Data Injection Attacks in Randomized Gossiping

The subject of this paper is the detection and mitigation of data injection attacks in randomized average consensus gossip algorithms. It is broadly known that the main advantages of randomized average consensus gossip are its fault tolerance and distributed nature. Unfortunately, the flat architecture of the algorithm also increases the attack surface for a data injection attack. Even though we cast our problem in the context of sensor network security, the attack scenario is identical to existing models for opinion dynamics (the so-called DeGroot model) with stubborn agents steering the opinions of the group toward a final state that is not the average of the network initial states. We specifically propose two novel strategies for detecting and locating attackers and study their detection and localization performance numerically and analytically. Our detection and localization methods are completely decentralized and, therefore, nodes can directly act on their conclusions and stop receiving information from nodes identified as attackers. As we show by simulation, the network can often recover in this fashion, leveraging the resilience of randomized gossiping to reduced network connectivity.

[1]  M. Rudelson,et al.  Hanson-Wright inequality and sub-gaussian concentration , 2013 .

[2]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Active Sensing of Social Networks , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[3]  P. Massart,et al.  Concentration inequalities and model selection , 2007 .

[4]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Randomized gossip algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  Effect of zealotry in high-dimensional opinion dynamics models. , 2015, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Pascal Bianchi,et al.  Robust average consensus using Total Variation Gossip Algorithm , 2012, 6th International ICST Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools.

[7]  Sushil Jajodia,et al.  LEAP+: Efficient security mechanisms for large-scale distributed sensor networks , 2006, TOSN.

[8]  Soummya Kar,et al.  Gossip Algorithms for Distributed Signal Processing , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Ming Li,et al.  Vulnerability and protection for distributed consensus-based spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[10]  Sham M. Kakade,et al.  A tail inequality for quadratic forms of subgaussian random vectors , 2011, ArXiv.

[11]  Anand D. Sarwate,et al.  Broadcast Gossip Algorithms for Consensus , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  P. Massart,et al.  Adaptive estimation of a quadratic functional by model selection , 2000 .

[13]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Consensus based Detection in the Presence of Data Falsification Attacks , 2015, ArXiv.

[14]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[15]  A. Ozdaglar,et al.  Discrete Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents , 2011 .

[16]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks , 2010, Math. Oper. Res..

[17]  Sasikanth Avancha,et al.  Security for Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[18]  M. Mobilia Does a single zealot affect an infinite group of voters? , 2003, Physical review letters.

[19]  Shlomo Havlin,et al.  How does public opinion become extreme? , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Detection of data injection attacks in decentralized learning , 2015, 2015 49th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[21]  Mehmet E. Yildiz,et al.  Computing Along Routes via Gossiping , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.