Management of systemic risks and cascade failures in a networked society

The qualification of risks lies in their systemic nature. A risk to one subsystem may present an opportunity to another subsystem. A systemic risk is the possibility that an event will trigger a loss of confidence in a substantial portion of the system serious enough to have adverse consequences on system performance. A systemic risk therefore impacts the integrity of the whole system. In this chapter, we use networks to address risks. A network, which is a collection of nodes with links between them, can be a useful representation of a system. For instance, network analysis can explain certain systemic risks in financial systems by modeling interactions among financial institutions. A network approach is also useful in mitigating large blackouts caused by cascade failure. In this case, instead of looking at the details of particular blackouts, we investigate the cascade dynamics as a series of blackouts using risk propagation models. We use a general framework of diffusion or contagion models to describe risk propagation in networks and investigate how network topology impacts risk propagation patterns. At the macroscopic level, systemic risk is measured as the fraction of failed nodes. We divide our discussion into two classes of diffusion. First, we discuss so-called progressive diffusion processes. Many diffusion processes are progressive in the sense that once a node switches from one state to another, it remains in that state in all subsequent time steps. The second class is non-progressive diffusion where, as time progresses, nodes can switch back and forth from one state to the other, depending on the states of their neighbors. Networks increase interdependency,creating challenges formanaging risks. This is especially apparent in areas such as financial institutions and enterprise risk management, where the actions of a single actor in an interconnected network can impact all the other actors in the network. The network is only as strong as its weakest link, and trade-offs are most often connected to a function that models system performance management. In this context, there is a class of problems, ranging

[1]  D. Sornette Critical Phenomena in Natural Sciences: Chaos, Fractals, Selforganization and Disorder: Concepts and Tools , 2000 .

[2]  Stefano Battiston,et al.  Systemic risk in a unifying framework for cascading processes on networks , 2009, 0907.5325.

[3]  D. Helbing Systemic Risks in Society and Economics , 2010 .

[4]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Financial Contagion , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Financial Contagion Journal of Political Economy , 1998 .

[6]  Leeat Yariv,et al.  Diffusion, Strategic Interaction, and Social Structure , 2011, Handbook of Social Economics.

[7]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Synchronization in scale-free dynamical networks: robustness and fragility , 2001, cond-mat/0105014.

[8]  M. A. Muñoz,et al.  Optimal network topologies: expanders, cages, Ramanujan graphs, entangled networks and all that , 2006, cond-mat/0605565.

[9]  Reza Olfati-Saber,et al.  Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[10]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[11]  Bhaskar Chakravorti,et al.  The Slow Pace of Fast Change: Bringing Innovations to Market in a Connected World , 2003 .

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  COMPLEX ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS AND THE DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS , 2005 .

[13]  Didier Sornette,et al.  Shocks, Crashes and Bubbles in Financial Markets , 2010 .

[14]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Interdependent Security , 2003 .

[15]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  The role of the airline transportation network in the prediction and predictability of global epidemics , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic spreading in real networks: an eigenvalue viewpoint , 2003, 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[17]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[18]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[19]  Dunia López-Pintado,et al.  Contagion and coordination in random networks , 2006, Int. J. Game Theory.

[20]  James Surowiecki The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations Doubleday Books. , 2004 .

[21]  J. Kurths,et al.  Network synchronization, diffusion, and the paradox of heterogeneity. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  Fang Wu,et al.  Management fads, pedagogies, and other soft technologies , 2009 .

[23]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  You Only Die Once: Managing Discrete Interdependent Risks , 2003 .

[24]  M. Newman,et al.  Network theory and SARS: predicting outbreak diversity , 2004, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[25]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic thresholds in real networks , 2008, TSEC.

[26]  熊谷 ユリヤ,et al.  James Surowiecki, 『The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations』, Random House, 5,2004, $24.95 , 2005 .

[27]  Adam Jaworski,et al.  Silence : interdisciplinary perspectives , 1997 .

[28]  K. Dessouky,et al.  Network synchronization , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[29]  Akira Namatame Adaptation and Evolution in Collective Systems , 2006, Advances in Natural Computation.