Aging modulates the effects of scene complexity on visual search and target selection in virtual environments

Processing task-relevant visual information is important for successfully completing many everyday tasks. Prior work demonstrated that older adults are more susceptible to distraction by salient stimuli, leading to less efficient visual search. However, these studies often relied on simple stimuli, and little is known about how aging influences visual attention in environments more representative of real-world complexity. Here, we test the hypothesis that aging impacts how the visual complexity of the environment influences visual search. We asked young and older adults to complete a virtual reality-based visual search task with three levels of increasing visual complexity. As visual complexity increased, all participants took longer to complete the task. This increase in time to completion resulted from two factors: an increased time required to transfer gaze from one target to the next as participants re-fixated task-relevant objects and longer lags between when correct targets were fixated and selected. We also found that these changes in gaze trajectory were greater in older adults. In addition, we found that short-term and working memory capacities were positively associated with multiple performance measures in the visual search task. This suggests that visual search performance could be integrated into assessments of working memory in dynamic environments.

[1]  Pushpak Bhattacharyya,et al.  Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Visuospatial Function and Oculomotor Control , 2021, 2021 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW).

[2]  R. Klein,et al.  Role of aging and working memory in performance on a naturalistic visual search task , 2020, Cortex.

[3]  P. Madeleine,et al.  The effects of age on response time, accuracy, and shoulder/arm kinematics during hammering. , 2020, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  G. Doniger,et al.  Multimodal immersive trail making-virtual reality paradigm to study cognitive-motor interactions , 2020, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[5]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  Effects of Visual Scene Complexity on Neural Signatures of Spatial Attention , 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.

[6]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  Nicholas Gaspelin,et al.  Inhibition as a potential resolution to the attentional capture debate. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[8]  Steven J. Luck,et al.  The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  E. Wascher,et al.  Compliance instead of flexibility? On age-related differences in cognitive control during visual search , 2017, Neurobiology of Aging.

[10]  L. Calvó-Perxas,et al.  The Trail Making Test , 2017, Assessment.

[11]  K. Heilman,et al.  The aging brain: Movement speed and spatial control , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  Kari S. Kretch,et al.  Active vision in passive locomotion: real-world free viewing in infants and adults. , 2015, Developmental science.

[13]  Jiajia Yang,et al.  Effects of aging on pointing movements under restricted visual feedback conditions. , 2015, Human movement science.

[14]  A. Diamond Executive functions. , 2014, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[15]  Taylor W. Schmitz,et al.  Distinguishing attentional gain and tuning in young and older adults , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[16]  Richard P. Heitz,et al.  The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[17]  C. Harada,et al.  Normal cognitive aging. , 2013, Clinics in geriatric medicine.

[18]  Gary K Grunwald,et al.  GLIMMPSE: Online Power Computation for Linear Models with and without a Baseline Covariate. , 2013, Journal of statistical software.

[19]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Age-related differences in selection by visual saliency , 2013, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[20]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Methods for comparing scanpaths and saliency maps: strengths and weaknesses , 2012, Behavior Research Methods.

[21]  Katharina N. Seidl,et al.  Neural Evidence for Distracter Suppression during Visual Search in Real-World Scenes , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Zach Shipstead,et al.  Working Memory Capacity and Visual Attention: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Guidance , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  T. Salthouse,et al.  What cognitive abilities are involved in trail-making performance? , 2011, Intelligence.

[24]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[25]  Mary M Hayhoe,et al.  Vision in the natural world. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[26]  Taylor W. Schmitz,et al.  Failing to Ignore: Paradoxical Neural Effects of Perceptual Load on Early Attentional Selection in Normal Aging , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  G. Stoet PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[28]  M. Mather Aging and cognition. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[29]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  F. Barceló,et al.  Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities , 2009, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[31]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related top-down suppression deficit in the early stages of cortical visual memory processing , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Yuanzhen Li,et al.  Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[33]  David J. Madden,et al.  Aging and Visual Attention , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[34]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Top‐Down Modulation and Normal Aging , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  M. Land Eye movements and the control of actions in everyday life , 2006, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[36]  J. Cummings,et al.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A Brief Screening Tool For Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[37]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye movements in natural behavior , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  B. Hommel,et al.  Visual search across the life span. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[39]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[42]  David E. Irwin,et al.  Age Differences in the Control of Looking Behavior: Do You Know Where Your Eyes Have Been? , 2000, Psychological science.

[43]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[44]  Yiannis Aloimonos,et al.  Vision and action , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[45]  Elizabeth B. Isaacs,et al.  Differential course of development of spatial and verbal memory span: A normative study , 1989 .

[46]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[48]  E. Matin Saccadic suppression: a review and an analysis. , 1974, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  R. Reitan Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage , 1958 .

[50]  Cenap Çakmak Review and Analysis , 2017 .

[51]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Visual search and the aging brain: discerning the effects of age-related brain volume shrinkage on alertness, feature binding, and attentional control. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[52]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view" , 2007 .

[53]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[54]  C. Folk,et al.  The effects of age on guided conjunction search. , 1996, Experimental aging research.

[55]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[56]  B. Milner MEMORY AND THE MEDIAL TEMPORAL REGIONS OF THE BRAIN , 1970 .