PSO-Based Adaptive Perturb and Observe MPPT Technique for Photovoltaic Systems

The classical method of perturb and observe (P&O) is mostly utilized because of it is simple technique, ease of implementation and low cost. Although, it has high oscillations around maximum power point (MPP) at steady state due to perturbation and challenge between step size and the convergence time. To avoid the drawbacks of classical P&O methods, this paper presents adaptive P&O using optimized proportional integral (PI) controller by particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. To evaluate the proposed method, a PV system model is designed with different scenarios under various weather conditions. For each scenario, simulations are carried out and the results are compared with the other classical P&O MPPT methods. The results revealed that the proposed PSO-PI-P&O MPPT method improved the tracking performance, response to the fast changing weather conditions and also has less oscillation around MPP as compared to the classical P&O methods.

[1]  Giuseppe Carannante,et al.  Experimental Performance of MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Sources Subject to Inhomogeneous Insolation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Djalel Dib,et al.  MPPT control in wind energy conversion systems and the application of fractional control (PIα) in pitch wind turbine , 2016, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[3]  Ahmad Taher Azar,et al.  Control-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking for a Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System Optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization , 2021, Research Anthology on Clean Energy Management and Solutions.

[4]  Ali Faisal Murtaza,et al.  Power tracking techniques for efficient operation of photovoltaic array in solar applications – A review , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[5]  Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz,et al.  A comparison of different global MPPT techniques based on meta-heuristic algorithms for photovoltaic system subjected to partial shading conditions , 2017 .

[6]  Tânia Sousa,et al.  A review of the use of exergy to evaluate the sustainability of fossil fuels and non-fuel mineral depletion , 2017 .

[7]  Ahmad Taher Azar,et al.  A second-order sliding mode and fuzzy logic control to optimal energy management in wind turbine with battery storage , 2017, Neural Computing and Applications.

[8]  Ramazan Akkaya,et al.  A genetic algorithm optimized ANN-based MPPT algorithm for a stand-alone PV system with induction motor drive , 2012 .

[9]  Syafaruddin,et al.  A comprehensive MATLAB Simulink PV system simulator with partial shading capability based on two-diode model , 2011 .

[10]  C. H. Cox,et al.  Experimental tests of open-loop maximum-power-point tracking techniques for photovoltaic arrays , 1984 .

[11]  A. Messai,et al.  FPGA-based real time implementation of MPPT-controller for photovoltaic systems , 2011 .

[12]  D. Petreus,et al.  A novel MPPT (maximum power point tracking) algorithm based on a modified genetic algorithm specialized on tracking the global maximum power point in photovoltaic systems affected by partial shading , 2014 .

[13]  Marcelo Gradella Villalva,et al.  Comprehensive Approach to Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Arrays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[14]  A. Rezaee Jordehi,et al.  Parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic (PV) cells: A review , 2016 .

[15]  James Kennedy,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 2002, Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks.

[16]  A. Rezaee Jordehi,et al.  Parameter selection in particle swarm optimisation: a survey , 2013, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Jubaer Ahmed,et al.  An Enhanced Adaptive P&O MPPT for Fast and Efficient Tracking Under Varying Environmental Conditions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[18]  Whei-Min Lin,et al.  Neural-Network-Based MPPT Control of a Stand-Alone Hybrid Power Generation System , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[19]  Ahmad Taher Azar,et al.  Effective supervisory controller to extend optimal energy management in hybrid wind turbine under energy and reliability constraints , 2018 .

[20]  Nashwa Ahmad Kamal,et al.  Conventional, Intelligent, and Fractional-Order Control Method for Maximum Power Point Tracking of a Photovoltaic System: A Review , 2018 .

[21]  S. K. Kollimalla,et al.  A Novel Adaptive P&O MPPT Algorithm Considering Sudden Changes in the Irradiance , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[22]  Toshihiko Noguchi,et al.  Short-current pulse-based maximum-power-point tracking method for multiple photovoltaic-and-converter module system , 2002, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[23]  S Ahmed,et al.  High-Performance Adaptive Perturb and Observe MPPT Technique for Photovoltaic-Based Microgrids , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[24]  P.L. Chapman,et al.  Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[25]  T. T. Yetayew,et al.  Evaluation of fuzzy logic based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic power system , 2015, 2015 IEEE Power, Communication and Information Technology Conference (PCITC).

[26]  Kashif Ishaque,et al.  An improved modeling method to determine the model parameters of photovoltaic (PV) modules using differential evolution (DE) , 2011 .

[27]  D. Honnery,et al.  Global renewable energy resources and use in 2050 , 2019, Managing Global Warming.

[28]  Necmi Altin,et al.  Fuzzy logic based MPPT controller for high conversion ratio quadratic boost converter , 2017 .

[29]  Douglas L. Maskell,et al.  Computational intelligence techniques for maximum power point tracking in PV systems: A review , 2018 .

[30]  Ahmad Taher Azar,et al.  Robust Adaptive Supervisory Fractional Order Controller for Optimal Energy Management in Wind Turbine with Battery Storage , 2017, Fractional Order Control and Synchronization of Chaotic Systems.

[31]  N. Jenkins,et al.  A model of PV generation suitable for stability analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.