Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M Rarey,et al. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[2] Christophe Cleva,et al. Chemical substructures in drug discovery. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[3] L. Tong,et al. A highly specific inhibitor of human p38 MAP kinase binds in the ATP pocket , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.
[4] John A. Katzenellenbogen,et al. The estradiol pharmacophore: Ligand structure-estrogen receptor binding affinity relationships and a model for the receptor binding site , 1997, Steroids.
[5] T. Klabunde,et al. Structure-based drug discovery using GPCR homology modeling: successful virtual screening for antagonists of the alpha1A adrenergic receptor. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[6] Marco Macchia,et al. Novel estrogen receptor ligands based on an anthranylaldoxime structure: role of the phenol-type pseudocycle in the binding process. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] E. Bradley,et al. Performance of 3D-database molecular docking studies into homology models. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] K. Luthman,et al. Correlation of drug absorption with molecular surface properties. , 1996, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[9] L. Toledo,et al. The structure-based design of ATP-site directed protein kinase inhibitors. , 1999, Current medicinal chemistry.
[10] Singh,et al. Quantitative structure-property relationships in pharmaceutical research - Part 1. , 2000, Pharmaceutical science & technology today.
[11] G. Klopman. Artificial intelligence approach to structure-activity studies. Computer automated structure evaluation of biological activity of organic molecules , 1985 .
[12] D. E. Clark,et al. Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena. 2. Prediction of blood-brain barrier penetration. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[13] J. Mason,et al. New 4-point pharmacophore method for molecular similarity and diversity applications: overview of the method and applications, including a novel approach to the design of combinatorial libraries containing privileged substructures. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[14] Sergei V. Trepalin,et al. New Diversity Calculations Algorithms Used for Compound Selection , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[15] John D. Walker,et al. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.
[16] Thomas Lengauer,et al. Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[17] P. Selzer,et al. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[18] S Stanley Young,et al. Design of diversity and focused combinatorial libraries in drug discovery. , 2004, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[19] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[20] Gerard J Kleywegt,et al. Application and limitations of X-ray crystallographic data in structure-based ligand and drug design. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.
[21] Pravin Chaturvedi,et al. Design principles for orally bioavailable drugs , 1996 .
[22] W. Pardridge. Transport of small molecules through the blood-brain barrier: biology and methodology. , 1995, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[23] R. Huber,et al. Phosphotransferase and substrate binding mechanism of the cAMP‐dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit from porcine heart as deduced from the 2.0 A structure of the complex with Mn2+ adenylyl imidodiphosphate and inhibitor peptide PKI(5‐24). , 1993, The EMBO journal.
[24] Paul Watson,et al. Virtual Screening Using Protein-Ligand Docking: Avoiding Artificial Enrichment , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] A. Ortiz,et al. Evaluation of docking functions for protein-ligand docking. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[26] G M Pearl,et al. Integration of computational analysis as a sentinel tool in toxicological assessments. , 2001, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[27] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Fingerprint Scaling Increases the Probability of Identifying Molecules with Similar Activity in Virtual Screening Calculations , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[28] M Pastor,et al. VolSurf: a new tool for the pharmacokinetic optimization of lead compounds. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.
[29] Robin Taylor,et al. Simulation Analysis of Experimental Design Strategies for Screening Random Compounds as Potential New Drugs and Agrochemicals , 1995, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[30] S. Venkatesh,et al. Role of the development scientist in compound lead selection and optimization. , 2000, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[31] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[32] V. Ananthanarayanan,et al. Homology model of dihydropyridine receptor: implications for L-type Ca(2+) channel modulation by agonists and antagonists. , 2001, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.
[33] Malcolm J. McGregor,et al. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 1. Application to QSAR and Focused Library Design , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[34] Lemont B. Kier,et al. Differential Molecular Connectivity in Data-Base Fragment Searching , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.
[35] G. Klebe,et al. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[36] P. Jurs,et al. Computer-assisted structure-activity studies of chemical carcinogens. Aromatic amines. , 1981, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[37] George W. A. Milne,et al. An Interactive Substructure Search System , 1977, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[38] G. Müller,et al. Medicinal chemistry of target family-directed masterkeys. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[39] T. Langer,et al. Pharmacophore definition and 3D searches. , 2004, Drug discovery today. Technologies.
[40] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[41] Yi Li,et al. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. 2. Examination of docked ligand orientation sampling methodology: mapping a pharmacophore for success. , 2003, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[42] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[43] R Abagyan,et al. Soft docking an L and a D peptide to an anticholera toxin antibody using internal coordinate mechanics. , 1999, Structure.
[44] Andrew Smellie,et al. Identification of Common Functional Configurations Among Molecules , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[45] S. Ekins. In silico approaches to predicting drug metabolism, toxicology and beyond. , 2003, Biochemical Society transactions.
[46] James F Blake,et al. Integrating cheminformatic analysis in combinatorial chemistry. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[47] Robert P Bywater,et al. Recognition of privileged structures by G-protein coupled receptors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[48] D. Rognan,et al. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[49] Louis Hodes,et al. Selection of molecular fragment features for structure-activity studies in antitumor screening , 1981, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[50] Malcolm J. McGregor,et al. Pharmacophore Fingerprinting. 2. Application to Primary Library Design , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[51] G. Rishton. Nonleadlikeness and leadlikeness in biochemical screening. , 2003, Drug discovery today.
[52] David Weininger,et al. Stigmata: An Algorithm To Determine Structural Commonalities in Diverse Datasets , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[53] Xin Chen,et al. Recursive Partitioning Analysis of a Large Structure-Activity Data Set Using Three-Dimensional Descriptors1 , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[54] J. Wendoloski,et al. Identification of compounds with nanomolar binding affinity for checkpoint kinase-1 using knowledge-based virtual screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[55] Daniel Domine,et al. Fragment analysis in small molecule discovery. , 2002, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[56] P. Sprague. Automated chemical hypothesis generation and database searching with Catalyst , 1995 .
[57] P. Charifson,et al. Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[58] H. Matter,et al. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. , 1997, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[59] Robert Bywater,et al. Improving the Odds in Discriminating "Drug-like" from "Non Drug-like" Compounds , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[60] David S. Goodsell,et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .
[61] P. N. Craig,et al. Carcinogenesis: a predictive structure-activity model. , 1982, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.
[62] M. Murcko,et al. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[63] Y. Martin,et al. Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity? , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[64] H. Kubinyi. Drug research: myths, hype and reality , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[65] A. Good,et al. 3-D pharmacophores in drug discovery. , 2001, Current pharmaceutical design.
[66] H. Kubinyi,et al. A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[67] D. Diller,et al. Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[68] Maria Kontoyianni,et al. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[69] B. Shoichet,et al. A common mechanism underlying promiscuous inhibitors from virtual and high-throughput screening. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[70] Stephen R. Heller,et al. An Application of Interactive Graphics - The Nested Retrieval of Chemical Structures. , 1972 .
[71] Nick A. Farmer,et al. An Interactive Computer Graphics System for Processing Chemical Structure Diagrams , 1977, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[72] I. Muegge,et al. Simple selection criteria for drug-like chemical matter. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[73] Grover,et al. Quantitative structure-property relationships in pharmaceutical research - Part 2. , 2000, Pharmaceutical science & technology today.
[74] D. E. Clark. Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena. 1. Prediction of intestinal absorption. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.
[75] Steven L. Teig,et al. Chemical Function Queries for 3D Database Search , 1994, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[76] Yvonne C. Martin,et al. Use of Structure-Activity Data To Compare Structure-Based Clustering Methods and Descriptors for Use in Compound Selection , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[77] W. L. Jorgensen. The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.
[78] B. Shoichet,et al. A specific mechanism of nonspecific inhibition. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[79] R Langridge,et al. A quantitative structure-activity relationship and molecular graphics analysis of hydrophobic effects in the interactions of inhibitors with alcohol dehydrogenase. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[80] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[81] D R Henry,et al. Structure-antitumor activity relationships of 9-anilinoacridines using pattern recognition. , 1982, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[82] P Willett,et al. Chemoinformatics - similarity and diversity in chemical libraries. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.
[83] Bruce R. Kowalski,et al. A Flexible Interactive Graphics System for Searching Atom Connectivity Matrices , 1976, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[84] Pierre Acklin,et al. Similarity Metrics for Ligands Reflecting the Similarity of the Target Proteins , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[85] Lemont B. Kier,et al. An Electrotopological-State Index for Atoms in Molecules , 1990, Pharmaceutical Research.
[86] W. Patrick Walters,et al. A guide to drug discovery: Designing screens: how to make your hits a hit , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[87] Michael M. Hann,et al. RECAP-Retrosynthetic Combinatorial Analysis Procedure: A Powerful New Technique for Identifying Privileged Molecular Fragments with Useful Applications in Combinatorial Chemistry , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[88] R. Geoff Dromey. A Structural Molecular Formula for Flexible and Efficient Substructure Searching of Large Databases , 1978, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[89] Naomie Salim,et al. Combination of Fingerprint-Based Similarity Coefficients Using Data Fusion , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[90] W Patrick Walters,et al. Prediction of 'drug-likeness'. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[91] Didier Rognan,et al. Protein‐based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of g‐protein coupled receptors suitable targets? , 2002, Proteins.
[92] D. Hawkins,et al. Analysis of a Large Structure‐Activity Data Set Using Recursive Partitioning , 1997 .
[93] Y. Martin,et al. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[94] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[95] Malcolm J. McGregor,et al. Clustering of Large Databases of Compounds: Using the MDL "Keys" as Structural Descriptors , 1997, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[96] G. Harper,et al. The reduced graph descriptor in virtual screening and data-driven clustering of high-throughput screening data. , 2004, Journal of chemical information and computer sciences.
[97] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[98] John Bradshaw,et al. Similarity Searching Using Reduced Graphs , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[99] S. Kim,et al. "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.
[100] Roberto Todeschini,et al. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors , 2002 .
[101] R. Abagyan,et al. Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[102] W Patrick Walters,et al. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.
[103] I. Wilson,et al. Virtual screening of human 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide transformylase against the NCI diversity set by use of AutoDock to identify novel nonfolate inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[104] Stephen K. Durham,et al. Predicting the Genotoxicity of Secondary and Aromatic Amines Using Data Subsetting To Generate a Model Ensemble , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[105] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[106] Stephen D. Pickett,et al. Diversity Profiling and Design Using 3D Pharmacophores: Pharmacophore-Derived Queries (PDQ) , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[107] Wolfgang H. B. Sauer,et al. Molecular Shape Diversity of Combinatorial Libraries: A Prerequisite for Broad Bioactivity , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[108] P Willett,et al. Comparison of algorithms for dissimilarity-based compound selection. , 1997, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[109] Renxiao Wang,et al. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[110] Wolfgang H. B. Sauer,et al. Size doesn't matter: Scaffold diversity shape diversity, and biological activity of combinatorial libraries , 2003 .
[111] P. Hajduk,et al. Privileged molecules for protein binding identified from NMR-based screening. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[112] Man-Ling Lee,et al. DISE: Directed Sphere Exclusion , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[113] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[114] John M. Barnard,et al. Chemical Similarity Searching , 1998, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[115] T. Kennedy. Managing the drug discovery/development interface , 1997 .
[116] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Profile Scaling Increases the Similarity Search Performance of Molecular Fingerprints Containing Numerical Descriptors and Structural Keys , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[117] F. Jørgensen,et al. A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[118] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Similarity Search Profiling Reveals Effects of Fingerprint Scaling in Virtual Screening , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[119] G. Rishton. Reactive compounds and in vitro false positives in HTS , 1997 .
[120] Zhan Deng,et al. Interaction profiles of protein kinase-inhibitor complexes and their application to virtual screening. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[121] J. Bajorath,et al. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[122] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Integration of virtual and high-throughput screening , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[123] Z. Deng,et al. Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[124] E. Jaeger,et al. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. , 2005, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.