Efficiency Gains from “What”-Flexibility in Climate Policy An Integrated CGE Assessment

We investigate the importance of OwhatO-flexibility on top of OwhereO- and OwhenO-flexibility for alternative emission control schemes that prescribe long-term temperature targets and eventually impose additional constraints on the rate of temperature change. We find that OwhatO-flexibility substantially reduces the economic adjustment costs. When comparing policies that simply involve long-term temperature targets against more stringent strategies with constraints on the rate of temperature increase, it turns out that the latter involve much higher costs. The cost difference may be interpreted as additional insurance payments if climate damages should not only depend on absolute temperature change but also on the rate of temperature change.

[1]  Bruno Jullien,et al.  Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the ‘Precautionary Principle’ , 2000 .

[2]  Conseil Mondial De L'energie.  Global energy perspectives to 2050 and beyond , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem: An Overview of the Modeling Framework and Syntax , 1999 .

[4]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[5]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Approximating infinite-horizon models in a complementarity format: A primer in dynamic general equilibrium analysis , 2002 .

[6]  Robert McDougall,et al.  Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base , 2002 .

[7]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Integrated assessments of mitigation, impacts and adaptation to climate change , 1995 .

[8]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases , 2001, Nature.

[9]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[10]  P. Zusman.  Spatial and temporal price and allocation models , 1971 .

[11]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming , 2000 .

[12]  Joseph Alcamo,et al.  Emission scenarios and global climate protection , 1996 .

[13]  Michael Grubb,et al.  The Costs of Limiting Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: A Survey and Analysis , 1993 .

[14]  L. Goulder.  Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide , 1994 .

[15]  Stephen C. Peck,et al.  Optimal carbon emissions trajectories when damages depend on the rate or level of global warming , 1994 .

[16]  A. Bovenberg,et al.  Green Tax Reforms and the Double Dividend: an Updated Reader's Guide , 1999 .

[17]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  MERGE. A model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies , 1995 .

[18]  T. Rutherford.  Extension of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economic analysis , 1995 .

[19]  S. Dirkse,et al.  The path solver: a nommonotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems , 1995 .

[20]  H. Uzawa,et al.  Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth , 1969, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Carbon Abatement and International Spillovers , 2002 .

[22]  Paul S. Armington.  A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production (Une théorie de la demande de produits différenciés d'après leur origine) (Una teoría de la demanda de productos distinguiéndolos según el lugar de producción) , 1969 .