A Comparative Study of Transdermal Buprenorphine and Oral Morphine in the Treatment of Chronic Pain of Malignant Origin

Background and Objective: The study was designed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of buprenorphine transdermal (TD) against oral morphine in pain management of cancer patient. Methods: A randomized open-labeled prospective study was done in palliative cancer pain clinic in a tertiary care medical college between August 2017 and January 2018, to compare the efficacy (pain assessed by VAS) and adverse events (CTCAEv4) between arm A, buprenorphine TD, (20 μg/h, extended 7 days formulation) and arm B, oral morphine (10mg immediate releasing formulation). Patients with solid tumour malignancies with VAS score >40 (moderate to severe pain) were included in study. Results: 63 patients were analyzed. Commonest primary cancers were breast in females and head and neck in male individuals in both arms. Initial VAS score of arm A and arm B were 81.25 and 82.26 respectively. By 1st week, 11 arm A patients were relieved from pain. Another 17 patients of arm A became pain free by 2nd week, total dose of 40 μg/h. Only 4 patients needed 60 μg/h for pain relief. In arm B, 2 patients were relieved by 1 week with total 30mg/day morphine, 11patients were relieved with 60 mg/day by 2nd week and 12 patients with 90 mg/day. 6 patients were relieved with 120 mg/day dose at the end of 4th week. Nausea and constipation were stastically higher in Arm B compared to that of Arm-A. Conclusions: TD Buprenorphine had similar efficacy with oral morphine, with better toxicity profile and better compliance.

[1]  J. R. Sneyd,et al.  Opioid analgesics , 2017, Reactions Weekly.

[2]  O. Carrillo-Torres,et al.  Role of buprenorphine in acute postoperative pain , 2016 .

[3]  J. Dobrogowski,et al.  Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of cancer and non-cancer pain — the results of multicenter studies in Poland , 2011, Pharmacological reports : PR.

[4]  Nalini Vadivelu,et al.  Buprenorphine in postoperative pain management. , 2010, Anesthesiology clinics.

[5]  K. Hoerauf,et al.  Efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 289 patients with severe cancer pain. , 2008, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[6]  R. Likar,et al.  Challenging the equipotency calculation for transdermal buprenorphine: four case studies , 2007, International journal of clinical practice.

[7]  J. V. Levy,et al.  Opioid Rotation from High‐Dose Morphine to Transdermal Buprenorphine (Transtec®) in Chronic Pain Patients , 2007, Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain.

[8]  C. Aurilio,et al.  Buprenorphine in long-term control of chronic pain in cancer patients. , 2007, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[9]  R. Sittl Transdermal buprenorphine in cancer pain and palliative care , 2006, Palliative medicine.

[10]  R. Sittl,et al.  Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain , 2005, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[11]  R. Sittl,et al.  Equipotent doses of transdermal fentanyl and transdermal buprenorphine in patients with cancer and noncancer pain: results of a retrospective cohort study. , 2005, Clinical therapeutics.

[12]  R. Sittl,et al.  Transdermal buprenorphine in the treatment of chronic pain: results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. , 2004, Clinical therapeutics.

[13]  R. Likar,et al.  Efficacy and tolerability of a new opioid analgesic formulation, buprenorphine transdermal therapeutic system (TDS), in the treatment of patients with chronic pain. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study , 2003 .

[14]  K. Budd Buprenorphine and the transdermal system: the ideal match in pain management. , 2003, International journal of clinical practice. Supplement.

[15]  J. Downing,et al.  Buprenorphine: a new potent long-acting synthetic analgesic. Comparison with morphine. , 1977, British journal of anaesthesia.