Performance comparison between the filtered-error LMS and the filtered-X LMS algorithms [ANC]

Several properties of the filtered-error (filtered-E) least mean square (LMS) algorithm, such as the stability condition, the upper limit of the step size and the variance of the error signal are quantitatively evaluated and compared with the those of the filtered-X LMS algorithm. For this purpose, the averaging method and the ordinary differential equation (ODE) method are applied to the frequency domain expression of both algorithms. From the averaged system, it is demonstrated that the stability condition and the upper limit of the step size of the filtered-E LMS algorithm are the same as those of the filtered-X LMS algorithm. On the other hand, from the ODE analysis, it is shown that the excess mean square error of the filtered-E LMS algorithm is two thirds of that of the filtered-X LMS algorithm.

[1]  Hideaki Sakai,et al.  Convergence analysis of the delayless subband adaptive filter based on the frequency domain expression , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37100).

[2]  Neil J. Bershad,et al.  A frequency domain model for 'filtered' LMS algorithms-stability analysis, design, and elimination of the training mode , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Eric A. Wan,et al.  Adjoint LMS: an efficient alternative to the filtered-x LMS and multiple error LMS algorithms , 1996, 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings.