-Anonymising Entity Types on the Bitcoin Blockchain Using Supervised Machine Learning , 2018, HICSS.

[15]  Benjamin Fabian,et al.  Anonymity in Bitcoin? - The Users' Perspective , 2016, ICIS.

[16]  Stefano Zanero,et al.  BitIodine: Extracting Intelligence from the Bitcoin Network , 2014, Financial Cryptography.

[17]  Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin : A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System , 2009 .

[18]  Pramod Viswanath,et al.  Dandelion , 2017, Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst..

[19]  S A R A H M E I K L E J O H N,et al.  A Fistful of Bitcoins Characterizing Payments Among Men with No Names , 2013 .