Agreeing on Defeasible Commitments

Social commitments are developed for multi-agent systems according to the current practice in law regarding contract formation and breach. Deafeasible commitments are used to provide a useful link between multi-agent systems and legal doctrines. The proposed model makes the commitments more expressive relative to contract law and it stresses the representational rather than the operational side of the commitment life cycle. As a consequence, the broader semantics helps in modeling different types of contracts (gratuitous promises, unilateral contracts, bilateral contracts, and forward contracts) and negotiation patterns. The semantics of higher-order commitments is useful in deciding whether to sign an agreement or not and to represent a larger variety of protocols and legal contracts.

[1]  Richard Craswell CONTRACT LAW: GENERAL THEORIES , 2000 .

[2]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Contextualizing commitment protocol , 2006, AAMAS '06.

[3]  Feng Wan,et al.  Formalizing and achieving multiparty agreements via commitments , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[4]  Benjamin Cox,et al.  NetBill Security and Transaction Protocol , 1995, USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce.

[5]  Michael Winikoff,et al.  Enhancing Commitment Machines , 2004, DALT.

[6]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Temporalised normative positions in defeasible logic , 2005, ICAIL '05.

[7]  Benjamin N. Grosof Representing e-commerce rules via situated courteous logic programs in RuleML , 2004, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[8]  Victor R. Lesser,et al.  Leveled Commitment Contracts and Strategic Breach , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[9]  Munindar P. Singh An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[10]  Marco Colombetti,et al.  A commitment-based communicative act library , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[11]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Modeling exceptions via commitment protocols , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[12]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Reasoning about Commitments in the Event Calculus: An Approach for Specifying and Executing Protocols , 2004, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[13]  A. Chopra Contextualizing Commitment Protocols , .

[14]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Contract Enactment in Virtual Organizations: A Commitment-Based Approach , 2006, AAAI.

[15]  Ioan Alfred Letia,et al.  Running Contracts with Defeasible Commitment , 2006, IEA/AIE.

[16]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Representing business contracts in RuleML , 2005, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..

[17]  Brahim Chaib-draa,et al.  Modelling Flexible Social Commitments and Their Enforcement , 2004, ESAW.

[18]  Munindar P. Singh An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: , 1999, Artificial Intelligence and Law.