Assessments of disclosure from the in-laws: Links among disclosure topics, family privacy orientations, and relational quality

This study investigated newlyweds' perceptions of private disclosures received from their in-laws and the outcomes of such disclosures for their familial relationships. In Study 1, 271 married individuals participated in a study designed to develop scales measuring relevant variables. Participants in Study 2 were 107 recently married individuals who completed online questionnaires. Results indicated that in-laws' disclosure regarding acceptance of the participant positively influences relational outcomes, whereas in-laws' slanderous disclosure about family members negatively influences relational outcomes. In-laws' disclosures about relational trouble and about the family's historical identity also influence relational outcomes, and, in some cases, those relationships are moderated by family privacy orientation of the participant. Perceived in-group status within the in-laws' family was positively correlated with in-law satisfaction.

[1]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[2]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Family Secrets: Forms, Functions and Correlates , 1994 .

[3]  Ann Goetting,et al.  Patterns of Support Among In-Laws in the United States , 1990 .

[4]  J. Caughlin.  Family communication standards: What counts as excellent family communication and how are such standards associated with family satisfaction? , 2003 .

[5]  C. Duran-Aydintug.  Relationships with Former In-Laws:: Normative Guidelines and Actual Behavior , 1993 .

[6]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Ideology in Interpersonal Communication: Off the Couch and into the World , 1981 .

[7]  Szu-Chia Chang,et al.  Perceptions of commitment change during mate selection: The case of Taiwanese newlyweds , 2007 .

[8]  I. Meyerstein.  A SYSTEMIC APPROACH TO IN-LAW DILEMMAS , 1996 .

[9]  R. Milardo,et al.  Network Overlap and Third-Party Influence in Close Relationships , 2000 .

[10]  Diane Felmlee,et al.  No Couple Is an Island: A Social Network Perspective on Dyadic Stability , 2001 .

[11]  S. Petronio.  Boundaries of Privacy: Dialectics of Disclosure , 2002 .

[12]  J. Jorgenson.  Where is the “family” in family communication?: Exploring families' self‐definitions , 1989 .

[13]  J. Veroff,et al.  Family Ties and the Discontinuity of Divorce in Black and White Newlywed Couples , 2000 .

[14]  S. Price,et al.  Former in-laws as a source of support , 1992 .

[15]  S. Petronio,et al.  Intrafamily secrets in various family configurations: A communication boundary management perspective , 2000 .

[16]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Criteria for revealing family secrets , 2001 .

[17]  Anita L. Vangelisti,et al.  Revealing Family Secrets: The Influence of Topic, Function, and Relationships , 1997 .

[18]  Michael L. Hecht,et al.  Multivariate indices of the effects of self‐disclosure , 1979 .

[19]  D. C. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Relating Difficulty : The Processes of Constructing and Managing Difficult Interaction , 2006 .

[20]  D. Olson,et al.  Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. Theoretical update. , 1983, Family process.

[21]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.