Blockage and Handoffs in IEEE 802 . 11 ad based 60 GHz Picocells-A Closer Look

The link misalignment and high susceptibility to blockages are the biggest hurdles in realizing 60 GHz based wireless local area networks (WLANs). However, much of the previous studies investigating 60 GHz alignment and blockage issues do not provide an accurate quantitative evaluation from the perspective of WLANs. In this paper, we present an in-depth quantitative evaluation of commodity IEEE 802.11ad devices by forming a 60 GHz WLAN with two docking stations mimicking as access points (APs). Through extensive experiments, we provide important insights about directional coverage pattern of antennas, communication range and co-channel interference and blockages. We are able to measure the IEEE 802.11ad link alignment and association overheads in absolute time units. With a very high accuracy (96-97%), our blockage characterization can differentiate between temporary and permanent blockages caused by humans in the indoor environment, which is a key insight. Utilizing our blockage characterization, we also demonstrate intelligent handoff to alternate APs using consumergrade IEEE 802.11ad devices. Our blockage-induced handoff experiments provide important insights that would be helpful in integrating millimeter wave based WLANs into future wireless networks.

[1]  Sebastian Priebe,et al.  A ray tracing based stochastic human blockage model for the IEEE 802.11ad 60 GHz channel model , 2011, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP).

[2]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work! , 2013, IEEE Access.

[3]  Ben Y. Zhao,et al.  Demystifying 60GHz outdoor picocells , 2014, MobiCom.

[4]  Li Sun,et al.  Improving Connectivity, Coverage, and Capacity in 60 GHz Indoor WLANs Using Relays , 2015, S3@MobiCom.

[5]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  60 GHz Indoor Networking through Flexible Beams: A Link-Level Profiling , 2015, SIGMETRICS 2015.

[6]  Marina Petrova,et al.  Empirical characterization of mm-wave communication links in realistic indoor scenarios , 2015, 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[7]  Ignas G. Niemegeers,et al.  CogCell: cognitive interplay between 60 GHz picocells and 2.4/5 GHz hotspots in the 5G era , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Ignas G. Niemegeers,et al.  60 GHz MAC standardization: Progress and way forward , 2015, 2015 12th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC).

[9]  Jörg Widmer,et al.  Boon and bane of 60 GHz networks: practical insights into beamforming, interference, and frame level operation , 2015, CoNEXT.

[10]  Dimitrios Koutsonikolas,et al.  60 GHz Multi-Gigabit Indoor WLANs: Dream or Reality? , 2015, ArXiv.

[11]  Gek Hong Sim,et al.  Millimeter-wave blind spots: Mitigating deafness collisions using frame aggregation , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[12]  Marina Petrova,et al.  60 GHz outdoor urban measurement study of the feasibility of multi-Gbps mm-wave cellular networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[13]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  BeamSpy: Enabling Robust 60 GHz Links Under Blockage , 2016, NSDI.

[14]  Parameswaran Ramanathan,et al.  OpenMili: a 60 GHz software radio platform with a reconfigurable phased-array antenna , 2016, MobiCom.

[15]  Edward W. Knightly,et al.  Mobility resilience and overhead constrained adaptation in directional 60 GHz WLANs: protocol design and system implementation , 2016, MobiHoc.

[16]  Danilo De Donno,et al.  Tracking mm-Wave channel dynamics: Fast beam training strategies under mobility , 2016, IEEE INFOCOM 2017 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications.

[17]  Ignas Niemegeers,et al.  Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11ad MAC Protocol , 2017, IEEE Communications Letters.

[18]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Agile Millimeter Wave Networks with Provable Guarantees , 2017, ArXiv.