Do Your Neighbors Affect Your Mode Choice? A Spatial Probit Model for Commuting to the Ohio State University

Neighborhood effects have recently become a focus of interest in transportation research, whereby transportation mode choice is not only affected by an individual’s characteristics and the physical conditions of the transportation system, but also by the mode choices of that individual’s neighbors. This study supports the neighborhood effects argument, using a spatial econometrics approach and data from The Ohio State University’s 2011 Campus Transportation Survey. A spatial probit model of commuters’ mode choices (auto versus non-auto) is estimated, accounting for spatial autocorrelation. The results reveal that the more non-auto (walking, bicycling, and transit) users are residing around an individual, the more attractive these modes become for this individual. In addition to these spatial effects, the results indicate that students are more likely to commute to campus by non-auto modes, as compared to faculty and staff, and that the probability of choosing non-auto modes decreases with distance from campus. Feeling of safety, duration of travel, flexibility of departure time, ability to make stops on the way to/from campus, and attitudes towards auto use (being a car patron or a captive user), also affect an individual’s mode choice. These findings provide campus transportation planners new insights on the factors influencing travel mode choices.

[1]  A. Páez,et al.  Social Influence on Travel Behavior: A Simulation Example of the Decision to Telecommute , 2007 .

[2]  J. Garvill,et al.  Expected car use reduction in response to structural travel demand management measures , 2010 .

[3]  Patricia L. Mokhtarian,et al.  What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods? , 2005 .

[4]  Eduardo Barata,et al.  Parking at the UC campus: Problems and solutions , 2011 .

[5]  Teresa M Adams,et al.  Carsharing in a University Community , 2009 .

[6]  Carlos J. L. Balsas,et al.  Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses , 2003 .

[7]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised Edition. , 1994 .

[8]  W. Brock,et al.  A Multinomial-Choice Model of Neighborhood Effects , 2002 .

[9]  J. LeSage Introduction to spatial econometrics , 2009 .

[10]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Bicycling Choice and Gender Case Study: The Ohio State University , 2013 .

[11]  Marlon G. Boarnet,et al.  The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies , 2001 .

[12]  Bryan Dorsey,et al.  Mass transit trends and the role of unlimited access in transportation demand management , 2005 .

[13]  Frank Goetzke,et al.  Walkability as a Summary Measure in a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model: An Instrumental Variable Approach , 2010 .

[14]  R. Cervero,et al.  Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods - eScholarship , 1995 .

[15]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  How do individuals adapt their personal travel? Objective and subjective influences on the consideration of travel-related strategies for San Francisco Bay Area commuters , 2005 .

[16]  J. LeSage,et al.  Spatial Growth Regressions: Model Specification, Estimation and Interpretation , 2007 .

[17]  A. Páez,et al.  A Discrete-Choice Approach to Modeling Social Influence on Individual Decision Making , 2008 .

[18]  Frank Goetzke,et al.  Network Effects in Public Transit Use: Evidence from a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model for New York , 2008 .

[19]  Gulsah Akar,et al.  Influence of Individual Perceptions and Bicycle Infrastructure on Decision to Bike , 2009 .

[20]  Frank Goetzke,et al.  Bicycle Use in Germany: Explaining Differences between Municipalities with Social Network Effects , 2011, Urban studies.

[21]  Jinhua Zhao,et al.  Subjective Measure of Car Dependence , 2011 .

[22]  Charles Abraham,et al.  Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence , 2011 .

[23]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Smart Growth and the Transportation-Land Use Connection: What Does the Research Tell Us? , 2005 .

[24]  William A. Brock,et al.  Discrete Choice with Social Interactions , 2001 .

[25]  Arthur Christian Nelson,et al.  If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them: Association Between Bicycle Facilities and Bicycle Commuting , 1997 .

[26]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework , 2002 .